Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study of faculty evaluation of teaching practice between Chinese and U.S. Institutions of higher education

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

Along with the “massification” of higher education in China since the late 1990s, the issue of quality and excellence appeared at the top of China’s higher education agenda. Since faculty evaluation of teaching is one of the major approaches adopted by China’s higher education sector to pursue quality and excellence, it is valuable to examine the effectiveness of faculty evaluation of teaching practices adopted by the Chinese higher education institutions (HEIs). Study of current literature reveals some similarities and differences between the faculty evaluation of teaching policies and practices between Chinese and American higher education sectors. This paper examines the specific practices adopted by some top-tier Chinese HEIs and American elite colleges and universities, summarizes and analyzes the major differences and similarities of faculty evaluation of teaching practices between these two countries’ top-tier HEIs, and discusses the applicability of the American models to the Chinese setting of higher education. Finally, a set of best practices regarding faculty evaluation of teaching are proposed for Chinese HEIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arreola, R. A. (1995). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreola, R. A. (2000). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, L. W. (1990). Self-assessment. In Millman, J. & Darling-Hammond L. (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Institute of Technology. (2003). 北京理工大学本科教学质量监控评价办法 [Procedures for Evaluation and Supervision of Undergraduate Teaching at Beijing Institute of Technology]. Retrieved August 25, 2010 from http://www.bit.edu.cn/jyjx/bksjy/jxglwj/ 418.htm

  • Beijing Normal University Office of Teaching Affairs. (2009). 关于展开2009–2010学年第一学期本科课堂教学质量网上评价工作的通知 [Notice about Implementing Online Evaluation of Undergraduate Teaching for Fall 2010]. Retrieved August 25, 2010 from http://jwc.bnu.edu.cn/jxzl/jxpg/28087.htm

  • Broder, J. M., & Dorfman, J. H. (1994). Determinants of teaching quality: What’s important to students? Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L. A., Brandenburgh, D. C., Kohen, E., Ory, J. C., & Mayberry, P. W. (1984). Evaluating teaching effectiveness: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Handbook of Academic Administration. (2009). Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://www.brown.edu/Administration/Provost/handbook/

  • Buckridge, M. (2008). Teaching portfolios: their role in teaching and learning policy. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W. E. (1983). Concerns about using student ratings in community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 11(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1987). Formative and summative evaluation: Parody or paradox? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (31), 47–55.

  • Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1994). The use of the teaching portfolio and student evaluations for summative evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(5), 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. N., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51(3), 281–309. Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://rer.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/51/3/281.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University Teaching Evaluation Handbook. (8th ed.). (2008). Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://www.cte.cornell.edu/resources/teh/teh.html

  • De Rijdt, C., Tiquet, E., Dochy, F., & Devolder, M. (2006). Teaching portfolios in higher education and their effects: An explorative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1084–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke University Faculty Handbook. (2009). Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://www.provost.duke.edu/pdfs/fhb/FHB.pdf

  • East China Normal University Office of Teaching Affairs. (2006). 教学督导工作맜理办法 [Policies for Teaching Evaluation Experts]. Retrieved on August 25, 2010 from http://www.jwc.ecnu.edu.cn/site08/news/manage/news/news_show.asp?id=140

  • Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship in teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faculty Rules & Regulations. (2010). Version 8.0. Brown University. Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://facgov.brown.edu/rules/FacultyRules.pdf

  • Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external observers. Research in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S. P. (2009). Teaching evaluation of higher education institutions: Retrospect and prospect. Chinese Education and Society, 42(2), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C., & Tian, Y. (2008). 完善高校教师评价体系的思考 [Thoughts about improving the mechanism of teaching evaluation in higher education institutions]. 当代教育论坛: 教师教育研究 [Forum on Contemporary Education: Teacher Educational Research]. Handbook for Faculty and Academic Administrators: A Selection of Policies and Procedures of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://www.upenn.edu/assoc-provost/handbook

  • Harbin Institute of Technology Office of Teaching Affairs. 哈尔滨工业大学教务处教学质量规章制度. [Regulations of Evaluation of Undergraduate Teaching at Harbin Institute of Technology]. Retrieved on August 25, 2010 from http://jwc.hit.edu.cn/Jwc/ShowGZZD. asp?ID=6

  • Information for Faculty Offering Instruction in Arts and Sciences 2009–2010. (2009). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Office of Registrar, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://webdocs.registrar.fas.harvard.edu/faculty_handbook/current/faculty_handbook.pdf

  • Instructor’s Online Tutorial. The Center for Teaching & Learning. University of Chicago. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from http://teaching.uchicago.edu/tutorial/index.html#assess.

  • Jiang, K. (2010). Chinese education of undergraduate teaching: Guest editor’s introduction. Chinese Education and Society, 42(2), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keig, L. W., & Waggoner, M. D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 2). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267–286. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&hid=8&sid=5bb17271-9362-4746-a5a0-08c106834b77%40sessionmgr12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, K. P. (1999). How fair are student ratings in assessing the teaching performance of university teachers? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(2), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzhou University Office of Teaching Affairs. (1999). 兰州大学关于展开本科课程教学评估的决定. [Decision about Implementing Evaluation of Undergraduate Teaching at Lanzhou University]. Retrieved August 25, 2010 from http://jwc.lzu.edu.cn/2005/jwcfile.asp?FHid=261

  • Lin, Y. (2008). 关于高校教师教学质量评价的研究 [Research on teaching evaluation in higher education institutions]. 吉林广播电视大学学报 [Journal of Jilin Radio and TV University], 4, Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://www.cqvip.com/qk/82914X/200804/27742286.html

  • Liu, J. (2007). 我国高校教师教学质量评价研究综述 [A summary of research on teaching evaluation in Chinese colleges and universities]. 黑龙江教育: 高教研究与评估版 [Heilongjiang Education: Higher Educational Research and Evaluation], (4), 85–86.

  • March, H. W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 707–754. Retrieved August 20, 2010, from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1985-10875-001&CFID=29111707&CFTOKEN=12179532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 217–251. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from http://www.jstor.org/pss/1163195

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2001). 关于加强高等学校本科教学工作提高教学质量的若干意见 [Notice of improving teaching quality in order to strengthen undergraduate teaching]. Retrieved August 31, 2010, from http://www.pgzx.edu.cn/upload/files/zxwd/jg20014.pdf

  • Minzu University of China Office of Teaching Affairs. (2007). 中央民族大学本科教师课堂及教学质量评价办法. [Procedures for Evaluation of Undergraduate Teaching at the Central University of Minzu University of China]. Retrieved August 25, 2010 from http://jw.muc.edu.cn/jwc/readnews.asp?id=260

  • MIT Online Subject Evaluation. (n.d.). Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://web.mit.edu/subjectevaluation/

  • Nie, D. M., & Xu, J. S. (2006). 高校教师教学质量评价中的矛盾及其消解 [The contradictions & countermeasures of the teaching quality evaluation of college teachers]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报 [Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University], 5(3), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. L. (1998). Integrating student and peer evaluation of teaching. College Teaching, 46(1), 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Farrar, H. B. (2006). The teaching portfolio: A handbook for faculty teaching assistants and teaching fellows (3rd ed.). Brown University: The Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved August 27, 2010, from http://www.brown.edu/Administration/Sheridan_Center/docs/teach_port.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1997). Improving college teaching: Learning to use what we know. Paper presented for the international conference on improving college teaching. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  • Seldin, P. (1998). The Teaching Portfolio. Paper presented for the American Council on Education, Department Chairs Seminar, San Diego, CA.

  • Seldin, P. (1999). Current practice—good and bad—nationally. Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, M. F. (1994). Peer review of teaching. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from ERIC database. (ED371689)

  • Sichuan University Office of Teaching Affairs. (2003). 四川大学本科教学质量监控试行办法 [Trial Procedure of Supervision of Undergraduate Teaching at Sichuan University]. Retrieved August 25, 2010 from http://pharmacy.scu.edu.cn/03rencaipeiyang/index_benke/zhiliantixi/01.doc Subject Evaluation Policy and Procedures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Office of Faculty Support. Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://web.mit.edu/acadinfo/sse/www/#Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., Sheng, Y. L., Yang, C. Q., & Xu, S. L. (2006). 国内高校教师评价体系的变迁历程与阶段特征 [Stages of development and characteristics of faculty evaluation system in Chinese higher education institutions]. 清华大学教育研究 [Tsinghua Journal of Education], 27(2), 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Chicago Committee on the Criteria of Academic Appointment. (1972). A Report of the University of Chicago Committee on the Criteria of Academic Appointment. The University of Chicago Record, 5(6). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. Retrieved August 20, 2010, from http://provost.uchicago.edu/pdfs/shilsrpt.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • World University Rankings 2010–2011. Times Higher Education. Retrieved October 28, 2010, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/

  • Xu, C. N. (2006). 教学质量评价指标体系的研究 [Research on the mechanism of teaching evaluation criteria]. Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://jwc.scu.edu.cn/details.jsp?aid=200

  • Yale University Faculty Handbook. (2002). Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://www.yale.edu/provost/handbook/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Admissions and Financial Aid, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    Qianyi Chen

  2. School of Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    John L. Yeager

Authors
  1. Qianyi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John L. Yeager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qianyi Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Yeager, J.L. Comparative study of faculty evaluation of teaching practice between Chinese and U.S. Institutions of higher education. Front. Educ. China 6, 200–226 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0129-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0129-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation