Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance Weighting in the Domain-of-Life Approach to Subjective Well-Being: the Consideration of Age

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The domain-of-life approach to subjective well-being (SWB) has been popular for decades. Recognizing the possibility that individuals may not perceive all life domains equally important, many researchers advocate for importance weighting, which is to incorporate the relative importance of life domains (i.e., domain importance) into the scoring of SWB at the individual level. However, the need for and the adequacy of importance weighting remain topics of debate. What has been missing in the debate is the consideration of influences of potential confounding factors. Given that age is significantly associated with domain satisfaction, domain importance, and SWB, assessing importance weighting should not ignore the potential confounding effect of age. Analyzing data from an online survey, we found that adjusting for the confounding effect of age produced negligible changes in the results of assessing the role that domain importance played in the relationship between domain satisfaction and SWB. Our findings support the observations from the literature that the results of assessing importance weighting depended on the SWB variable selected. However, given our non-probability study sample, future studies should continue to consider age as a confounder in assessing importance weighting in the domain-of-life approach to SWB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2010). Missing data. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 231–257). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D., & Christakis, N. (1994). Logit models for sets of ranked items. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 199–228). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchley, R. C. (1982). The aging self. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardo, A. R. (2017). A life course model for a domain-of-life approach to happiness: Evidence from the United States. Advances in Life Course Research, 33, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22, 581–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. F. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2809–2818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1985). Applied multiple regression and correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the tale of gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., McCabe, M. P., Romeo, Y., & Gullone, E. (1994). The comprehensive quality of life scale: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on tertiary staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction withLife Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. American Psychologist, 46, 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K. (1996). Missing links: The case for a social psychology of the life course. The Gerontologist, 36, 248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K. (2010). Still happy after all these years: Research frontiers on subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 658, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 455–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A. R., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The self-concept in life span and aging research. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 227–252). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2001). Correlates of financial satisfaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2003a). Age, income and financial satisfaction. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 56, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2003b). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2005). Age and relative importance of major life domains. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2011). Money and happiness: Does age make a difference? Ageing and Society, 31, 1289–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2012). Importance is not unimportant: The role of importance weighting in QoL measures. Social Indicators Research, 109, 206–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2015). The often overlooked issue of statistical power: This and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measurements. Social Science Research, 50, 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2016). Domain importance in subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 127, 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy, G. P. (2014). Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2017). Synthesis of indicators through weighting: The experiences of quality of life measures. In F. Maggino (Ed.). Complexity in Society: From Indicators Construction to their Synthesis. Social Indicators Research Series, 70, 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60595-1_10.

  • Hsieh, C. M., & Li, Q. (2019). What importance? Importance weighting and subjective well-being. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 3, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. P. (1996). Indicator and stratification methods for missing explanatory variables in multiple linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. T., Bialowolski, P., Weziak-Bialowolska, D., Mooney, K. D., Lerner, P. J., McNeely, E., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2021). Self-assessed importance of domains of flourishing: Demographics and correlations with well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1716050.

  • Maddox, G. L. (1992). Aging and well-being. In N. E. Cutler, D. W. Gregg, & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Aging, money, and life satisfaction: Aspects of financial gerontology (pp. 53–68). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, G. L., & Wiley, J. (1976). Scope, concepts, and methods in the study of aging. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (1st ed., pp. 3–34). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, W. (2015). Effects of gender and age on pride in work, and job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1091–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, J. M., & Schmukle, S. C. (2018). Individual importance weighting of domain satisfaction ratings does not increase validity. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D. J. (2018). The psychology of life balance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), e-Handbook of well-being, Noba Scholar handbook series: Subjective well-being. Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Kim, M. Y., Joshanloo, M., Lee, D. J., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). The relationship between domain satisfaction and domain importance: The moderating role of depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2007–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00168-w.

  • Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self evaluation across the life-span. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 97–128). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefenbach, T., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). Individual differences in the relationship between domain satisfaction and happiness: The moderating role of domain importance. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H. (2008a). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H. (2008b). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972-2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 204–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1040 West Harrison Street (MC 309), Chicago, IL, 60607-7134, USA

    Chang-ming Hsieh

  2. Xi’an Jiaotong University City College, Xi’an, China

    Qiguang Li

Authors
  1. Chang-ming Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiguang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-ming Hsieh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, Cm., Li, Q. Importance Weighting in the Domain-of-Life Approach to Subjective Well-Being: the Consideration of Age. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 525–540 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09904-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09904-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation