Skip to main content
Log in

A financial perspective: categories of higher education institutions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

From a financial perspective, the criteria for category distinction of higher education institutions should be based on the ownership of institution property and income for recurrent expenditure. The development of modern higher education witnessed the period wherein higher education institutions have both private property and private payment for recurrent expenditure. The development also saw the period wherein all the institution properties were owned by the state and all the recurrent expenditure were paid by the government. Accordingly, universities could be divided into two categories of “public” and “private” institutions until the 1970s. However, things have been changing greatly over the past 20 years. Property ownership and payment for recurrent expenditure have been separated. The public institutions appeal to more and more individuals sharing recurrent expenditure, while private institutions ask for more and more public financial support. Therefore, some financially mixed institutions came into being and “three categories with sub-groups” has become a new phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • China Education and Manpower Resource Problem Report Group (CEMRPRG) (中国教育与人力资源问题报告课题组) (2003). From a Country with Large Population to a Strong Country Full of Human Resources (从人口大国迈向人力资源强国). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Sauvé (2002). “Trade, education and GATS: what’s in, what’s out, what’s all the fuss about?”, Higher Education Management and Policy 14(3), 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, W. (Journalist trans.) (2003). “The money-spinners of universities” (大学摇钱树), Business Weekly (Chinese Edition) (商业周刊·中文版) (12), 54–58.

  • World Bank (1994). Lessons for Higher Education. Washington DC: World Bank, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, De-guang (杨德广) (2001). Idea Exploration of Contemporary Higher Education (现代高等教育思想探索). Beijing: People’s Education Press, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Min-xuan (张民选) (1998). Ideal and Choice: Higher Education Funding-International Comparisons (理想与抉择: 大学生资助政策的国际比较). Beijing: People’s Education Press, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Min-xuan (2001). The Change of Equity Concepts and Change of Student Financial Support Policies in China 1949–1999. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University, 56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Min-xuan.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Peking University Education Review, 2004 (2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Mx. A financial perspective: categories of higher education institutions. Front. Educ. China 1, 475–486 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-006-0024-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-006-0024-1

Keywords

Navigation