Abstract
This paper describes the plasmonic modes in the parabolic cylinder geometry as a theoretical complement to the previous paper (J Phys A 42:185401) that considered the modes in the circular paraboloidal geometry. In order to identify the plasmonic modes in the parabolic cylinder geometry, analytic solutions for surface plasmon polaritons are examined by solving the wave equation for the magnetic field in parabolic cylindrical coordinates using quasi-separation of variables in combination with perturbation methods. The examination of the zeroth-order perturbation equations showed that solutions cannot exist for the parabolic metal wedge but can be obtained for the parabolic metal groove as standing wave solutions indicated by the even and odd symmetries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Metallic tapered waveguides have attracted considerable attention as a possible experimental structure for the waveguides in achieving deep subwavelength confinement not only in optical region [1, 2] but also in terahertz (THz) region [3–5]. Theoretical investigation of the metallic tapered waveguides has been conducted so far in the context of superfocusing beyond the diffraction limit of focused electromagnetic waves [6–8]. Superfocusing in metallic tapered waveguides originates from two remarkable theoretical papers [9, 10] in 1997 regarding the peculiarities of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) [11, 12] known as electromagnetic waves propagating along a metal-dielectric interface. The first [9] predicted subwavelength waveguides of SPPs by J. Takahara (one of the present authors) and his colleagues, whereas the second [10] introduced the concept of superfocusing for SPPs at the apexes of metallic tapered waveguides. These papers together provide a complete conceptual description of SPPs in metallic tapered waveguides at both extreme sides. A substantive issue in theoretical physics is to identify the plasmonic modes in metallic tapered waveguides that clarify the intermediate behavior of SPPs propagating from an infinite distance to the apex of tapered waveguides.
Our approach to finding plasmonic modes in metallic tapered waveguides is to solve a wave equation by the quasi-separation of variables (QSOV) [13–15] in combination with the use of perturbation methods, which is based on the idea of smoothly connecting analytic solutions at both extreme sides of metallic tapered waveguides. The QSOV technique was first applied to conical geometry [13] and then to wedge-shaped geometry [14], with unprecedented results of plasmonic modes that enable us to consider superfocusing properties with respect to the taper angle in conical- and wedge-shaped geometries. A remaining important topic in metallic tapered waveguides is to investigate the effect of round tips of tapered waveguides, which is very difficult to consider using conventional analytical methods based on classical separation of variables (CSOV) such as the geometrical-optics (GO) approximation (also called adiabatic approximation) [16–27] and local separation of variables (LSOV) approximation [10, 28–31]. In a previous paper [15], we successfully applied the QSOV technique to a circular paraboloidal geometry, which is one of the simplest tapered geometries with a finite tip radius, allowing us to discover that despite the metallic tapered waveguide, superfocusing does not take place in this geometry. Some of the knowledge is practically useful for analysis of THz experimental results in the circular paraboloidal geometry [32]. To properly understand the effect of round tips of metallic tapered waveguides, more theoretical investigation using the QSOV technique is needed into the tapered geometries with finite tip radii.
In this paper, we describe a theoretical investigation of plasmonic modes in a parabolic cylinder geometry by solving the wave equation for the magnetic field by means of the QSOV in combination with perturbation methods. We observed that plasmonic modes cannot exist for the parabolic metal wedge but can be obtained for the parabolic metal groove as standing waves classified by even and odd symmetries. This result is remarkably similar to that in the circular paraboloidal geometry [15], where we previously observed that the plasmonic modes cannot exist for the metallic solid paraboloid but can be obtained for the metallic hollow paraboloid as standing waves. Importantly, the superfocusing does not take place in the parabolic cylinder geometry as well as in the circular paraboloidal geometry [15]; hence, from a parabolical standpoint, the present paper is interrelated and complementary to the previous paper [15] treating the circular paraboloidal geometry. The new knowledge obtained in this paper is a fundamental building block in plasmonics and is practically useful for explaining numerical simulation through metallic subwavelength structures consisting partly of parabolic cylinder geometry, as described in [33–35].
Quasi-Separation of Variables Applied to the Wave Equation for a Magnetic Field
We consider two parabolic cylinder structures: a metallic parabolic cylinder surrounded by a dielectric and a dielectric parabolic cylinder surrounded by metal. In this paper, these are simply called a parabolic metal wedge and a parabolic metal groove, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, the parabolic cylindrical coordinates (ξ, η, z) can be used to describe an infinite parabolic cylinder with permittivity ε 1, and surrounded by matter with permittivity ε 2. The parabolic cylindrical coordinates are related to the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) according to the following transformations [36–38]:
Geometry of a parabolic cylinder structure for the parabolic metal wedge and the parabolic metal groove. ρ 0 is the radius of curvature for the parabolic cylinder structure at the apex. ε 1 and ε 2 are the permittivities inside and outside the parabolic cylinder, respectively. H z is the magnetic field of SPPs with translational symmetry about the z-axis. E ξ and E η are the electric fields of the radial and angular components, respectively, induced by the magnetic filed H z . \( +\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \) and \( -\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \) are the equations for the upper and lower surfaces, respectively, of the parabolic cylinder structure. Geometric dimensions of the x- and y-axes are normalized by the wavelength in vacuum, λ 0
where λ 0 is the wavelength of interest in vacuum used for a scale factor. We here choose for the y-coordinate of (1) to take \( \sqrt{\xi } \) as positive; we must then take \( \sqrt{\eta } \) with the positive sign on the semi-parabola above the x-axis and with the negative sign on the lower semi-parabola (see Fig. 1). Curves of constant \( \sqrt{\xi } \) and \( \sqrt{\eta } \) in the cross-section of the x-y plane for (1) are shown in Fig. 2, where all of the parabolas that open in the direction of the negative x-axis are full parabolas to which a single value of \( \sqrt{\xi } \) within the interval \( 0\le \sqrt{\xi }<\infty \), i.e., 0 ≤ ξ < ∞, is assigned, while the parabolas that open in the direction of the positive x-axis are regarded as consisting of two semi-parabolas: the upper one is described by \( +\sqrt{\eta } \) and the lower one by \( -\sqrt{\eta } \) so that \( \sqrt{\eta } \) has the interval \( -\infty <\sqrt{\eta }<+\infty \) [38]. Therefore, all the points in Fig. 2 are uniquely assigned to both ξ and \( \sqrt{\eta } \), where 0 ≤ ξ < ∞ and \( -\infty <\sqrt{\eta }<+\infty \). For the parabola of Fig. 1, the upper and lower semi-parabolas are indicated by \( +\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \) and \( -\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \), respectively. The vertex point of the parabola in Fig. 1 is indicated by x/λ 0 = − η 0/2 on the x-axis. From the formula for the curvature of space curves (for examples, see Section 9.1.2–6 in [39]), we see that the radius of curvature, ρ 0, at the apex point of the parabola has the relation
In the case where the imaginary parts of the permittivities are ignored, we have the conditions ε 1 < 0, ε 2 > 0 for the parabolic metal wedge and the conditions ε 1 > 0, ε 2 < 0 for the parabolic metal groove. Here, we examine simple plasmonic modes with translational symmetry about the z-axis, whose magnetic field at time t at the point located by the coordinate vector x is H(x, t) directed along the z-axis and depend on the intervals ξ ∈ [0, ∞) and \( \sqrt{\eta}\in \left(-\infty, \infty \right) \); therefore, it is written as
in the parabolic cylindrical coordinate system. Assuming the harmonic time dependence e − iωt, we can write
where ω is the angular frequency of interest. Combining the two Maxwell curl equations without any sources, we find the wave equation for the magnetic field in (4):
where c is the velocity of light in vacuum. After using the relation λ 0 ω/c = 2π, Eq. (5) can be rewritten as [37]
with the definition of the magnetic field \( {H}_z\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta}\right) \) in the regions of permittivities ε 1 and ε 2 as \( {H}_{z1}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta}\right) \) and \( {H}_{z2}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta}\right) \), respectively. In (6), the magnetic field may be classified into even (+) or odd (−) symmetries with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \), because the geometrical structure in Fig. 1 is invariant for the reflection in the η = 0 plane \( \left(\sqrt{\xi}\to \sqrt{\xi },\sqrt{\eta}\to -\sqrt{\eta },z\to z\right) \) and the differential operator of the wave Eq. (6) is even under its reflection transformation. Accordingly, we express the magnetic field for even (+) and odd (−) symmetries such as \( {H}_z^{+}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta}\right) \) and \( {H}_z^{-}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta}\right) \), respectively. As in previous papers [13–15], here we look for solutions in the following form by using quasi-separation of variables:
with the boundary conditions
to determine Η s j (η, ξ) uniquely, where s indicates either the even (+) or odd (−) symmetry with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \), i.e.,
(double-sign corresponds). Substituting (7) into (6), we get for j = 1, 2 that
Since the left side of (10) depends on ξ alone, while the right side depends on both ξ and η, both sides must depend on ξ alone. Setting both sides equal to ζ j (ξ) for j = 1, 2 and rearranging terms in each equation, we obtain the radial equations
and the angular equations
where
Here, ζ s j (ξ) for j = 1, 2 are called quasi-separation invariants, or simply separation quantities, which are analogous to the separation constants in classical separation of variables (CSOV). Now, we can replace (6) with (11) and (12), which satisfy the boundary conditions of (8).
Unification of the Radial Equations in the Two Regions
The radial equations (11) are separately expressed in two different regions j = 1, 2. Remarkably, those equations can be transformed into a unified form independent of the regions by considering the limiting cases ξ → 0 + and ξ → ∞.
For ξ → 0 +, since the conditions, \( \left|{\zeta}_j^s(0)\right|\gg 4{\pi}^2\left|{\varepsilon}_j\right|{\left(\sqrt{\xi}\right)}^2 \), are acceptable unless ζ j (0) = 0, Eq. (11) become
in which the material terms ε j are lost and therefore the different expressions in the regions j = 1, 2 are a superfluity of equations. Then, by setting ζ s u (0) = ζ s j (0) and Ξ s u (ξ) = Ξ s j (ξ) for ξ → 0 +, we describe (14) as
in the unified notation for the two different regions. Equation (15) is used to investigate asymptotic solutions for Ξ s u (ξ) as ξ → 0 +. Two nontrivial linearly independent particular solutions to (15) are given by
with the definition \( \nu =\sqrt{\zeta_u^s(0)} \). Remembering the time dependence e − iωt in (4), we see that \( \exp \left(i\nu \sqrt{\xi}\right) \) and \( \exp \left(-i\nu \sqrt{\xi}\right) \) in (16) correspond to the outgoing and incoming waves, respectively (the use of this condition may seem strange for a discussion of the condition ξ → 0 +), but it is very useful for characterization as seen in “Boundary Conditions for the Radial and Extended Angular Functions” section for ξ → ∞ when ν > 0.
For ξ → ∞, since the physical situation is considered the same as for SPPs in planar geometry, (11) can be described with a unified notation for the two regions j = 1, 2 in the form Ξ s u (ξ) = Ξ s j (ξ) and this unified radial function satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation conditions [40]:
where \( r=\sqrt{x^2+{y}^2} \), and k p is the wave number of SPPs in the planar geometry, given [41, 42] by \( {k}_p={k}_0\sqrt{\varepsilon_1{\varepsilon}_2/\left({\varepsilon}_1+{\varepsilon}_2\right)} \) with the wave number in vacuum, k 0, defined by k 0 = ω/c. Using (1), we can transform (17) into the form
This equation allows us to choose simple candidates for the unified radial function in the form, Ξ s u (ξ) = exp(±iλ 0 k p ξ/2) for ξ → ∞, which, unfortunately, do not belong to a class of solutions for (11). Then, carefully choosing for (18) that Ξ s u (ξ) = ξ − 1/4 exp(±iλ 0 k p ξ/2) for ξ → ∞, we obtain their differential equation
or
under the acceptable condition, \( {\lambda}_0^2{k}_p^2{\left(\sqrt{\xi}\right)}^2\gg 3/4{\left(\sqrt{\xi}\right)}^2 \) for ξ → ∞. Since (20) can be derived from (11) by using the unified notation of Ξ s u (ξ) = Ξ s j (ξ) and setting \( {\zeta}_j^s\left(\xi \right)={\lambda}_0^2{\beta}_j^2{\left(\sqrt{\xi}\right)}^2 \) with \( {\beta}_j=\sqrt{k_p^2-{\varepsilon}_j{k}_0^2} \) for j = 1, 2, Eq. (20) is regarded as the limiting equation of (11) for ξ → ∞.
Now, we are ready to look for a unified form of (11) by following an inversion process of finding the limiting Eqs. (15) and (20) as ξ → 0 + and ξ → ∞, respectively. A simple candidate for the unified radial equation is given by
which approaches (15) and (20) as ξ → 0 + and ξ → ∞, respectively. Then, we can find without difficulty that more general candidate is given by
where A s(ξ) is arbitrary only if A s(ξ) → 0 as ξ → 0 and A s(ξ)/ξ → 0 as ξ → ∞. By setting A s(ξ) = ζ s u (ξ) − ζ s u (0), we can rewrite (22) as
where ζ s u (ξ) satisfies the condition ζ s u (ξ)/ξ → 0 as ξ → ∞. Comparing (23) with (11), we find that the unification conditions are given by
which allows for the unified notation of the radial functions as follows:
Further discussion on the unified radial Eq. (23) would require more detailed information on the unified separation quantity ζ s u (ξ), which can be determined from the boundary conditions.
Boundary Conditions for the Radial and Extended Angular Functions
In the preceding section, we showed that original radial Eq. (11) can be simplified into the unified radial Eq. (23), in which the unified radial function for ξ → 0 + can be expressed by a linear combination of the outgoing wave, \( \exp \left(i\nu \sqrt{\xi}\right) \), and the incoming wave, \( \exp \left(-i\nu \sqrt{\xi}\right) \), as seen in (16). In this case, the unified radial function Ξ s u (ξ) is divided into an incoming part, Ξ s in (ξ), and an outgoing part, Ξ s out (ξ); that is
which satisfies the boundary condition
By choosing
and substituting (28) into (26), we obtain the boundary condition of the unified radial function as follows:
where H 0 is the complex amplitude of the magnetic field to be determined by the initial conditions.
In order to obtain the boundary condition of the angular functions, we can use the continuity of the radial electric field at the metal-dielectric surface (\( +\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \)). The Ampére-Maxwell equation in the absence of current density allows us to describe the electric field as a function of the magnetic filed. Since the magnetic field is given by (3), the electric field E(x, t) can be described as
in which we see from (4) that
Each component of the electric field is described by using the magnetic field as
where the superscript j = 1, 2 indicates the region of permittivities ε 1 and ε 2, respectively. Substituting (7) into (32), and using (25), we can rewrite the radial electric field for j = 1, 2 as
which is continuous at the metal-dielectric surface (\( +\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \)). Hence, we find the following expression for the boundary conditions of the angular functions:
Note that the continuity of the radial electric field on the other metal-dielectric surface (\( -\sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \)) is automatically satisfied when the magnetic field has either even (+) or odd (−) symmetries with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \).
Application of Perturbation Methods for Solving the Extended Angular Equations
According to (24) and (25), the extended angular Eqs. (12) and (13) for j = 1, 2 can be simplified to the forms
In spite of this simplification, we still face difficulty with the fact that (36) and (37) include the as-yet-to-be-determined unified radial function Ξ s u (ξ). Moreover, we still face a basic difficulty in solving such a complicated partial differential equation (PDE) containing first- and second-order partial derivatives with respect to \( \sqrt{\xi } \) and a second-order partial derivatives with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \). To overcome these difficulties, we apply perturbation methods to the extended angular Eq. (36) by treating \( {F}_j^s\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) on the right side as a perturbing term because an exact solution can be found for the left side. According to the perturbation theory [43], we introduce the perturbation parameter 0 ≤ δ ≤ 1 into (36) by replacing \( {F}_j^s\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) with \( \delta {F}_j^s\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) on the right side and look for solutions of the perturbed equation of the form
Accordingly, ζ s u (ξ) and Ξ s u (ξ) should be described as
respectively. For Ξ u (ξ), the incoming Ξ in (ξ) and the outgoing Ξ out (ξ) should also be described as
respectively. Substituting (38)–(40) into the perturbed equation, and setting the coefficients of the powers of δ equal to each other, we have a system of equations for \( {H}_j^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), \( {H}_j^{s(1)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \),…, in the power series of (38); for coefficient of δ 0, we have
Setting \( \sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \) in (38) and using (8), we obtain for j = 1, 2 that
which leads to the following Dirichlet boundary conditions
by setting the coefficients of the powers of δ equal to each other in (44). In a similar manner, by substituting (38) into (35), we obtain the following Neumann boundary conditions
Note that the imposition of both the Dirichlet (45) and Neumann boundary conditions (46) is referred to as the Cauchy boundary conditions [44]; that is, we specify the values and normal derivatives of the functions \( {H}_j^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), \( {H}_j^{s(1)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \),…, in the power series (38) along the metal-dielectric boundary (\( \sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \)).
Perturbation methods should also be applied to the unified radial Eq. (23). Substituting (39) and (40) into the unified radial Eq. (23) and equating the coefficients of like powers of δ on both sides, we have a system of equations for Ξ s(0) u (ξ), Ξ s(1) u (ξ),…, in the power series (40); for coefficient of δ 0, we have
Substituting (40) into (29), and setting the coefficients of the powers of δ equal to each other, we have the following Dirichlet boundary conditions:
In a similar manner, by substituting (40)–(42) into (26), we have the following relations:
Similarly, by substituting (41) and (42) into (27), we have the following Dirichlet boundary conditions:
Summing up the points we have discussed in this section, we arrive at a sequence of problems, P 0, P 1, P 2,…, from which we can find the function sets \( \left\{{\zeta}_u^{s(n)}\left(\xi \right),{\varXi}_u^{s(n)}\left(\xi \right),{H}_1^{s(n)}\left(\eta, \xi \right),{H}_2^{s(n)}\left(\eta, \xi \right)\right\} \) for n = 0, 1, 2, … in sequence; the problem P 0 is given by
The higher-order problems, P 1, P 2,…, are not shown here because they are not treated in this paper due to some difficulties involved in numerical calculations.
Zeroth-Order Approximate Solutions for the Parabolic Metal Groove
Extended Angular Functions of the Zeroth-Order for the Parabolic Metal Groove
The zeroth-order extended angular Eq. (43) are considered for the parabolic metal groove, in which we can write ε 1 = ε d and ε 2 = ε m by introducing notations of metallic permittivity ε m < 0 and dielectric permittivity ε d > 0. The solutions to (43) must be divided into even (+) and odd (−) symmetries with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \), described as \( {H}_j^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) and \( {H}_j^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), respectively, for j = 1, 2.
Substituting ε 1 = ε d (> 0) into the zeroth-order extended angular Eq. (43) for j = 1, we have
where \( {\beta}_d=\sqrt{k_p^2-{\varepsilon}_d{k}_0^2} \). Dividing (52) by 4πε 1/2 d and rearranging terms, we obtain
which is a special case of the modified parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.7) corresponding to the parameter values
Since the solutions to (53) must be divided into even (+) and odd (−) symmetries with respect to \( \sqrt{\eta } \), written as \( {H}_1^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) and \( {H}_1^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), respectively, by taking into account the boundary conditions \( {H}_1^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta_0},\xi \right)=1 \) for s =+, − in (51), we can describe the solutions to (53) as
where w 1 and w 2 are even and odd functions, respectively (see Appendix A).
In a similar way, by substituting ε 2 = ε m (< 0) into (43) for j = 2, we have
where \( {\beta}_m=\sqrt{k_p^2-{\varepsilon}_m{k}_0^2} \). Dividing (57) by 4π|ε m |1/2 and rearranging terms, we obtain
which is a special case of the parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.1) corresponding to the parameter values
Since \( {H}_2^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) for s =+, − tends to zero as \( \sqrt{\eta}\to \pm \infty \) and must satisfy the boundary conditions \( {H}_2^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta_0},\xi \right)=1 \) for s =+, − in (51), by taking into account (A.2) and (A.3) for asymptotic behavior at infinity, we can describe solutions of (58) for \( \sqrt{\eta}\in \left[\sqrt{\eta_0},\infty \right) \) as
for s =+, −. For \( \sqrt{\eta}\in \left(-\infty, -\sqrt{\eta_0}\right] \), solutions to (58) can be easily obtained by using (60) through the relations of (9); they are not shown here explicitly.
Characteristic Equations for Determining the Unified Separation Quantity of the Zeroth-Order for the Parabolic Metal Groove
By substituting \( {H}_1^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) in (55) and \( {H}_2^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) in (60) into the boundary condition for s = +, ε 1 = ε d , and ε 2 = ε m in (35), we obtain
where we use notations of \( {w}_1\hbox{'}\left(a,z\right)={\partial}_z{w}_1\left(a,z\right) \) and U '(a, z) = ∂ z U(a, z). Equation (61) is the characteristic equation for determining the zeroth-order unified separation quantity for the even (+) symmetry, ζ + (0) u (ξ), in the parabolic metal groove. Similarly, by substituting \( {H}_1^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) in (56) and \( {H}_2^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) in (60) into the boundary condition for s = −, ε 1 = ε d , and ε 2 = ε m in (35), we obtain
where we use notation of w '2 (a, z) = ∂w 2(a, z)/∂z. Equation (62) is the characteristic equation for determining the zeroth-order unified separation quantity for the odd (−) symmetry, ζ − (0) u (ξ), in the parabolic metal groove.
Approximate Determination of the Zeroth-Order Unified Separation Quantity Based on a Figure-Merit Function for the Parabolic Metal Groove
Apparently, it is very difficult to analytically solve (61) and (62) for ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ), respectively. In this case, we choose to solve them numerically. In numerical calculations, we use the dielectric permittivity ε d = 1 and the metallic permittivity ε m = −20 by assuming that the dielectric matter is air with a permittivity of ε d = 1 and the metallic matter is gold with a permittivity of ε m = − 20.6 + 1.57i at a wavelength of 750 nm [45]; the imaginary part of ε m is significantly smaller than the real part and thus can be ignored for the sake of simplicity. For the numerical calculations, we used a set of Fortran subroutines provided by Gil et al. [46] for computing U(a, x) to numerically solve characteristic Eqs. (61) and (62) in Mathematica (Wolfram Research, Inc.). Without this set, we were not able to obtain the whole profiles of Figs. 3 and 4 from (61) and (62) by employing the usual methods of defining U(a, x) as in Mathematica. The elementary outline of how to call a Fortran subroutine from Mathematica can be found in [47].
Numerical calculations of the even (+) and odd (−) zeroth-order unified separation quantities at ξ = 0, ζ + (0) u (0), and ζ − (0) u (0), as a function of the parameter η 0 for the parabolic surface \( \pm \sqrt{\eta }=\sqrt{\eta_0} \) when ξ = 0, ε d = 1, and ε m = − 20 are used in (61) and (62), respectively. The specific value of ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 is obtained as η 0 = 0.204785 numerically
Numerical calculations of the even (+) and odd (−) zeroth-order unified separation quantities, ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ), as functions of ξ for various values of η 0(=ρ 0/λ 0) when ε d = 1 and ε m = − 20 are used in (61) and (62), respectively. a Shows ζ + (0) u (ξ) − ζ + (0) u (0) with red and black solid lines for 0.001 ≤ η 0 ≤ 0.1 and 0.2 ≤ η 0 ≤ 1.0, respectively, while b shows ζ − (0) u (ξ) − ζ − (0) u (0) with a black solid line. The broken lines are fitting curves based on (63)
Figure 3 shows ζ + (0) u (0) and ζ − (0) u (0) as functions of η 0, which are obtained by numerically solving (61) and (62), respectively, under the conditions ξ = 0, ε d = 1, and ε m = − 20. From the two profiles in Fig. 3, we certainly infer that ζ + (0) u (0) and ζ − (0) u (0) approach positive and negative infinites, respectively, for η 0 → 0 +; they become more equal in value with increasing η 0 and they approach the same value for η 0 → ∞. Note that ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 is satisfied at η 0 = 0.204785 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅, though ζ + (0) u (0) = 0 is not satisfied for any values of η 0.
In parts (a) and (b) of Fig. 4, the solid lines show ζ + (0) u (ξ) − ζ + (0) u (0) and ζ − (0) u (ξ) − ζ − (0) u (0), respectively, as a function of ξ for specific values of η 0; they are obtained by numerically solving (61) and (62), respectively, under the conditions ε d = 1 and ε m = − 20. The broken lines in Fig. 4 are fitting curves for the respective solid lines, though they are unclear due to their overlapping with the solid lines. In Fig. 4a, the red and black lines are used for 0.001 ≤ η 0 ≤ 0.1 and 0.2 ≤ η 0 ≤ 1.0, respectively, because the behavior of profiles is clearly expressed. For the curve fitting, taking into account the approximate behavior of ζ s(0) u (ξ), s =+, − for large values of ξ (described in Appendix B), we select a figure-of-merit function with four parameters, p 0, p 1, p 2, and p 3, expressed as follows:
which implies
In Tables 1 and 2, we show several values of p 0, p 1, p 2, and p 3 for specific values of η 0 obtained by fitting (63) to the solid curves in Fig. 4a, b, respectively (to maintain clarity in the diagram, some of the curves are not shown).
Unified Radial Functions of the Zeroth-Order for the Parabolic Metal Groove
In the parabolic metal groove, the zeroth-order unified separation quantities ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ) determined by (61) and (62), respectively, are quite accurately estimated by the figure-of-merit function in (63). Even with it, we cannot solve the zeroth-order unified radial Eq. (47) as an already-known differential equation. In this subsection, we demonstrate that (47) roughly approximates the modified parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.7) through transformations.
By defining the modified wave numbers of SPPs in the planar geometry, k s mp (ξ) for s =+, −, as
we can express the zeroth-order unified radial Eq. (47) as
which can be transformed into the modified parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.7) if k mp (ξ) is constant. We solve (66) under the rough approximation
in which (66) approximate
where
from (65). The rough approximation in (67) can be numerically estimated by the following ratio:
which can be obtained from (63), (64), (65), and (69). By using the values of p 0, p 1, p 2, and p 3 in Tables 1 and 2 to numerically estimate (70), we can make graphs of the ratio k + mp (ξ)/k + mp (0) and k − mp (ξ)/k − mp (0), respectively; they are shown in parts (a) and (b) of Fig. 5, respectively. It is shown in both parts (a) and (b) of Fig. 5 that (67) is better satisfied with an increasing value of η 0 and with a decreasing value of ξ to zero. Numerically, (67) is reasonably satisfied at ξ = 5 for η 0 = 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, and 0.05 in Fig. 5a and for η 0 = 1.0, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1 in Fig. 5b; (67) is barely satisfied at ξ = 5 for η 0 = 0.01 in Fig. 5a and for η 0 = 0.05 in Fig. 5b; (67) is scarcely satisfied at ξ = 5 for η 0 = 0.005 and 0.001 in Fig. 5a.
The approximate differential Eq. (68) of the zeroth-order unified radial equation is a special case of the modified parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.7) corresponding to the parameter values
Because of (A.17), outgoing and incoming solutions for (A.7) are given by E(a, z) and E*(a, z), respectively; by taking (48) and (50) into account, we can choose
where
are obtained by using (A.9), (A.10), (A.16), and (A.17). For the limit of ξ → ∞, from the asymptotic formulae (A.17) and (A.18), it is inferred that
where
By using (49) for (72), we obtain
which indicates neither outgoing nor incoming waves but a standing wave with the free end. The qualitative behavior of (77) as a function of ξ can be understood from properties of W(a, z) and W(a, − z) as two linearly independent solutions to the differential Eq. (A.7). As described in 3.3 [38], when a is negative, (A.7) has oscillatory-type solutions throughout; when a is positive, (A.7) has exponential-type solutions for \( -2\sqrt{a}<z<2\sqrt{a} \) and oscillatory-type solutions for \( -\infty <z<-2\sqrt{a} \) and \( 2\sqrt{a}<z<+\infty \). Because it follows from (71) that a = − ζ s(0) u (0)/2λ 0 k s mp (0) is given for W(a, z) and W(a, − z) in (77), the qualitative behavior of Ξ s(0) u (ξ) in (77) can be determined by the positive and negative values of ζ s(0) u (0): Ξ s(0) u (ξ) is oscillatory as a function of ξ ∈ [0, ∞) for ζ s(0) u (0) > 0, while Ξ s(0) u (ξ) changes from exponential to oscillatory behaviors with an increasing value of ξ ∈ [0, ∞) for ζ s(0) u (0) < 0. For ζ + (0) u (0) in Fig. 3, because of ζ + (0) u (0) > 0 for all the values of η 0, Ξ + (0) u (ξ) is oscillatory as a function of ξ ∈ [0, ∞) for any values of the radius of curvature, ρ 0. For ζ − (0) u (0) in Fig. 3, Ξ − (0) u (ξ) is oscillatory when ζ − (0) u (0) > 0 (i.e., η 0 > 0.204 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅), while Ξ − (0) u (ξ) changes from exponential to oscillatory behaviors with an increasing value of ξ ∈ [0, ∞) when ζ − (0) u (0) < 0 (i.e., 0 < η 0 < 0.204 ⋅ ⋅ ⋅).
Non-Existence of Zeroth-Order Solutions for the Parabolic Metal Wedge
In this section, we clearly prove that no plasmonic modes exist for the parabolic metal wedge by examining (43).
For the parabolic metal wedge, we can write ε 1 = ε m < 0 and ε 2 = ε d > 0. Substituting ε 2 = ε d into (43) for j = 2, we have
which is the same as (52) by replacing \( {H}_2^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) with \( {H}_1^{s(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \) in (78) and therefore can be solved in the same manner as that employed in (52). Dividing (78) by 4πε 1/2 d and rearranging terms, we obtain the same Eq. as (53), a special case of the modified parabolic cylinder Eq. (A.7) corresponding to the parameter values given by (54). Since two standard linearly independent solutions to (A.7) are given by W(a, z) and W(a, − z) written in (A.8), we observe that two linearly independent solutions to (78) are expressed by
By using (A.19), we find that the asymptotic behaviors of the two solutions in (79) are oscillatory as a function of η, with the amplitude varying as η − 1/4 for the limit of \( \sqrt{\eta}\to \pm \infty \); this behavior is similar to those exhibited by the outgoing and incoming solutions of the unified radial equation for ξ → ∞ in (75), respectively. This clearly indicates that the two linearly independent solutions in (79) are unsuitable for the composition of the zeroth-order extended angular function in the interval \( \pm \sqrt{\eta}\in \left[\sqrt{\eta_0},\infty \right) \) because their behavior does not belong to localization but to propagation. Therefore, we can arrive at the very interesting conclusion that plasmonic modes do not exist for the parabolic metal wedge.
Electric Field-Line Representation
It is very important to understand plasmonic modes not only mathematically but also visually. In the present case where the electromagnetic field has only a z-component of the magnetic field in the parabolic cylinder coordinate system, we can use a field-line pattern of the electric field, which is graphically simpler and more intuitive than the field-vector pattern representation.
We describe the field-line pattern representation of an electric field in detail. The tangent at an arbitrary point on an electric field line indicates the direction of electric field vector \( E\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t\right) \) at this point. This can be described mathematically by using a line vector element d s as \( E\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t\right)\times ds=\mathbf{0} \), which can be simplified into the form
when \( E\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t\right)={E}_{\xi}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t\right){e}_{\xi }+{E}_{\eta}\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t\right){e}_{\eta } \) and ds = h ξ dξe ξ + h η dηe η , where e ξ and e η are the unit vectors along the ξ- and η-axes, respectively; h ξ and h η denote the metric coefficients of the parabolic cylindrical coordinates in (1) given by \( {h}_{\xi }={2}^{-1}{\lambda}_0\sqrt{\left(\xi +\eta \right)/\xi } \) and \( {h}_{\eta }={2}^{-1}{\lambda}_0\sqrt{\left(\xi +\eta \right)/\eta } \). By using (31)–(33) for (80), we obtain a differential equation expressed in terms of the total derivatives with respect to ξ and η as follows:
which becomes the exact differential equation dψ(ξ, η) = 0 with the solution ψ(ξ, η) = constant, if we set \( \psi \left(\xi, \eta \right)={H}_z\left(\xi, \sqrt{\eta },t-\pi /2\omega \right) \). Then, for the time-varying scalar field, f(ξ, η, t), of the electric field-line representation, we can set
The field-line pattern at time t = t 0 is described by the scalar field with the contour f(ξ, η, t 0) = C, where C indicates the contour level. The contour interval can be controlled by the interval value of the contour level. The evolution of field-line patterns can be investigated for different moments: t = t 0 + nτ with n = 1, 2, 3, ⋅ ⋅ ⋅, where τ denotes a suitable chosen duration between two neighboring snapshots.
For actual calculations, using (4), (7), and (25), we rewrite (82) in a form that contains the unified radial function and the extended angular function with even (+) and odd (−) symmetries. The scalar field of the zeroth-order approximation for (82) is given by
Figures 6 and 7 show the electric field-line patterns of the zeroth-order approximated plasmonic modes of (a) even and (b) odd symmetries in the parabolic metal groove for the surfaces η 0 = 0.3 and η 0 = 0.1, respectively, where the surface η 0 is characterized in (2). The electric field-line patterns were obtained by using (83) with t = π/2ω. In the calculations, for the even symmetry, we employed \( {H}_1^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), \( {H}_2^{+(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), and Ξ + (0) u (ξ) in (55), (60), and (77), respectively; for the odd symmetry, we used \( {H}_1^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), \( {H}_2^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },\xi \right) \), and Ξ − (0) u (ξ) in (56), (60), and (77), respectively. The parameters ε d = 1, ε m = − 20, and H ′0 = 1 were used. Some specific values for ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ) are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The geometric dimensions in Figs. 6 and 7 are normalized by the wavelength in vacuum, λ 0, on the horizontal and vertical axes. The blue and red lines in Figs. 6 and 7 indicate clockwise and counterclockwise loops, respectively, for the line of electric force. The field patterns in Figs. 6 and 7 evolve with the behavior of the standing waves. By comparing Figs. 6 and 7, we can consider a strong contrast between even and odd symmetries for the electric field-line patterns in parabolic metal grooves. For parts (b) of Figs. 6 and 7, the apparent distinction can be found in the behavior of the electric field-line patterns around the origin of figures: the electric field-lines are more densely distributed around the origin of figures for Fig. 7b than around that for Fig. 6b. This distinction is not observed for parts (a) of Figs. 6 and 7. The clear contrast of even and odd symmetries for the electric field-line patterns can be understood from the viewpoint of the positive and negative values of ζ s(0) u (0) for s =+, −, by observing that ζ − (0) u (0) = 6.71 > 0 and ζ − (0) u (0) = − 15.71 < 0 are obtained for parts (b) of Figs. 6 and 7, respectively, while ζ + (0) u (0) = 10.16 > 0 and ζ + (0) u (0) = 5.40 > 0 are for parts (a) of Figs. 6 and 7, respectively (these data given in Tables 1 and 2). We can observe that the dense distribution of electric field lines around the origin of figures is caused by the negative value of ζ s(0) u (0), because, from (77) with (73), Ξ s(0) u (0) largely depends on ζ s(0) u (0):
Electric field lines of the zeroth-order plasmonic mode of the a even and b odd symmetries in the parabolic metal groove for the surface η 0(=ρ 0/λ 0) = 0.3, obtained using (83) at t = π/2ω under the conditions ε d = 1 and ε m = − 20. The blue and red lines indicate the clockwise and counterclockwise loops, respectively, of the line of electric force. The geometric dimensions of the horizontal and vertical axes are normalized by the wavelength in vacuum λ 0
Electric field lines of the zeroth-order plasmonic mode of the a even and b odd symmetries in the parabolic metal groove for the surface η 0(=ρ 0/λ 0) = 0.1, obtained using (83) at t = π/2ω under the conditions ε d = 1 and ε m = − 20. The blue and red lines indicate the clockwise and counterclockwise loops, respectively, of the line of electric force. The geometric dimensions of the horizontal and vertical axes are normalized by the wavelength in vacuum λ 0
where γ s = λ 0 k s mp (0); (84) can be transformed for ζ s(0) u (0) ≪ 0 into the form
which shows that Ξ s(0) u (0) exponentially increases with a decreasing value of ζ s(0) u (0) < 0 because Ξ s(0) u (0) is approximately described as an exponential function of − ζ s(0) u (0) for ζ s(0) u (0) ≪ 0. This qualitatively explains the numerical results: Ξ − (0) u (0) = 2.562, Ξ − (0) u (0) = 9.587, Ξ + (0) u (0) = 2.282, Ξ + (0) u (0) = 2.691 for ζ − (0) u (0) = 6.71 > 0, ζ − (0) u (0) = − 15.71 < 0, ζ + (0) u (0) = 10.16 > 0, and ζ + (0) u (0) = 5.40 > 0, respectively; they were calculated by using (84) with (73), (A.10) and H ′0 = 1. It is important to point out that the dense distribution of electric field lines around the origin of figures takes place only for the odd symmetry because the negative value of ζ s(0) u (0) is limited to the odd symmetry (s = −) from the numerical results of ζ s(0) u (0) for s =+, − in Fig. 3.
Figure 8 shows the electric field-line patterns of the zeroth-order approximated plasmonic modes of odd symmetry in the parabolic metal groove for the surface η 0 = 0.204785; this is the specific value of η 0 for ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 given in Table 2. The other calculation conditions for drawing Fig. 8 are identical to those in Figs. 6 and 7. By substituting ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 into (77), we simplify the unified radial function of the zeroth order into the form
Electric field lines of the zeroth-order plasmonic mode of the odd symmetry in the parabolic metal groove for the surface η 0(=ρ 0/λ 0) = 0.204785, the specific value of η 0 for ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 in (62) when ε d = 1 and ε m = − 20. The other calculation conditions are the same as those in part b of Figs. 6 and 7. The blue and red lines indicate the clockwise and counterclockwise loops, respectively, of the line of electric force. The geometric dimensions of the horizontal and vertical axes are normalized by the wavelength in vacuum λ 0
where the J-function is the Bessel function of the first kind; we use the formula (A.11) for \( W\left(0,\pm \sqrt{2{\gamma}^{-}\xi}\right) \) and we use the specific relation, \( \tan \varphi =\sqrt{2}-1 \), obtained by substituting ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 into (73). In the case of ξ → 0, (86) becomes
where we use the asymptotic behavior of the Bessel function of the first kind, J ν (z) ∼ (z/2)ν/Γ(1 + ν) as z → 0 [36], and we use the relation \( {H}_0^{\hbox{'}}={H}_0\sqrt{\varGamma \left(3/4\right)/\varGamma \left(1/4\right)} \), obtained by substituting ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 into (74) for s = −. By substituting ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 into (56) for ξ = 0, and by using (A.13), we obtain the angular function in the dielectric region as follows:
(double-sign corresponds). By substituting ζ − (0) u (0) = 0 into (60) for s = − and ξ = 0, by using (A.4), and by taking into account the odd symmetric relation in (9), we obtain the angular function in the metallic region as follows:
(double-sign corresponds), where the K-function is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. Because Eqs. (86) to (89) are described by relatively simple functions such as Bessel functions, we can carefully study the electric field-line pattern of Fig. 8, calculated by using (83) with t = π/2ω for s = −, as compared to those of parts (b) of Figs. 6 and 7. For ξ → 0 and t = π/2ω, the zeroth-order scalar field in (83) for s = − is described as
where \( {H}_1^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },0\right) \) and \( {H}_2^{-(0)}\left(\sqrt{\eta },0\right) \) are given in (88) and (89), respectively. Equation (90) shows the limiting behavior of the electric field-line pattern along the horizontal line passing through the apex of the parabolic cylinder in Fig. 8. Because the electric field-line pattern of Fig. 8 corresponds to the case ζ − (0) u (0) = 0, it is used as a fixed standard to thoroughly understand the electric field-line pattern of parts (b) in Figs. 6 and 7 with ζ − (0) u (0) > 0 and ζ − (0) u (0) < 0, respectively.
Conclusions
We studied plasmonic modes for a parabolic cylinder geometry by solving the wave equation for the magnetic field in parabolic cylindrical coordinates through the QSOV in combination with perturbation methods. By analytically solving the zeroth-order perturbation equations for unified radial and extended angular functions, we found that plasmonic modes are absent for the parabolic metal wedge but present in separating even and odd symmetries for the parabolic metal groove in the form of standing waves and not as superfocusing waves. For the parabolic metal groove, we showed that the unified radial function of the zeroth order is described by using the W-function of parabolic cylinder functions for the even and odd symmetries. We also showed that the extended angular functions of the zeroth order are described by using the U-function of parabolic cylinder functions in the metallic region for both the even and odd symmetries, and by using the w 1- and w 2-functions of those in the dielectric region for the even and odd symmetries, respectively. The unified radial and extended angular functions of the first and higher order were not shown explicitly because they could not be estimated numerically due to some difficulties involved in numerical calculations. By using the zeroth-order perturbed solutions, we obtained the electric field-line patterns of the zeroth-order approximated plasmonic modes in the parabolic metal groove for relatively small and large radii of curvature at the apex of the parabolic cylinder. The electric field-line patterns in the odd symmetry showed that the electric field around the apex of the parabolic cylinder is stronger for a small curvature radius than for a large one, while those in the even symmetry showed no such an apparent distinction; these results were analytically studied from the mathematical viewpoint of the positive and negative values of the zeroth-order unified separation quantity. We firmly believe that the QSOV method employed to solve the wave equation is the optimal method with which to theoretically understand plasmonic modes in various tapered geometries.
References
Neacsu CC, Berweger S, Olmon RL, Saraf LV, Ropers C, Raschke MB (2010) Near-field localization in plasmonic superfocusing: a nanoemitter on a tip. Nano Lett 10:592–596
Sadiq D, Shirdel J, Lee JS, Selishcheva E, Park N, Lienau C (2011) Adiabatic nanofocusing scattering-type optical nanoscopy of individual gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett 11:1609–1613
Kim SH, Lee ES, Ji YB, Jeon TI (2010) Improvement of THz coupling using a tapered parallel-plate waveguide. Opt Express 18:1289–1295
Zhan H, Mendis R, Mittleman DM (2010) Superfocusing terahertz waves below λ/250 using plasmonic parallel-plate waveguides. Opt Express 18:9643–9650
Iwaszczuk K, Andryieuski A, Lavrinenko A, Zhang XC, Jepsen PU (2012) Terahertz field enhancement to the MV/cm regime in a tapered parallel plate waveguide. Opt Express 20:8344–8355
Bozhevolnyi SI (ed) (2009) Plasmonic Nanoguides and Circuits. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore
Gramotnev DK, Bozhevolnyi SI (2010) Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat Photonics 4:83–91
Gramotnev DK, Bozhevolnyi SI (2014) Nanofocusing of electromagnetic radiation. Nat Photonics 8:13–22
Takahara J, Yamagishi S, Taki H, Morimoto A, Kobayashi T (1997) Guiding of a one dimensional optical beam with nanometer diameter. Opt Lett 22:475–477
Nerkarayan KV (1997) Superfocusing of a surface polariton in a wedge-like structure. Phys Lett 237:103–105
Maier SA (2007) Plasmonics: Fundamental and Applications. Springer, New York
Sarid A, Challener W (2010) Modern Introduction to Surface Plasmons. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kurihara K, Otomo A, Syouji A, Takahara J, Suzuki K, Yokoyama S (2007) Superfocusing modes of surface plasmon polaritons in conical geometry based on the quasi-separation of variables approach. J Phys A 40:12479–12503
Kurihara K, Yamamoto K, Takahara J, Otomo A (2008) Superfocusing modes of surface plasmon polaritons in a wedge-shaped geometry obtained by quasi-separation of variables. J Phys A 41:295401
Kurihara K, Takahara J, Yamamoto K, Otomo A (2009) Identifying plasmonic modes in a circular paraboloidal geometry by quasi-separation of variables. J Phys A 42:185401
Stockman MI (2004) Nanofocusing of optical energy in tapered plasmonic waveguides. Phys Rev Lett 93:137404
Gramotnev DK (2005) Adiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons by sharp metallic grooves: Geometrical optics approach. J Appl Phys 98:104302
Janunts NA, Baghdasaryan KS, Nerkararyan KV, Hecht B (2005) Excitation and superfocusing of surface plasmon polaritons on a silver-coated optical fiber tip. Opt Commun 253:118–124
Ruppin R (2005) Effect of non-locality on nanofocusing of surface plasmon field intensity in a conical tip. Phys Lett A 340:299–302
Vogel MW, Gramotnev DK (2007) Adiabatic nano-focusing of plasmons by metallic tapered rods in the presence of dissipation. Phys Lett A 363:507–511
Gramotnev DK, Vernon KC (2007) Adiabatic nano-focusing of plasmons by sharp metallic wedges. Appl Phys B 86:7–17
Gramotnev DK, Pile DFP, Vogel MW, Zhang X (2007) Local electric field enhancement during nanofocusing of plasmons by a tapered gap. Phys Rev B 75:035431
Babayan AE, Nerkararyan KV (2007) The strong localization of surface plasmon polariton on a metal-coated tip of optical fiber. Ultramicroscopy 107:1136–1140
Vernon KC, Gramotnev DK, Pile DFP (2007) Adiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons by a sharp metal wedge on a dielectric substrate. J Appl Phys 101:104312
Ding W, Andrews SR, Maier SA (2007) Internal excitation and superfocusing of surface plasmon polaritons on a silver-coated optical fiber tip. Phys Rev A 75:063822
Vogel MW, Gramotnev DK (2010) Shape effects in tapered metal rods during adiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons. J Appl Phys 107:044303
Bozhevolnyi SI, Nerkararyan KV (2010) Adiabatic nanofocusing of channel plasmon polaritons. Opt Lett 35:541–543
Babadjanyan AJ, Margaryan NL, Nerkararyan KV (2000) Superfocusing of surface polaritons in the conical structures. J Appl Phys 87:3785–3788
Janunts NA, Bagdasaryan KS, Nerkararyan KV (2000) Superfocusing of surface polaritons in the system of two touching metallic semicylinders. Phys Lett A 269:257–260
Lalayan AA, Bagdasaryan KS, Petrosyan PG, Nerkararyan KV (2002) Anomalous field enhancement from the superfocusing of surface plasmons at contacting silver surfaces. J Appl Phys 91:2965–2968
Nerkararyan KV, Hakhoumian AA, Babayan AE (2008) Terahertz surface plasmon-polariton superfocusing in coaxial cone semiconductor structures. Plasmonics 3:27–31
Hagmann MJ, Kumar G, Pandey S, Nahata A (2011) Analysis and simulation of generating terahertz surface waves on a tapered field emission tip. J Vac Sci Technol B 29:02B113
Wang LC, Deng L, Cui N, Niu YP, Gong SQ (2010) Extraordinary optical transmission through metal gratings with single and double grooved surfaces. Chin Phys B 19:017303
Mote RG, Zhou W, Fu Y (2010) Beaming of light through depth-tuned plasmonic nanostructures. Optik 121:1962–1965
Liu W, Neshev DN, Miroshnichenko AE, Shadrivov IV, Kivshar YS (2011) Polychromatic nanofocusing of surface plasmon polaritons. Phys Rev B 83:073404
Lebedev NN (1972) Special Functions and their Applications. Dover, New York
Buchholz H (1969) The confluent hypergeometric function with special emphasis on its applications. Springer, Berlin
Miller JCP (1955) Tables of Weber Parabolic Cylinder Functions. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London
Polyanin AD, Manzhirov AV (2007) Handbook of Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton
Sommerfeld A (1949) Partial Differential Equation in Physics. Academic, New York
Samble JR, Bradbery GW, Yang F (1991) Optical excitation of surface plasmons: an introduction. Contemp Phys 32:173–183
Kurihara K, Nakamura K, Suzuki K (2002) Asymmetric SPR sensor response curve-fitting equation for the accurate determination of SPR resonance angle. Sensor Actuator B-Chem 86:49–57
Farlow SJ (1993) Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers. Dover, New York
Jackson JD (1998) Classical Electrodynamic. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Innes RA, Sambles JR (1987) Optical characterization of gold using surface plasmon-polaritons. J Phys F 17:277–287
Gil A, Segura J, Temme NM (2007) Numerical Methods for Special Functions. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Bahder TB (1995) Mathematica® for Scientists and Engineers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover, New York
Temme NM (2000) Numerical and asymptotic aspects of parabolic cylinder functions. J Comput Appl Math 121:221–246
Gil A, Segura J, Temme NM (2004) Integral representations for computing real parabolic cylinder functions. Numer Math 98:105–134
Gil A, Segura J, Temme NM (2006) Computing the real parabolic cylinder functions U(a, x), V(a, x). ACM Trans Math Softw 32:70–101
Miller JCP (1952) On the choice of standard solutions to Weber’s equation. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 48:428–435
Acknowledgments
One of the authors (K. Kurihara) is most thankful to Dr. F. Peper of NICT for his useful discussions and comments on calling a Fortran subroutine from Mathematica. This work was supported by KAKENHI (21560073).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A. Some Properties of Parabolic Cylinder Functions
Parabolic cylinder functions (PCFs) U(a, z), V(a, z), and W(a, z) are associated with the parabolic cylinder in harmonic analysis; therefore, their descriptions can be found everywhere [38, 46, 48–51]. In particular, chapter 19 of Abramowitz and Stegun [48] gives a basic overview of properties of PCFs.
The two standard linearly independent solutions of the differential equation
are denoted by U(a, z) and y(a, z). These solutions can be described by using the simplest even and odd functions denoted by y 1(a, z) and y 2(a, z), respectively (see the reference [49]). Note that the pair y 1(a, z) and y 2(a, z) are not numerically satisfactory [52], because they have almost the same asymptotic behavior at infinity. The behavior of U(a, z) and V(a, z) is for large positive values of z [50]:
At a = 0, from (19.15.9) and (19.15.13) with (19.15.2) in [48], we have
respectively, where the I- and K-functions represent the modified Bessel functions of the first and second kinds, respectively. The behavior of U(a, z) is, for large positive values of a (a > > z 2) [38, 48]:
The differential equation
is a modified form of (A.1) obtained by replacing a by − ia and z by ze (1/4)iπ. We see from [50] that y 1(−ia, ze (1/4)iπ) and e − (1/4)iπ y 2(−ia, ze (1/4)iπ), usually rewritten as w 1(a, z) and w 2(a, z), respectively, are even and odd solutions, respectively, to (A.7); the series involves complex quantities in which the imaginary part of the sum vanished identically [38]. The two standard linearly independent solutions of (A.7) are denoted by W(a, z) and W(a, − z); they are given by the representation [38]
(double-sign corresponds) where
At z = 0, we have [38]
(double-sign corresponds) where the J-function is the Bessel function of the first kind. By comparing (A.11) with (A.8) for a = 0, we obtain
(double-sign corresponds) where we use the relation \( \varGamma \left(1/4\right)\varGamma \left(3/4\right)=\sqrt{2}\pi \), obtained by substituting z = 1/4 into the reflection formula for the gamma function [36]: Γ(z)Γ(1 − z) = π/sin πz. The complex solutions of (A.7) are defined as [38, 48]
where
The behaviors of E(a, z) and E*(a, z) are, for large positive values of z [38, 48]:
where
Therefore, E(a, z) and E*(a, z) behave as outgoing and incoming waves, respectively, for large z. From (A.14), (A.15), and (A.17), the behaviors of W(a, z) and W(a, − z) are, for large positive values of z [38, 46]:
From (291)–(292) in [38] or 19.22.1–19.22.2 in [48], we see that the behaviors of W(a, z) and W(a, − z) are, for large positive values of a (a > > z 2):
(double-sign corresponds). By using (A.8) with (A.20) we find for large positive values of a (a > > z 2) that
Appendix B. Approximate Behaviors of ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ) in (61) and (62), Respectively, for the Limit of ξ → ∞
Although it is very difficult to analytically solve the characteristic Eqs. (61) and (62) for ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ), respectively, their approximate behaviors for the limit of ξ → ∞ can be analytically obtained; they are helpful for preparing figure-of-merit functions used as simple functions fitted to numerically calculated data of ζ + (0) u (ξ) and ζ − (0) u (ξ). From (A.6), we find that \( {U}^{\hbox{'}}\left(a,z\right)/U\left(a,z\right)\sim -\sqrt{a} \) for a → ∞, where U '(a, z) = ∂ z U(a, z). From (A.21), it is inferred that \( {w}_1^{\hbox{'}}\left(a,z\right)/{w}_1\left(a,z\right)\sim \sqrt{a} \) for a → ∞ and z ≠ 0, where w '1 (a, z) = ∂ z w 1(a, z). In a very similar way, from (A.21), it is inferred that \( {w}_2^{\hbox{'}}\left(a,z\right)/{w}_2\left(a,z\right)\sim \sqrt{a} \) for a → ∞ and z ≠ 0, where w '2 (a, z) = ∂ z w 2(a, z). Therefore, we see that the characteristic Eqs. (61) and (62) for ξ → ∞ are written in the form
(double-sign corresponds), which can be transformed into
Equation (B.2) indicates that ζ ± (0) u (ξ) behaves as a straight line with a slope of 4π 2(ε 1/2 d + |ε m |1/2)− 1(ε − 3/2 d − |ε m |− 3/2)− 1 for ξ → ∞.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kurihara, K., Otomo, A., Yamamoto, K. et al. Identification of Plasmonic Modes in Parabolic Cylinder Geometry by Quasi-Separation of Variables. Plasmonics 10, 165–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-014-9791-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-014-9791-3