Skip to main content
Log in

Co-existence of service and productiveness of education from consumers’ perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

Neither of the “Three Industry” Theory nor the “General Agreement of Trading Service” (GATS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be the essential criteria to analyze the property of education. The property of education can be defined from consumers’ perspective. The direct consumers of education are students; but the ultimate consumers of education include parents, employers, society and governments as well. From the perspective of consumers, education is both a service and a productive institution.

摘要

三次产业划分理论和世界贸易组织的 «服务贸易协定» 都不能作为判断教育属性的根本依据。 教育是以消费为目的的, 理解教育的属性也应从消费者的角度出发。 教育的直接消费者是学生, 但最终消费者还包括家长、 用人单位、 社会和政府等。 从消费者的角度来看, 教育具有服务性与生产性。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng F C, Hong C W (2000). Ideas of the total quality management in the West educational management in the 1990s. Comparative Education Review, 21(7): 164–168 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnie R M, Briggs L J, Wager W (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (in Chinese, trans. Pi L S, Pang W G). Shanghai: East China Normal University, 1999, 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X B (2004). A study of educational service and its value. Educational Research, 24(1): 44–47 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger K, Douglas Z (1993). Quality Management Plus: The Continuous Improvement of Education. California: Corwin Press Inc, 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis E (1993). Total Quality Management in Education. London: Kogan Page Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • White J (1982). The Aims of Education Restated (in Chinese, trans. Li Y H). Beijing: Education Science Publishing House, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T M (2002). The Theory of Educational Industry. Guangdong: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 390–391 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Fengchun.

Additional information

Translated from Beijing Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版) (Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences)), 2006, (2): 5–10

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, F. Co-existence of service and productiveness of education from consumers’ perspective. Front. Educ. China 2, 394–403 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0032-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0032-9

Keywords

关键词

Navigation