Abstract
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health has not been clarified yet, with multiple studies warranting a special focus on women and young adults. A sample of 101 Italian women recruited from the general population was evaluated a few weeks before the onset of the pandemic and during the first and the second wave of the pandemic. Depression values at the Brief Symptom Inventory showed an initial increase followed by a stabilization on higher values in respect to the baseline, whereas Phobic Anxiety was stably worsened. Participants with insecure attachment styles and childhood trauma showed higher levels of distress at all timepoints. In many psychopathological domains, moderation analysis showed an unfavorable trend over time for younger participants. The present study seems to confirm a high burden on mental health for women during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting young age, insecure attachment style, and childhood trauma as negative prognostic factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The emergence of COVID-19 has been posited to threaten both the short-term survival of many individuals and the long-lasting mental wellness in the general population (Loades et al., 2020; Xiong et al., 2020). In fact, an impact by the generalized and prolonged conditions of insecurity was observed in several cross-sectional examinations for what concerns early-affected communities, e.g., Northern Italy and Mainland China (Fiorillo & Gorwood, 2020; Gloster et al., 2020; Hossain et al., 2020). Discordant reports of worsened mental conditions during COVID-19 pandemic may be due to the high degree of heterogeneity in enrolled populations, in particular for vulnerable and understudied individuals, as in the case of young adults, children, adolescents, women, and elderly (Copeland et al., 2021; Gruber et al., 2021; Nearchou et al., 2020; Rettie & Daniels, 2021; Sepúlveda-Loyola et al., 2020). In Italy, multiple sources highlighted increased rates of anxiety, depression, and feelings of distress — especially among those vulnerable and understudied populations already mentioned (Delmastro & Zamariola, 2020). Indeed, worse outcomes have been described among women, younger adults, and those living alone (Benatti et al., 2020; Fiorillo & Gorwood, 2020; Fiorillo et al., 2020; Giallonardo et al., 2020). Yet only a limited number of longitudinal studies has been reported in the literature. Even more rarely, descriptives of mental correlates before and after COVID-19 have been offered (Castellini et al., 2020, 2021; Meda et al., 2021; Pierce et al., 2021). The present study attempts to overcome some of the limitations in the existing literature, providing a three timepoint analysis of the evolution in the psychopathology in a population of Italian women.
As the perceived self-efficacy is one of the strongest predictors of general distress following a natural disaster (Benight et al., 1999), the authors hypothesized that young adults may have experienced worsened and adverse mental states during the pandemic. For young adults, the lack of possibility to acquire substantial independence during COVID-19 was hypothesized to be correlated with higher mental distress in the younger population as financial hardships undermined economic autonomy and career progressions (Gruber et al., 2021).
In the present study, an additional focus was placed on gender, as women in general and young women in particular seem to have a higher reliance on social-oriented coping strategies (Mélendez et al., 2012; Tamres et al., 2002). Interestingly, social-oriented coping strategies seem to be beneficial in the short-term, but less effective in the medium or long-term (Stanton & Franz, 1999). Thus, the working hypothesis was to observe worse outcomes at subsequent follow-ups in women, in accordance with previous literature (Rogowska et al., 2021).
The present study also aimed at estimating the role of other significant moderators, as supported by previous research. For instance, insecure attachment styles have been consistently associated to the onset of mental disorders or their worse outcome (Gumley et al., 2014; Pasalich et al., 2012). Adult attachment styles can be defined as patterns of interpersonal behaviors and relational expectations that originate from the internalization of the quality of the interactions with caregivers during infancy (Fraley & Shaver, 2000; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002). When these interactions are negative, the individual may develop a so-called insecure attachment style, which is characterized by high levels of attachment anxiety or avoidance (Bowlby, 1973; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2012). Attachment anxiety is characterized by a constantly activated state of vigilance, as a precautionary measure foreseeing the separation from partners or caregivers (Fraley et al., 2006), whereas attachment avoidance is associated to the tendency to dismiss otherwise desired emotional connections and strives for self-reliance (Carvallo & Gabriel, 2006; Norris et al., 2012). In contrast, secure attachment style is posited to result from the internalization of positive maternal/paternal models and is characterized by positive interpersonal expectations and functional emotion regulation strategies (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007, 2012). Relevantly, attachment patterns have been observed to moderate relationship functioning during COVID-19 quarantines, suggesting an erosion in success for social-oriented individual coping strategies (Overall et al., 2022).
For what concerns early negative events, childhood traumatic experiences have also been found to consistently moderate subjective responses to stressful circumstances (Maschi et al., 2013; Nöthling et al., 2020). Lockdowns, lack of access to essential services, and social isolation were all considered potentially significant stressors for traumatized individuals, as previous research showed a heightened tendency to react to stress among victims of abuse (Zhai et al., 2019). As attachment patterns and childhood traumatic experiences are among the most relevant factors explaining both fragility and resilience in response to mental distress (Hailes et al., 2019; Kuo et al., 2015; McKay et al., 2021), the authors analyzed their role in the development of unique longitudinal trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Aims
The present study aims at evaluating the differential impact of initial and prolonged COVID-19 pandemic in women, using a three time-point design (before pandemic, during first lockdown, after prolonged time). The primary endpoint was to report longitudinal outcome of psychopathology from pre-pandemic period to subsequent assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary endpoints were to quantify the moderation role of age, as well as adult attachment styles and childhood traumatic experiences.
Materials and Methods
This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. The protocol was firstly approved on the 8th of October 2019, as part of a general assessment of psychopathology in a control group (registration number CEAVC 14,655). Later amendments, due to the insurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic, were approved on the 14th of April of 2020 (registration number CEAVC 17063). All participants have given informed consent for participation in the research study.
Study design
This observational, longitudinal study involved subjects recruited in the Italian women population a few weeks before the first cases of COVID-19 in Italy (T0), who were then re-evaluated after the Italian Government declaration of lockdown (T1) (Decreto-Legge 9 Marzo 2020, n. 14, 2020) and after prolonged conditions of lockdown, insecurity, and persistence of COVID-19 (T2).
Participants
The sample was composed by a control group of women that was undergoing an assessment of general psychopathology in other studies by the same research group. All women were asked to provide consent for their participation. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling methods, with the following inclusion criteria: age between 18 and 60 years old, Italian nationality, and residency in Tuscany. Exclusion criteria included illiteracy or inability to provide consent or to complete the survey online, not being a woman, not having one evaluation at each timepoint.
Instruments
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983) is a self-reported 53-items questionnaire aimed at quantifying general psychopathological symptoms in adults over the previous 7 days. It provides a total score, Global Severity Index (GSI; Kellett et al., 2003), and 9 subscales: Somatization (Cronbach’s alpha 0.80, test–retest reliability 0.68), Obsession-Compulsion (Cronbach’s alpha 0.83, test–retest reliability 0.85), Interpersonal Sensitivity (Cronbach’s alpha 0.74, test–retest reliability 0.85), Depression (Cronbach’s alpha 0.85, test–retest reliability 0.84), Anxiety (Cronbach’s alpha 0.81, test–retest reliability 0.79), Hostility (Cronbach’s alpha 0.78, test–retest reliability 0.81), Phobic Anxiety (Cronbach’s alpha 0.77, test–retest reliability 0.91), Paranoid Ideation (Cronbach’s alpha 0.77, test–retest reliability 0.79), and Psychoticism (Cronbach’s alpha 0.71, test–retest reliability 0.78).
The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ; Bernstein et al., 2003) is a self-reported 28-items questionnaire aimed at measuring exposure to early trauma during childhood retrospectively among adults. The questionnaire measures exposure to early trauma through one total score and five domains (Sacchi et al., 2018): emotional neglect (ordinal alpha 0.91), emotional abuse (ordinal alpha 0.88), sexual abuse (ordinal alpha 0.96), physical neglect (ordinal alpha 0.87), and physical abuse (ordinal alpha 0.95). Higher scores represent higher exposure to early trauma.
Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire-Revised (ECR; Fraley et al., 2011) is a 36-items self-reported questionnaire aimed at evaluating the romantic attachment pattern in adult relationships. It quantifies two dimensions (18 items per domain), namely anxious (Cronbach’s alpha 0.88) and avoidant attachment (Cronbach’s alpha 0.79, Busonera et al., 2014).
Assessment
Three evaluations through self-assessment were administered. T0 was originally collected between the 1st of December 2019 and the 15th of January 2020 (45 days), as part of an observational study on the mental health status in the Tuscan general population. T1 was collected from the 22nd of April 2020 to the 3rd of June 2020 (42 days). Finally, T2 was collected between the 19th of October 2020 and the 20th of December 2020 (62 days). The last timepoint was collected over a longer period of time as to enhance completion. Sociodemographic data were collected at each time-point (age, sex, occupation, and educational level).
The questionnaires did not have an option to opt-out from specific questions or parts of the survey. All questions had to be filled before continuing, and all questions needed to be filled in order to submit the results. All evaluations, at any timepoint, included the following self-administered questionnaire: BSI (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983).
In order to evaluate the moderation effect of childhood traumatic experiences and abuse on the longitudinal trajectories, CTQ (Bernstein et al., 2003) was administered at T0. In order to evaluate the moderation effect of attachment patterns in light of the effect of stressors, ECR (Fraley et al., 2011) was administered at T0 as well.
Statistical analyses
In order to evaluate the impact of initial and prolonged conditions of insecurity due to COVID-19, a repeated measures approach was adopted for longitudinal analyses, using a Linear Mixed Model with random intercepts for each participant and time as a fixed effect.
The psychopathological domains of the CTQ questionnaire were evaluated for their moderation role in the longitudinal analyses. As to control for the role of attachment patterns in the longitudinal evolution of psychopathology of women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Anxiety and Avoidance dimensions of the ECR questionnaire were evaluated for their moderation role.
Additional Moderation Analyses
Additional analyses were carried forward, in accordance to previous literature on the risk factors for worsening mental status during the pandemic in the Italian general population (Delmastro & Zamariola, 2020; Rossi et al., 2020; Xiong et al., 2020). As to exclude the role of specific social determinants in the sample, linear mixed models were estimated. The moderation role of being a healthcare worker was evaluated, as well as having a bachelor’s degree (or higher) as education. As employment and work are main facets of daily life, and more so under conditions of lockdown, the moderation role of going out of the house for work was analyzed.
Results
Descriptive Statistics of the Sample
Three hundred three individual observations were collected in the longitudinal observations, representing 101 unique participants, each with one evaluation at each timepoint. The average age at T0 was 30 years old, with a standard deviation of 10.7. The proportion of healthcare workers in the sample was stable at all the three timepoints (meaning most healthcare workers continued working in the same field at all timepoints), and it was represented by 21 individuals (20.79%). The proportion of women having a partner or living with a partner was also stable at all three time points (72.28% and 29.70%, respectively, meaning most women did not change relationship status during the pandemic). The sample was composed by only women, and the majority of the sample was representative of a well-educated population (63.37% with a college degree at T0).
To be noted, the prevalence of having/having had a loved person infected with COVID-19 rapidly increased from T0 to T2 (from below 9 to 26.67%, Fisher exact test p < 0.01). The prevalence of having had a loved one hospitalized for COVID-19 or having had a loved one die for COVID, increased at T2 as well (from 1.98 to 8.89% for hospitalization, 0.99 to 2.22% for death).
Differential Effect of Initial and Prolonged Conditions of Pandemics
Multiple linear mixed models were calculated, with the effect of time as a fixed effect. The linear mixed models were modeled to predict the beta coefficients of T1 and T2 in respect to the baseline at T0. Beta coefficients for the fixed effect of time can be found in found in the text as Table 1 for BSI. Statistically significant scales for longitudinal observations were thus plotted in Fig. 1. In particular, the Somatization, the Interpersonal Sensitivity, and the Paranoid Ideation domains of BSI had an initial decline followed by a return to the mean of T0. On the contrary, the Depression domain of BSI showed a concordant trajectory at T1 and T2, with an initial increase followed by a stabilization on higher values in respect to the baseline. The Phobic Anxiety domain showed an initial increase in respect to the baseline at T1, elevated also at T2.
Longitudinal observations of psychopathology in women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, BSI scale. T0 before COVID-19 lockdowns, T1 during initial lockdowns, T2 after prolonged conditions of pandemics. On the first column, longitudinal observations were plotted as a function of time with an estimate for standard deviations. On the second column, estimates of time coefficients were plotted and associated p values annotated. The estimates of coefficients in the second columns are standardized by dividing them by two standard deviations. a Somatization domain of BSI. b Interpersonal Sensitivity domain of BSI. c Depression domain of BSI. d Phobic Anxiety domain of BSI. e Paranoid Ideation domain of BSI. Note: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), significance codes: “***” 0.001; “**” 0.01; “*” 0.05
Moderation Effect of Age
As to evaluate the moderation effect of age, linear mixed models were built using time, age, and time × age as fixed effects. Individual intercepts at T0 were allowed to be calculated.
As presented in Table 2, the interaction of age was significant at T1, during initial lockdown, for the Somatization, Obsession-Compulsion, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, Paranoid Ideation, and Global Severity Index domains. Increased age was protective against the severity index of psychopathology also at T2 for the Somatization and the Interpersonal Sensitivity domains.
The statistically significant results were plotted in Fig. 2. For all statistically significant interactions, increased age was protective.
Longitudinal observations of psychopathology in women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, BSI scale including the moderation role of age. T0 before COVID-19 lockdowns, T1 during initial lockdowns, T2 after prolonged conditions of pandemics. On the first column, longitudinal observations were plotted as a function of time with an estimate for standard deviations. On the second column, estimates of time coefficients were plotted and associated p values annotated. The estimates of coefficients in the second columns are standardized by dividing them by two standard deviations. Three colors represent age classes, blue for the mean age of the group, plus or minus a standard deviation (red and green, respectively). a Somatization domain of BSI. b Interpersonal Sensitivity domain of BSI. c Depression domain of BSI. d Obsession-Compulsion domain of BSI. e Paranoid Ideation domain of BSI. Note: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), significance codes: “***” 0.001; “**” 0.01; “*” 0.05
Moderation Effect of Attachment Patterns
The attachment patterns of Anxiety and Avoidance were evaluated. The domains obtained from the ECR questionnaire were evaluated in a dimensional manner, rather than categorical.
The Anxiety dimension of the ECR had a significant effect as a fixed effect for the Somatization (p 0.024), Obsession-Compulsion (p 0.003), Interpersonal Sensitivity (p < 0.001), Depression (p < 0.001). Anxiety (p 0.010), Paranoid Ideation (p 0.006), and the Psychoticism (p < 0.001) domains of the BSI, as well as the Global Severity Index (p < 0.001). No statistically significant interaction with time was found at T1, while at T2, the statistically significant interactions were with all domains with the exclusion of the Depression and Psychoticism domains. Results were reported in Table 3.
The Avoidance dimension had a significant effect for Obsession-Compulsion (p 0.001), Interpersonal Sensitivity (p 0.039), Depression (p 0.003), Anxiety (p < 0.001), Paranoid Ideation (p 0.020), Psychoticism (p < 0.001), and Global Severity Index (p < 0.001) as a fixed effect, but no statistically significant interaction with time.
The statistically significant results were plotted in Fig. 3. For all statistically significant interactions, the Anxiety style of attachment was detrimental.
Longitudinal observations of psychopathology in women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, BSI scale including the moderation role of the Anxiety Pattern of Adult Attachment. T0 before COVID-19 lockdowns, T1 during initial lockdowns, T2 after prolonged conditions of pandemics. On the first column, longitudinal observations were plotted as a function of time with an estimate for standard deviations. On the second column, estimates of time coefficients were plotted and associated p values annotated. The estimates of coefficients in the second columns are standardized by dividing them by two standard deviations. Three colors represent age classes, blue for the mean anxiety score of the group, plus or minus a standard deviation (red and green, respectively). a Somatization domain of BSI. b Obsession-Compulsion domain of BSI. c Interpersonal Sensitivity domain of BSI. d Anxiety domain of BSI. e Hostility domain of BSI. f Phobic Anxiety domain of BSI. g Paranoid Ideation domain of BSI. h Global Severity Index domain of BSI. Note: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), significance codes: “***” 0.001; “**” 0.01; “*” 0.05
Moderation Effect of Childhood Traumatic Experiences
The domains of the CTQ questionnaire were evaluated for their moderation role in the longitudinal analyses. All domains, apart from Sexual Abuse and Physical Neglect, had a significant role as a fixed effect for the Depression (Emotional Abuse p 0.028, Emotional Neglect p 0.012, Physical Abuse p 0.034), Hostility (Emotional Abuse p 0.001, Emotional Neglect p 0.037, Physical Abuse p 0.022), Interpersonal Sensitivity (Emotional Abuse p < 0.001, Emotional Neglect p 0.001, Physical Abuse p 0.017), Paranoid Ideation (Emotional Abuse p 0.001, Emotional Neglect p 0.022, Physical Abuse p 0.012), and the Global Severity Index domain (Emotional Abuse p < 0.001, Emotional Neglect p 0.023, Physical Abuse p 0.009).
For Emotional Abuse, a statistically significant fixed effect was also found for the Psychoticism domain (p 0.003). Emotional Neglect showed a statistically significant fixed effect for the Obsession-Compulsion (p 0.027) and the Psychoticism (p 0.048) domains.
For Physical Abuse, a statistically significant fixed effect was found for the Phobic Anxiety (p 0.023) and the Somatization (p 0.004) domains. Physical Neglect had a single statistically significant fixed effect for the Interpersonal Sensitivity domain (p 0.030). Sexual Abuse showed a marked different trend than the other domains of the CTQ questionnaire, as Physical Neglect it had a single statistically significant fixed effect for Interpersonal Sensitivity (p 0.037), but also showed significant interactions with time for the Anxiety and Hostility domains.
Results for Sexual Abuse interaction with time were plotted in Fig. 4 and described in Table 4.
Longitudinal observations of psychopathology in women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, BSI scale including the moderation role of the Childhood Sexual Abuse. T0 before COVID-19 lockdowns, T1 during initial lockdowns, T2 after prolonged conditions of pandemics. On the first column, longitudinal observations were plotted as a function of time with an estimate for standard deviations. On the second column, estimates of time coefficients were plotted and associated p values annotated. The estimates of coefficients in the second columns are standardized by dividing them by two standard deviations. Three colors represent age classes, blue for the mean sexual abuse score of the group, plus or minus a standard deviation (red and green, respectively). a Anxiety domain of BSI. b Hostility domain of BSI. Note: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), significance codes: “***” 0.001; “**” 0.01; “*” 0.05
Moderation Effect of Social Determinants
The moderation role of being a healthcare worker was evaluated, as well as having a bachelor’s degree or higher as education. No effect of education was statistically significant nor its interaction with time. The moderation role of going out of the house for work was analyzed. No significant effect was found for going out of the house for work nor its interaction with time.
Discussion
The current study aimed at evaluating the impact of initial and prolonged conditions of pandemic due to COVID-19 on the mental health status of women. Additionally, the role of individual moderators, according to the scientific literature on the topic, was explored. The present study offers rare descriptions of contrasts pre- and post-COVID-19, as a sample of women was enrolled in a previous study as a control group between the 1st of December 2019 and the 15th of January 2020. This first time-point can be reasonably used to infer the differential effects of initial and prolonged conditions of pandemics for what concerns the mental well-being of women enrolled in the sample.
Overall, the present study found concordant trajectories at the two follow-ups for most of the domains under investigation. In particular, at the second follow-up (acquired between October and December 2020), increased levels of Phobic Anxiety and Depression were found, signaling a potential long-lasting decay in the mental status of women. In contrast, other significant domains (Paranoid Ideation, Somatization, and Interpersonal Sensitivity) showed an initial worsening at T1, followed by amelioration and regression to baseline levels at T2.
A recent study provided evidence of differential effects before and after the pandemic on the mental health of the general population (Pierce et al., 2021). Although the study comprised a large sample of individuals, questionnaires were not specific for psychopathology. In fact, the General Health Questionnaire, especially in its short 12 questions form, is intended as a screening tool for use in primary care (Gnambs & Staufenbiel, 2018) and does not provide insight into distinct mental constructs. Nevertheless, current results corroborate previous findings (Pierce et al., 2021), as it was shown that a latent class of individuals with deteriorating mental health, or persistent poor mental health, during the pandemic was principally composed of women.
For what concerns individual moderators of distress, attachment theory has underpinned the research of long-term consequences on mental health, through the analysis of adopted interaction patterns acquired during childhood and adolescence (Prior & Glaser, 2006). Multiple studies confirmed the role of insecure attachment styles as a risk factor for mental disorders (Barnes & Theule, 2019; Dagan et al., 2018; Pallini et al., 2019), and one meta-analysis in particular focused on the role of secure attachment as a core feature for psychological resilience (Darling Rasmussen et al., 2019). Current results confirm that attachment patterns can moderate longitudinal trajectories of psychopathology, especially when considering the higher exposure to relationship conflicts, distance, or hastened cohabitation during the COVID-19 pandemic (Overall et al., 2022; Pietromonaco & Overall, 2021). In fact, periods of quarantine or prolonged lockdowns might have stressed anxious individuals imposing protracted extents of time separated by partners or caregivers (Gruber et al., 2021). As women were previously observed as more likely to adopt social-oriented coping strategies in comparison to males (Mélendez et al., 2012; Tamres et al., 2002), longer isolation periods may have interfered with the successful management of harmful stress in this population. Furthermore, the coping mechanisms of individuals characterized by avoidant attachment styles may have been taxed by sustained and hastened co-habitation (Gruber et al., 2021).
Secondarily, the role of early traumatic experiences during childhood was explored. Although a wide range of studies suggested emotional abuse as a consistent risk factor for diminished mental resilience (Christ et al., 2019; Dye, 2020; Glaser, 2002; Norman et al., 2012), the present study focused on the longitudinal evolution of general psychopathological domains during a time of worldwide natural disaster and its results were not easily predictable by previously published research articles. What the authors found was that emotional abuse could be accounted as a fixed factor at baseline, as emotionally abused women exhibited increased scores of mental distress at the first evaluation. However, emotional abuse was not observed to significantly moderate differential trajectories in time. Other forms of traumatic experiences (either active as physical abuse, or passive as physical or emotional neglect) were observed as fixed effects for differences between women at baseline, but similarly they also did not show a moderating role for trajectories in time. On the contrary, unwanted sexual experiences during childhood had a significant role for the psychopathology of women both as a fixed effect and as a moderating factor. In fact, increased levels of mental distress were found among sexually abused women at the first evaluation, and differential trajectories through time (worse outcome) were observed for what concerns Anxiety and Hostility. The results of the present study seem to confirm previous literature on the topic, which consistently found worse outcomes for sexually abused women rather than other forms of trauma (Chen et al., 2010; Hailes et al., 2019; Lindert et al., 2014; Maniglio, 2013).
In conclusion, other moderators supported by previous literature were evaluated. Higher educational status was not significantly correlated with mental distress levels at baseline, and it did not moderate distress trajectories through time. Similarly, healthcare workers were not observed as exhibiting significantly different levels of distress either at baseline or subsequent follow-ups, in comparison to the other participants. Comparably, individuals working from home did not show significantly different levels of distress at baseline, and differential trajectories in mental health through time were also not observed in comparison to other participants.
Limitations
T0 was collected between the 1st of December 2019 and the 15th of January 2020, when COVID-19 was already known to have spread rapidly outside of China, the authors would then caution when considering T0 to be partially influenced by an initial impact on the mental health reported in the sample. The authors’ opinion is that the estimated effect on the general psychopathology was therefore biased towards a more neutral approximation. T2 was collected over a wider timespan as compared to T1 in order to enhance completion. The sample size was small, and mostly representative of a highly educated population, thus cautioning generalization to the broader community.
Conclusions
The present study confirms that Italian women experienced a high burden of distress during COVID-19. Attachment insecurity and traumatic experiences were found to have a significant effect in the interplay between stress and stressors in the sample. Additional individual moderators were evaluated — educational status, being a healthcare worker, work from home — and none of these social determinants resulted significant for explaining longitudinal psychopathological trajectories. The clinical utility of the present study lies in the evidence of the role of attachment patterns and childhood traumatic experiences in the development and maintenance of mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. This evidence may warrant a future focus in the clinical setting for the collection of accurate personal history components, in order to better evaluate individual risk factors and to provide adequate treatment interventions.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, G.C., upon reasonable request.
Change history
24 July 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
References
Barnes, J., & Theule, J. (2019). Maternal depression and infant attachment security: A meta-analysis. Infant Mental Health Journal, 40(6), 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21812
Benatti, B., Albert, U., Maina, G., Fiorillo, A., Celebre, L., Girone, N., Fineberg, N., Bramante, S., Rigardetto, S., & Dell’Osso, B. (2020). What happened to patients with obsessive compulsive disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multicentre report from tertiary clinics in Northern Italy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00720
Benight, C. C., Swift, E., Sanger, J., Smith, A., & Zeppelin, D. (1999). Coping self-efficacy as a mediator of distress following a natural disaster. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2443–2464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00120.x
Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
Busonera, A., Martini, P. S., Zavattini, G. C., & Santona, A. (2014). Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the experiences in close relationships-revised (ECR-R) scale. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.21.PR0.114k23w9
Carvallo, M., & Gabriel, S. (2006). No man is an island: The need to belong and dismissing avoidant attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205285451
Castellini, G., Cassioli, E., Rossi, E., Innocenti, M., Gironi, V., Sanfilippo, G., Felciai, F., Monteleone, A. M., & Ricca, V. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 epidemic on eating disorders: A longitudinal observation of pre versus post psychopathological features in a sample of patients with eating disorders and a group of healthy controls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(11), 1855–1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23368
Castellini, G., Rossi, E., Cassioli, E., Sanfilippo, G., Innocenti, M., Gironi, V., Silvestri, C., Voller, F., & Ricca, V. (2021). A longitudinal observation of general psychopathology before the COVID-19 outbreak and during lockdown in Italy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 141, 110328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110328
Chen, L. P., Murad, M. H., Paras, M. L., Colbenson, K. M., Sattler, A. L., Goranson, E. N., Elamin, M. B., Seime, R. J., Shinozaki, G., Prokop, L. J., & Zirakzadeh, A. (2010). Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 85(7), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2009.0583
Christ, C., de Waal, M. M., Dekker, J. J. M., van Kuijk, I., van Schaik, D. J. F., Kikkert, M. J., Goudriaan, A. E., Beekman, A. T. F., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2019). Linking childhood emotional abuse and depressive symptoms: The role of emotion dysregulation and interpersonal problems. PLoS One, 14(2), e0211882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211882
Copeland, W. E., McGinnis, E., Bai, Y., Adams, Z., Nardone, H., Devadanam, V., Rettew, J., & Hudziak, J. J. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health and wellness. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(1), 134-141.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.466
Dagan, O., Facompré, C. R., & Bernard, K. (2018). Adult attachment representations and depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 236, 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.091
Darling Rasmussen, P., Storebø, O. J., Løkkeholt, T., Voss, L. G., Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Bojesen, A. B., Simonsen, E., & Bilenberg, N. (2019). Attachment as a core feature of resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 122(4), 1259–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118785577
Decreto-Legge 9 marzo 2020, n. 14, 20G00030, Gazzetta Unica N .62 (2020). https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/09/20G00030/sg
Delmastro, M., & Zamariola, G. (2020). Depressive symptoms in response to COVID-19 and lockdown: A cross-sectional study on the Italian population. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 22457. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79850-6
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13(3), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700048017
Dye, H. L. (2020). Is emotional abuse as harmful as physical and/or sexual abuse? Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 13(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-00292-y
Fiorillo, A., & Gorwood, P. (2020). The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 63(1), e32. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.35
Fiorillo, A., Sampogna, G., Giallonardo, V., Del Vecchio, V., Luciano, M., Albert, U., Carmassi, C., Carrà, G., Cirulli, F., Dell’Osso, B., Nanni, M. G., Pompili, M., Sani, G., Tortorella, A., & Volpe, U. (2020). Effects of the lockdown on the mental health of the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: Results from the COMET collaborative network. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 63(1), e87. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.89
Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships-relationship structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898
Fraley, R. C., Niedenthal, P. M., Marks, M., Brumbaugh, C., & Vicary, A. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 1163–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00406.x
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
Giallonardo, V., Sampogna, G., Del Vecchio, V., Luciano, M., Albert, U., Carmassi, C., Carrà, G., Cirulli, F., Dell’Osso, B., Nanni, M. G., Pompili, M., Sani, G., Tortorella, A., Volpe, U., & Fiorillo, A. (2020). The impact of quarantine and physical distancing following COVID-19 on mental health: Study protocol of a multicentric Italian population trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00533
Glaser, D. (2002). Emotional abuse and neglect (psychological maltreatment): A conceptual framework. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(6–7), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00342-3
Gloster, A. T., Lamnisos, D., Lubenko, J., Presti, G., Squatrito, V., Constantinou, M., Nicolaou, C., Papacostas, S., Aydın, G., Chong, Y. Y., Chien, W. T., Cheng, H. Y., Ruiz, F. J., Garcia-Martin, M. B., Obando-Posada, D. P., Segura-Vargas, M. A., Vasiliou, V. S., McHugh, L., Höfer, S., …, Karekla, M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study. PloS One, 15(12), e0244809.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244809
Gnambs, T., & Staufenbiel, T. (2018). The structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Two meta-analytic factor analyses. Health Psychology Review, 12(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1426484
Gruber, J., Prinstein, M. J., Clark, L. A., Rottenberg, J., Abramowitz, J. S., Albano, A. M., Aldao, A., Borelli, J. L., Chung, T., Davila, J., Forbes, E. E., Gee, D. G., Hall, G. C. N., Hallion, L. S., Hinshaw, S. P., Hofmann, S. G., Hollon, S. D., Joormann, J., Kazdin, A. E., …, Weinstock, L. M. (2021). Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action. American Psychologist, 76(3), 409–426.https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000707
Gumley, A. I., Schwannauer, M., Macbeth, A., Fisher, R., Clark, S., Rattrie, L., Fraser, G., McCabe, R., Blair, A., Davidson, K., & Birchwood, M. (2014). Insight, duration of untreated psychosis and attachment in first-episode psychosis: Prospective study of psychiatric recovery over 12-month follow-up. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 205(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126722
Hailes, H. P., Yu, R., Danese, A., & Fazel, S. (2019). Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: An umbrella review. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 6(10), 830–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30286-X
Hossain, M. M., Tasnim, S., Sultana, A., Faizah, F., Mazumder, H., Zou, L., McKyer, E. L. J., Ahmed, H. U., & Ma, P. (2020). Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: A review. F1000Research, 9, 636. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24457.1
Kellett, S., Beail, N., Newman, D. W., & Frankish, P. (2003). Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory in the assessment of psychological distress. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00152.x
Kuo, J. R., Khoury, J. E., Metcalfe, R., Fitzpatrick, S., & Goodwill, A. (2015). An examination of the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and borderline personality disorder features: The role of difficulties with emotion regulation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 39, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.008
Lindert, J., von Ehrenstein, O. S., Grashow, R., Gal, G., Braehler, E., & Weisskopf, M. G. (2014). Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 59(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0519-5
Loades, M. E., Chatburn, E., Higson-Sweeney, N., Reynolds, S., Shafran, R., Brigden, A., Linney, C., McManus, M. N., Borwick, C., & Crawley, E. (2020). Rapid Systematic review: The impact of social isolation and loneliness on the mental health of children and adolescents in the context of COVID-19. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(11), 1218-1239.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.009
Maniglio, R. (2013). Child sexual abuse in the etiology of anxiety disorders: A systematic review of reviews. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 14(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470032
Maschi, T., Baer, J., Morrissey, M. B., & Moreno, C. (2013). The aftermath of childhood trauma on late life mental and physical health: A review of the literature. Traumatology, 19(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765612437377
McKay, M. T., Cannon, M., Chambers, D., Conroy, R. M., Coughlan, H., Dodd, P., Healy, C., O’Donnell, L., & Clarke, M. C. (2021). Childhood trauma and adult mental disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 143(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13268
Meda, N., Pardini, S., Slongo, I., Bodini, L., Zordan, M. A., Rigobello, P., Visioli, F., & Novara, C. (2021). Students’ mental health problems before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 134, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.045
Mélendez, J., Mayordomo, T., Sancho, P., & Tomás, J. (2012). Coping strategies: Gender differences and development throughout life span. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5209/REV_SJOP.2012.V15.N3.39399
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 11(1), 11–15.
Nearchou, F., Flinn, C., Niland, R., Subramaniam, S. S., & Hennessy, E. (2020). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on mental health outcomes in children and adolescents: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228479
Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 9(11), e1001349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349
Norris, J. I., Lambert, N. M., Nathan DeWall, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Can’t buy me love?: Anxious attachment and materialistic values. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 666–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.009
Nöthling, J., Malan-Müller, S., Abrahams, N., Hemmings, S. M. J., & Seedat, S. (2020). Epigenetic alterations associated with childhood trauma and adult mental health outcomes: A systematic review. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 21(7), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2019.1583369
Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., Pietromonaco, P. R., Low, R. S. T., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2022). Partners’ attachment insecurity and stress predict poorer relationship functioning during COVID-19 quarantines. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621992973
Pallini, S., Morelli, M., Chirumbolo, A., Baiocco, R., Laghi, F., & Eisenberg, N. (2019). Attachment and attention problems: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 74, 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101772
Pasalich, D. S., Dadds, M. R., Hawes, D. J., & Brennan, J. (2012). Attachment and callous-unemotional traits in children with early-onset conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(8), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02544.x
Pierce, M., McManus, S., Hope, H., Hotopf, M., Ford, T., Hatch, S. L., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R. T., Wessely, S., & Abel, K. M. (2021). Mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent class trajectory analysis using longitudinal UK data. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(7), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00151-6
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Overall, N. C. (2021). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
Prior, V., & Glaser, D. (2006). Understanding attachment & attachment disorders: Theory, evidence, and practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247467/.
Rettie, H., & Daniels, J. (2021). Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and mediators of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(3), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000710
Rogowska, A. M., Ochnik, D., Kuśnierz, C., Chilicka, K., Jakubiak, M., Paradowska, M., Głazowska, L., Bojarski, D., Fijołek, J., Podolak, M., Tomasiewicz, M., Nowicka, D., Kawka, M., Grabarczyk, M., & Babińska, Z. (2021). Changes in mental health during three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional study among polish university students. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 627. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03615-2
Rossi, R., Socci, V., Talevi, D., Mensi, S., Niolu, C., Pacitti, F., Di Marco, A., Rossi, A., Siracusano, A., & Di Lorenzo, G. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00790
Sacchi, C., Vieno, A., & Simonelli, A. (2018). Italian validation of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form on a college group. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 10(5), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000333
Sepúlveda-Loyola, W., Rodríguez-Sánchez, I., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Ganz, F., Torralba, R., Oliveira, D. V., & Rodríguez-Mañas, L. (2020). Impact of social isolation due to COVID-19 on health in older people: Mental and physical effects and recommendations. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 24(9), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1469-2
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4(2), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730210154171
Stanton, A. L., & Franz, R. (1999). Focusing on emotion: An adaptive coping strategy? In Coping: The Psychology of What Works (1st ed., pp. 90–118). Oxford University Press
Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1
Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M. W., Gill, H., Phan, L., Chen-Li, D., Iacobucci, M., Ho, R., Majeed, A., & McIntyre, R. S. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001
Zhai, Z. W., Yip, S. W., Lacadie, C. M., Sinha, R., Mayes, L. C., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). Childhood trauma moderates inhibitory control and anterior cingulate cortex activation during stress. NeuroImage, 185, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.049
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.C., L.T., E.C. and E.R. conceived and planned the experiments. Data collection was performed by E.R., E.C., G.S., M.I., V.G., I.S. Material preparation and statistical analysis were performed by L.T. with the contribute of E.C. A contribute to the interpretation of the results was given by all the authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by L.T under the supervision of G.C. and V.R. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
All procedures followed were in accordance with national and international ethical standards of the on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The Ethics Committee of the local Institution approved the study protocol.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Castellini, G., Tarchi, L., Cassioli, E. et al. Attachment Style and Childhood Traumatic Experiences Moderate the Impact of Initial and Prolonged COVID-19 Pandemic: Mental Health Longitudinal Trajectories in a Sample of Italian Women. Int J Ment Health Addiction 21, 3393–3412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00798-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00798-x