Abstract
Traditionally there has been a theoretical view that raising tuition fees will undermine education equity and social welfare. This study examines the effects of different tuition policies on both these factors. A statistical analysis is made on the theoretical relationship between higher education tuition fees and dropout probability, which leads to the conclusion that the effects of both policies on education equity vary with circumstances. Further, under severe polarization between the rich and the poor in China, low tuition fee policy fails to effectively improve access to higher education and social welfare for low-income groups. On the contrary, high tuition fee policy may have better effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen X Y, Min W F (1998). A research in private benefit of China’s higher education. Journal of Higher Education, (5):33–37 (in Chinese)
Hoenack S A, Weiler W C (1975). Cost-related tuition policies and university enrollments. The Journal of Human Resources, 10(3): 332–360.
Johnson E L (1960). Is the low-tuition principle outmoded? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 42(3): 44–47
Rose D C, Sorensen R L (1992). High tuition, financial aid, and cross-subsidization: do needy students really benefit? Southern Economic Journal, 59(1): 66–76
Wu C N, Li C X (2004). Presently tuition level of higher education shouldn’t be heightened any more. Education and Economics, (2): 63 (in Chinese)
Wu S J (2004). A comparative analysis about students’ expenditure and employment between public universities and private ones. Education and Economics, (2): 6–10 (in Chinese)
Xu G X (2003). The research about higher education tuition in China during past 15 years. Education and Economics, (1): 23–29 (in Chinese)
Zha X Y, Ding S H (2006). An empirical analysis of the externality of China’s higher education. Economic Theory and Business Management, (1): 41–45 (in Chinese)
Zhang J (2004). The construction of multi-system of universities running and promotion of education equality. Education and Economics, (2): 37–39 (in Chinese)
Zhu Z M (2003). An analysis of the pricing strategy of higher education. Education and Economics, (3): 11–15 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Qinghua Daxue Jiaoyu Yanjiu 清华大学教育研究 (Tsinghua Journal of Education), 2006, 27(1): 65–70
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zha, X., Ding, S. Can low tuition fee policy improve higher education equity and social welfare?. Front. Educ. China 2, 181–190 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0015-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-007-0015-x