Skip to main content
Log in

Theory and Practice on Teacher Performance Evaluation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

Teacher performance evaluation plays a key role in educational personnel reform, so it has been an important yet difficult issue in educational reform. Previous evaluations on teachers failed to make strict distinction among the three dominant types of evaluation, namely, capability, achievement, and effectiveness. Moreover, teacher performance evaluation was usually restricted to task performance, neglecting contextual performance. Most researches done in teachers’ evaluation were only about college teachers. This paper suggests that teacher performance evaluation should find its theoretical foundation in teacher performance constructs. After making literature review, critical case study, critical interview, and qualitative research, the authors propose a new construct of teacher performance and make necessary analysis for the construct of reliability and validity in empirical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marsh H. W. and Dunkin M. J., eds., Students’ evaluations of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective. In Smart, Journal of Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, New York: Agathon, 1992, 253–388

  2. Cai Yonghong 蔡永红 and Lin Chongde 林崇德, “Jixiao pinggu yanjiu de xianzhuang jiqi fansi” 绩效评估研究的现状及其反思 (The Status and Reflection of Performance Appraisal Research). Beijing shifan daxue xuebao (renwen shehui kexue ban) (Journal of Beijing Normal University, the Human and Social Science Edition), 2001, 4: 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borman W. C. and Motowidlo S. J., eds., Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N. and Borman W. C., Personnel Selection in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993, 71–98

  4. Marsh H. W., Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research, International Journal of Educational Research, 1987, 11(3): 253–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman K. A., Association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies, Research of Higher Education, 1989, 30(6): 137–194

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aubrecht J. D., Hanna G. S. and Hoyt D. O., A comparison of high school student ratings of teaching effectiveness with teacher self-ratings: factor analytic and multitrait-multimethod analyses, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986, 46(1): 223–231

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox R., Peck R. F., Blattstein S. and Blattstein D., Student evaluation of teacher as a measure of teacher behavior and teacher impact on students, Journal of Educational Research, 1983, 77(1): 15–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cai Yonghong.

Additional information

Translated from Teacher Education Research, 2005, 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, Y., Lin, C. Theory and Practice on Teacher Performance Evaluation. Front. Educ. China 1, 29–39 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-005-0004-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-005-0004-x

Keywords

Navigation