Abstract
The risk of individual citizen’s investment in education specifically refers to the benefit changeability of individual investment in education. Risks always go with uncertainty. By adopting the method of quantile regression estimation and taking the Chinese urban citizens as samples, the author makes a positivist study of the risk of Chinese urban citizens’ individual investment in education. The result indicates that the individual citizen’s investment in education often suffers obvious benefit changeability, i.e., the risk and benefit of investment in education shows a positive correlation. It is not realistic to reduce the inequality of salaries by means of investing more money for receiving higher-level education. Therefore, relevant policy makers should pay due attention to the establishment of the mechanism for sharing the risk of investment in education and the system of social insurance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sharp W., Investment (5th edn), Chinese Version. Beijing: Renmin Daxue Chubanshe, (1998), 2
Eichner A. S., Why Economics is Not Yet a Science, Peking: Daxue Chubanshe, (1990), 150
Smith A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chinese Version, Shanxi Renmin Chubanshe, (2001), 139
Becker G., Human Captital—A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Chinese Version, Peking: Daxue Chubanshe, (1985), 64
Hartog J., Pereira P. T. and Vieira J. C., Changing returns to education in Portugal during the 1980s and early 1990s: OLS and quantile regression estimators, Appl. Econ., 2000
Harmon C., Hogan V. and Walker I., Dispersion in Economic Return to Schooling, CEPR Discussion paper, 2001
Pereira P. T. and Martins P. S., Is there a return-risk link in education, http://repeec.iza.org/repec/discussionpaper/dp321.pdf, 2002
Koenker R. and Bassett G., Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 2000, 46
Card D., The causal effect of education on earnings, in: Ashenfelter O. and Card D., eds., Handbook of Labour Economics, vol. 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, (1999)
Buchinsky M., Changes in the US wage structure, 1963–1987: application of quantile regression, Econometrica, 1994, 62: 405–458
Pereira P. T., 2004: Does education reduce wage inequality? Quantile regression evidence from 16 countries, Labour Econ., 2004, 11
Chen S., Is investment in college education risky? Ph.D. dissertation. State University of New York, 2001
Chen Xiaoyu 陈晓宇, Chen L. 陈良焜 and Xiachen 夏晨, “20 shiji 90 niandai zhongguo chenzhen jiaoyu shouyi lue de bianhua yu qishi,”20 世纪90年代中国城镇教育收益率的变化与启示 (Rates of Return to Schooling in Urban China: Changes in the 1990s, 2000), Beijing daxue jiaoyu pinglun (Peking University Education Review), 2003, 1(2)
Evangelos M. F., A quantile regression analysis of wages in Panama, http://www.econ.yale.edu/seminars/NEUDC03/FALARIS.pdf, 2003
Gui Yongping 桂詠评 and Nie Yongyou 聂永有, Touzi fengxian, 投资风险 (Investment risk), Lixin Kuaiji Chubanshe (Lixin Accounting Press), 1996
Hirshleifer J. and Riley J. G., The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information, Chinese version, Chinese Social Science Press, 2000
Levhari D. and Weiss Y., The effect of risk on the investment in human capital, Am. Econ. Rev., 1974, 74(8)
Nicholson W., Microeconomic Theory Basic Principles and Extensions, Chinese version, Beijing: Zhongguo Jingji Chubanshe, 1999
Pritchett S. T., Risk Management and Insurance, Chinese version, Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe, 1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Education Research, 2005:4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, X., Ding, X. Educational Investment Risk of the Urban Citizens: Empirical Evidence in China. Front. Educ. China 1, 100–111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-005-0012-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-005-0012-x