Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trauer and Mackinnon (2001; Quality of life research 10, pp. 579–585) recently proposed that weighting satisfaction scores by importance ratings in measuring quality of life is undesirable and unnecessary. However, they didn’t use empirical data to support their claim. In this study, different weighting algorithms developed by Cummins (1997; Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult: Manual [Deakin, University Australia]), Raphael et al. (1996; Journal of Adolescent Health 19, pp. 366–375), Ferrans and Powers (1985; Advances in Nursing Science 8, pp. 15–24) and Frisch (1992; Comprehensive Casebook of Cognitive Therapy [Plenum Press, New York]) for measuring quality of life (QOL) were applied. Weighted scores computed from these weighting algorithms were compared with unweighted scores in predicting a global life satisfaction measure by correlation and moderated regression analyses. One hundred and thirty undergraduate students at National Taiwan University participated in the study voluntarily. They completed a 15-item questionnaire on quality of campus life developed by the authors. They also completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), a global life satisfaction measure developed by Diener et al. (1985; Journal of Personality Assessment 49, pp. 71–75). The correlation results revealed that the weighted scores computed from different algorithms didn’t have higher correlations to the SWLS than the unweighted scores. The moderated regression results also revealed that item importance did not moderate the relationship between item satisfaction and the overall life satisfaction. All these findings revealed that weighting satisfaction with importance is unnecessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H.J. Arnold M.G. Evans (1979) ArticleTitle‘Testing multiplicative models does not require ratio scales’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24 41–59 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(79)90014-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Arrindell J. Heesink J.A. Feij (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 health young adults in the Netherlands’ Personality and Individual Differences 26 815–826 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Arrindell L. Meeuwesen F.J. Huyse (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample’ Personality and Individual Differences 12 117–123 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0191-8869(91)90094-R

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Atienza I. Balaguer M.L. Garcia-Merita (2003) ArticleTitle‘Satisfaction with Life Scale analysis of factorial invariance across sexes’ Personality and Individual Differences 35 1255–1260 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Bohrnstedt A. Goldberger (1969) ArticleTitle‘On the exact covariance of products of random variables’ Journal of the American Statistical Association 64 1439–1442 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2286081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Caston R. Briato (1983) ArticleTitle‘On the use of facet importance as a weighting component of job satisfaction’ Educational and Psychological Measurement 43 339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cohen (1978) ArticleTitle‘Partialed products are interactions: Partialed powers are curve components’ Psychological Bulletin 85 858–866 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Cohen P. Cohen (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.A.: 1997, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult: Manual (University Australia, Deakin).

  • E. Diener R.A. Emmons R.J. Larsen S. Griffin (1985) ArticleTitle‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale’ Journal of Personality Assessment 49 71–75 Occurrence Handle10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.G. Evans (1991) ArticleTitle‘The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited’ American Psychologist 46 6–15 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Ewen (1967) ArticleTitle‘Weighting components of job satisfaction’ Journal of Applied Psychology 51 68–73 Occurrence Handle10.1037/h0024243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Ferrans M. Powers (1985) ArticleTitle‘Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties’ Advances in Nursing Science 8 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Frisch (1992) Use of the Quality of Life Inventory in problem assessment and treatment planning for cognitive therapy of depression A. Freeman F.M. Dattlio (Eds) Comprehensive Casebook of Cognitive Therapy Plenum Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G.V. Glass (1968) ArticleTitle‘Correlations with products of variables: derivations and implications for methodology’ American Educational Research Journal 5 721–728 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1162013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Hsieh (2003) ArticleTitle‘Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance’ Social Indicators Research 61 227–240 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021354132664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Hsieh (2004) ArticleTitle‘To weight or not to weight: the role of domain importance in quality of life measurement’ Social Indicators Research 68 163–174 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025591.82518.ab

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Lewis M.E. Shevlin B.P. Bunting S. Joseph (1995) ArticleTitle‘Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale: replication and methodological refinement’ Perceptual and Motor Skills 80 304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • E.A. Locke (1969) ArticleTitle‘What is job satisfaction?’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4 309–336 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.A. Locke (1976) The nature and causes of job satisfaction M.D. Dunnette (Eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Rand McNally Chicago 1297–1343

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Lucas E. Diener E. Suh (1996) ArticleTitle‘Discriminant validity of well-being measures’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 616–628 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. McGrath R. Bedi (2004) ArticleTitle‘Why are we “weighting”? An assessment of a self-weighting approach to measuring oral health-related quality of life’ Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 32 19–24 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0301-5661.2003.00110.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.B. McFarlin E.A. Coster R.W. Rice T. Coopper-Alison (1995) ArticleTitle‘Facet importance and job satisfaction: Another look at the range of affect hypothesis’ Basic and Applied Social Psychology 16 489–502 Occurrence Handle10.1207/s15324834basp1604_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.B. McFarlin R.W. Rice (1992) ArticleTitle‘The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes’ Journal of Organizational Behavior 13 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • P.S. Mikes C.L. Hulin (1968) ArticleTitle‘Use of importance as weighting component of job satisfaction’ Journal of Applied Psychology 52 394–398 Occurrence Handle10.1037/h0026242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.H. Mobley E.A. Locke (1970) ArticleTitle‘The relationship of value importance to satisfaction’ Organisational Behavior and Human Performance 5 463–483 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(70)90035-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.L. Neugarten R.J. Havighurst S.S. Tobin (1961) ArticleTitle‘The measurement of life satisfaction’ Journal of Gerontology 16 134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Pavot E. Diener (1993) ArticleTitle‘Review of the satisfaction with life scale’ Psychological Assessment 5 164–172 Occurrence Handle10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Pavot E. Diener C.R. Colvin E. Sandvik (1991) ArticleTitle‘Further validation of the Satisfaction evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being’ Social Indicators Research 28 1–20 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01086714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Raphael E. Rukholm I. Brown P. Hill-Bailey E. Donato (1996) ArticleTitle‘The quality of life profile-Adolescent version: Background, description, and initial validation’ Journal of Adolescent Health 19 366–375 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00080-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Rice D.A. Gentile D.B. McFarlin (1991a) ArticleTitle‘Facet importance and job satisfaction’ Journal of Applied Psychology 76 31–39 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Rice K. Markus R.P. Moyer D.B. McFarlin (1991b) ArticleTitle‘Facet importance and job satisfaction: Two experimental tests of Locke’s range of affect hypothesis’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21 1977–1987

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sachs (2003) ArticleTitle‘Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong University students’ Psychologia 46 225–234 Occurrence Handle10.2117/psysoc.2003.225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Schmidt (1973) ArticleTitle‘Implications of a measurement problem for expectancy theory research’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 10 369–368 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(73)90016-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Shevlin V. Brunsden J.N.V. Miles (1998) ArticleTitle‘Satisfaction with Life Scale: analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability’ Personality and Individual Differences 25 911–916 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00088-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Shevlin B.P. Bunting (1994) ArticleTitle‘Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale’ Perceptual and Motor Skills 79 1316–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Shin D.M. Johnson (1978) ArticleTitle‘Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life’ Social Indicators Research 5 475–492 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00352944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Skevington K. O’connell the WHOQOL Group (2004) ArticleTitle‘Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100’ Quality of Life Research 13 23–34 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:QURE.0000015317.71791.be

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Staples C.A. Higgins (1998) ArticleTitle‘A study of the impact of factor importance weightings on job satisfaction measures’ Journal of Business and Psychology 13 211–232 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022907023046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Trauer A. Mackinnon (2001) ArticleTitle‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement’ Quality of life research 10 579–585 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013159414364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.K. Waters (1969) ArticleTitle‘The utility of importance weights in predicting overall job satisfaction and dissatisfaction’ Educational and Psychological Measurement 29 519–522

    Google Scholar 

  • L.K. Waters D. Roach (1971) ArticleTitle‘Comparison of unweighted and importance- weighted job satisfaction measures for three samples of female office workers’ Psychological Reports 28 779–782

    Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Westaway C. Maritz N.J. Golele (2003) ArticleTitle‘Empirical testing of the satisfaction with life scale: A South African pilot study’ Psychological Reports 92 551–554 Occurrence Handle10.2466/PR0.92.2.551-554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.H. and G. Yao.: 2005, ‘Analysis of factorial invariance across genders in the Chinese version of the satisfaction with life scale’, Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • G. Yao C.W. Chung C.F. Yu J.D. Wang (2002) ArticleTitle‘Development and verification of reliability and validity of the WHOHR-QOL-BREF Taiwan version’ Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 101 342–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt RD, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chia-Huei Wu & Grace Yao

Authors
  1. Chia-Huei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grace Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace Yao.

Additional information

This paper was a part of the first author’s Master Thesis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CH., Yao, G. Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life?. Soc Indic Res 78, 305–326 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-0212-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-0212-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation