Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguish models mimicking the SM Higgs

  • Review article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new particle around 125 GeV observed at the LHC is almost consistent with the standard model Higgs boson, except that the diphoton decay mode may be excessive. We summarize a number of possibilities. We propose to use the vector-boson fusion to test the underlying model for electroweak symmetry breaking. Using the well known dijet-tagging technique to single out the vector-boson fusion mechanism, we investigate potential of vector-boson fusion to discriminate a number of models suggested to give an enhanced inclusive diphoton production rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. G. Aad, et al. [The ATLAS Collaboration], arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex], 2012

  2. S. Chatrchyan, et al. [The CMS Collaboration], arXiv: 1207.7235 [hep-ex], 2012

  3. P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1964, 13(16): 508

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1964, 13(9): 321

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1964, 13(20): 585

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Farhi and L. Susskind, Phys. Rep., 1981, 74(3): 277

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, Phys. Rep., 1985, 117(2–4): 75

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Rev. D, 1999, 59(8): 086004, arXiv: hep-ph/9807344

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Appelquist, H. C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu, Phys. Rev. D, 2001, 64(3): 035002, arXiv: hep-ph/0012100

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 83(17): 3370, arXiv: hep-ph/9905221

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz and A. E. Nelson, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 0207: 034, arXiv: hep-ph/0206021

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Bernabei, et al. [DAMA and LIBRA Collaborations], Eur. Phys. J. C, 2010, 67: 39, arXiv: 1002.1028 [astro-ph.GA]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. E. Aalseth, et al. [CoGeNT Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106: 131301, arXiv: 1002.4703 [astro-ph.CO]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Ahmed, et al. [CDMS-II Collaboration], Science, 2010, 327: 1619, arXiv: 0912.3592 [astro-ph.CO]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Aprile, et al. [XENON100 Collaboration], arXiv: 1207.5988 [astro-ph.CO], 2012

  16. T. Aaltonen, et al. [CDF Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 101: 202001, arXiv: 0806.2472 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Aaltonen, et al. [CDF Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 83: 112003, arXiv: 1101.0034 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. V. M. Abazov, et al. [D0 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D, 2011, 84: 112005, arXiv: 1107.4995 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. See: e.g., K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung and T.-C. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 682: 287, arXiv: 0908.2589 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Chatrchyan, et al. [CMS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B, 2012, 709: 28, arXiv: 1112.5100 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Aaltonen, et al. [CDF Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106: 171801, arXiv: 1104.0699 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. See: e.g., K. Cheung and J. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106: 211803, arXiv: 1104.1375 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. V. M. Abazov, et al. [D0 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 107: 011804, arXiv: 1106.1921 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Chatrchyan, et al. [CMS Collaboration], arXiv: 1208.3477 [hep-ex], 2012

  25. J. Bagger, V. D. Barger, K. Cheung, J. F. Gunion, T. Han, G. A. Ladinsky, R. Rosenfeld, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D, 1995, 52(7): 3878, arXiv: hep-ph/9504426

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. L. Rainwater and D. Zeppenfeld, J. High Energy Phys., 1997, 9712: 005, arXiv: hep-ph/9712271

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Chang, K. Cheung, P. Y. Tseng, and T. C. Yuan, arXiv: 1206.5853 [hep-ph], 2012

  28. P. M. Ferreira, R. Santos, M. Sher and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 077703, arXiv: 1112.3277 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Carena, S. Gori, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys., 2012, 1203: 014, arXiv: 1112.3336 [hepph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Hagiwara, J. S. Lee, and J. Nakamura, arXiv: 1207.0802 [hep-ph], 2012

  31. See: e.g., J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J. M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang, and J.-Y. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys., 2012, 1203: 086, arXiv: 1202.5821 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, arXiv: 1203.5048 [hep-ph], 2012

  33. C.-F. Chang, K. Cheung, Y.-C. Lin, and T.-C. Yuan, J. High Energy Phys., 2012, 1206: 128, arXiv: 1202.0054 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. E. Gabrielli, B. Mele, and M. Raidal, arXiv: 1202.1796 [hepph], 2012

  35. W. Goldberger and M. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 83(24): 4922

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. W. Goldberger and M. Wise, Phys. Lett. B, 2000, 475(3-4): 275

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. K. Cheung, Phys. Rev. D, 2001, 63(5): 056007, arXiv: hepph/0009232

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. K. Cheung and T.-C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 141602, arXiv: 1112.4146 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. V. Barger, M. Ishida, and W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 108: 101802, arXiv: 1111.4473 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, and N. Gaur, Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85: 095021, arXiv: 1201.2644 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. M. S. Chanowitz, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 1988, 38(1): 323

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. MADGRAPH: J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys., 2011, 1106: 128, arXiv: 1106.0522 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. The MG/ME Pythia-PGS package, http://madgraph.hep.uiuc.edu/index.html, J. Alwall and the CP3 development team

  44. CMS Collaboration, Search for the fermiophobic model Higgs boson decaying into two photons, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-002, March 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kingman Cheung.

Additional information

Plenary talk given at the 20th International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY 2012), Peking University, Beijing, China, August 13–18, 2012

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, J., Cheung, K., Tseng, PY. et al. Distinguish models mimicking the SM Higgs. Front. Phys. 8, 285–293 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0298-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-013-0298-8

Keywords

Navigation