Skip to main content
Log in

Globalization, interdependence and education

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

Contemporary globalization is marked by rapidly and dramatically increasing interdependence, which operates both within and among countries. Increasing global interdependence has profound influence on education at all levels, such as how to deal with a world with more permeable boundaries in which people are on the move more frequently (migration) than ever before in human history, and in which urbanization is increasing at an unprecedented rate. This paper proposes a transformational analysis of contemporary globalization and identifies the increasing challenge for education due to the globalization, including the struggle to match the pace of technology change in society, to provide graduates with skills relevant to contemporary society, and to lead education students to an accommodation with persistent and rapid social change.

摘要

当代全球化的一个重要标志是深刻而日益加剧的相互依赖, 它不仅发生在国家内部, 也发生在国家之间。 日益加剧的全球化相互依赖在很多层面对教育都有着重要的影响, 包括如何应对一个界限消融而相互可渗透的世界。 本文对当代 全球化进行了分析, 并探讨了全球化给教育带来的诸多挑战, 包括教育如何赶上 技术革新的步伐, 如何培养毕业生才能使其掌握与当今社会相适应的技术, 如何培养学生才能使其适应持久而快速的社会变迁。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C (2006). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnet R J, Cavanaugh J (1994). Global Dreams: Imperial Corporations and the New World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Barshefsky C (2006). China’s reemergence and role in world trade. Beijing Forum Newsletter, 2(2): 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Battelle J (2005). The Search: How Google and its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. New York: Portfolio

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore J (2000). Globalization: A useful concept for feminists rethinking theory and strategies in education? In: Burbles N C, Torres C A, eds. Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Castronova E (2005). Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S (2005). The “Revolution of rising expectations”, relative deprivation, and the urban social disorders of the 1960s: Evidence from state-level data. Social Science History, 29(2):299–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (2006). Planet of Slums. New York: Verso

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken P (2002). Trading worlds. In: Johnston R J, Taylor P J, Watts M J, eds. Geographies of Global Change: Remapping the World. 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman T L (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider W (1997). One World Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R (2007). Our biopolitical future: Four scenarios. World Watch, March/April, 10–17

  • Held D, ed. (1991). Political Theory Today. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry J (1965). Culture against Man. New York: Vintage Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaku M (1998). Visions: How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st Century. New York: Anchor Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson M, Michie J (1995). Trade and growth: A historical perspective. In: Michie J, Grieve Smith J, eds. Managing the Global Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J (2002). Trade talk: An analysis of the impact of trade liberalization and the general agreement on trade in services on higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 6(3): 209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney R W (2001). Global media, neoliberalism and imperialism. Monthly Review, April

  • Meister J C (1998). Corporate Universities: Lessons in Building a World-class Workforce. Revised edition. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Naya S (2005). The Economics of the Enterprise for ASEAN Initiative. Singapore: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich R (1991). The Work of Nations: Preparing for the 21st Century. New York: Vintage Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger M (2002). Globalism: The New Market Ideology. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow M (1994). Managerialism and the Academic Profession: Quality and Control. London: Open University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deane Neubauer.

Additional information

Translated from Beijing Daxue Jiaoyu Pinglun 北京大学教育评论 (Peking University Education Review), 2006, 4(4): 75–83

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neubauer, D. Globalization, interdependence and education. Front. Educ. China 2, 309–324 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0026-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0026-7

Keywords

关键词

Navigation