Skip to main content
Log in

How should “self-regard” be treated in moral education

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

One of the main reasons of the fact that Chinese moral education could hardly get out of its predicament is that “self-regard” has been simply and unilaterally interpreted as the absolute opposite to morality, where “self-regard” is merely regarded as the source of “everything evil”, and the fact that it is also the source of “everything good” is neglected. Actually, “self-regard” is the nature of human beings who go for benefit and avoid harm, which is inevitable and reasonable. It is not naturally opposite to altruism, for there is no problem concerning morality in self-regard itself, though there might be some in the means adopted. Therefore, the aim of moral education is not to deprive a person of his/her intention of self-regard, but to normalize the means he/she might adopt, so that he/she could suitably benefit himself/herself as he/she benefits others. It is proven by the past experience and the present situation that the key premise for the Chinese moral education to get out of its predicament is to set up a correct understanding over self-regard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen W K (1995). On self-regard and altruism in market economy. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science), (4): 4 (in Chinese)

  • Freire, P (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2001 (in Chinese, trans. Gu J X, Zhao Y H, He S R)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y Q (2005). To make use of selfishness. Contemporary Families, (1): 16 (in Chinese)

  • Mao Y S (1997). The Moral Perspectives of the Chinese. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press, 3–4 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R (1960). Moral Man and Immoral Society. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House, 1998, 203–204 (in Chinese, trans. Huang Z R, Jiang Q)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu B H (1860). The Two Basic Questions on Ethnics. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1996, 221 (in Chinese, trans. Ren L, Meng Q S)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1). Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1972, 14 (in Chinese, trans. Guo D L, Wang Y N)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Central Compilation & Translation Bureau of the Communist Party of China (1972). A Full Collection of the Works of K. Marx and F. Engles (23). Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 12 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Central Compilation & Translation Bureau of the Communist Party of China (1974). A Full Collection of the Works of K. Marx and F. Engles (3). Beijing: People’s Publishing House (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao F (2001). On the Contemporary Harmony Between Scientism and Humanism. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 194–205 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F C (1987). Comments on Some Well-known Western Moralist. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 416 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Zhongping.

Additional information

Translated from Xueshu Yanjiu 学术研究 (Academic Research), 2005, (6): 117–120

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, Z. How should “self-regard” be treated in moral education. Front. Educ. China 2, 201–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0017-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0017-8

Keywords

Navigation