Skip to main content
Log in

Fast scaling approach based on cavitation conditions to estimate the speed limitation for axial piston pump design

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The power density of axial piston pumps can benefit greatly from increased rotational speeds. However, the maximum rotational speed of axial piston machines is limited by the cavitation phenomenon for a given volumetric displacement. This paper presents a scaling law derived from an analytical cavitation model to estimate the speed limitations for the same series of axial piston pumps. The cavitation model is experimentally verified using a high-speed axial piston pump, and the scaling law is validated with open specification data in product brochures. Results show that the speed limitation is approximately proportional to the square root of the inlet pressure and inversely proportional to the cube root of volumetric displacement. Furthermore, a characteristic constant Cp is defined based on the presented scaling law. This constant can represent the comprehensive capacity of axial piston pumps free from cavitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanaka Y, Sakama S, Nakano K, et al. Comparative study on dynamic characteristics of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric motors. In: Proceedings of ASME/BATH 2013 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. Sarasota: ASME, 2013, V001T01A037

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manring N D, Mehta V S, Nelson B E, et al. Increasing the power density for axial-piston swash-plate type hydrostatic machines. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(7): 071002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunkis M, Weber J. Experimental and numerical assessment of an axial piston pump’s speed limit. In: Proceedings of BATH/ASME 2016 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. Bath: ASME, 2016, V001T01A048

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu S, Yu B, Jiao Z, et al. Preliminary design and multi-objective optimization of electro-hydrostatic actuator. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 231(7): 1258–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alle N, Hiremath S S, Makaram S, et al. Review on electro hydrostatic actuator for flight control. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2016, 17(2): 125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chao Q, Zhang J, Xu B, et al. A review of high-speed electrohydrostatic actuator pumps in aerospace applications: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2019, 141(5): 050801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris R M, Edge K A, Tilley D G. Predicting the behavior of slipper pads in swashplate-type axial piston pumps. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1996, 118(1): 41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manring N D. Slipper tipping within an axial-piston swash-plate type hydrostatic pump. In: Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Anaheim: ASME, 1998, 169–175

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borghi M, Specchia E, Zardin B, et al. The critical speed of slipper bearings in axial piston swash plate type pumps and motors. In: Proceedings of ASME 2009 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Hollywood: ASME, 2009, 267–274

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manring N D. Tipping the cylinder block of an axial-piston swashplate type hydrostatic machine. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2000, 122(1): 216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Achten P, Eggenkamp S. Barrel tipping in axial piston pumps and motors. In: Proceedings of the 15th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power. Linköping, 2017, 381–391

  12. Zhang J, Chao Q, Xu B. Analysis of the cylinder block tilting inertia moment and its effect on the performance of high-speed electrohydrostatic actuator pumps of aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(1): 169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halat J A. Hydraulic Pumps for High Pressure Non-Flammable Fluids. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2581, 1985

  14. Chao Q, Zhang J, Xu B, et al. Centrifugal effects on cavitation in the cylinder chambers for high-speed axial piston pumps. Meccanica, 2019, 54(6): 815–829

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Chao Q, Zhang J, Xu B, et al. Effects of inclined cylinder ports on gaseous cavitation of high-speed electro-hydrostatic actuator pumps: A numerical study. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 13(1): 245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Dong H, He Y. A novel approach for predicting inlet pressure of aircraft hydraulic pumps under transient conditions. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(11): 2566–2576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong H, Wang Y, Chen J. First attempt to determine the critical inlet pressure for aircraft pumps with a numerical approach that considers vapor cavitation and air aeration. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 234(12): 1926–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vacca A, Klop R, Ivantysynova M. A numerical approach for the evaluation of the effects of air release and vapour cavitation on effective flow rate of axial piston machines. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2010, 11(1): 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gullapalli S, Michael P, Kensler J, et al. An investigation of hydraulic fluid composition and aeration in an axial piston pump. In: Proceedings of ASME/BATH 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. Sarasota: ASME, 2017, V001T01A028

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chao Q, Tao J, Wei X, et al. Identification of cavitation intensity for high-speed aviation hydraulic pumps using 2D convolutional neural networks with an input of RGB-based vibration data. Measurement Science and Technology, 2020, 31(10): 105102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fey C G, Totten G E, Bishop R J, et al. Analysis of Common Failure Modes of Axial Piston Pumps. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2581, 2000

  22. Frosina E, Marinaro G, Senatore A. Experimental and numerical analysis of an axial piston pump: A comparison between lumped parameter and 3D CFD approaches. In: Proceedings of ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 the 8th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. San Francisco: ASME, 2019, V001T01A042

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schleihs C, Viennet E, Deeken M, et al. 3D-CFD simulation of an axial piston displacement unit. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Fluid Power Conference. Aachen, 2014, 332–343

  24. Li T. Study on bootstrap reservoir type pressurized system for civil aircraft hydraulic supply system. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems (AUS). Beijing: IEEE, 2016, 1117–1121

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eaton. Engine-driven pump model PV3-240-18. Available at Eaton website, 2020-7-30

  26. Mohn G, Nafz T. Swash plate pumps—The key to the future. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Fluid Power Conference. Dresden: Dresden University of Technology, 2016, 139–150

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bügener N, Helduser S. Analysis of the suction performance of axial piston pumps by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). In: Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power Conference. Aachen, 2010

  28. Bügener N, Klecker J, Weber J. Analysis and improvement of the suction performance of axial piston pumps in swash plate design. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2014, 15(3): 153–167

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kosodo H. Development of micro pump and micro-HST for hydraulics. JFPS International Journal of Fluid Power System, 2012, 5(1): 6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S. The analysis of cavitation problems in the axial piston pump. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(7): 074502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shi Y, Lin T, Meng G, et al. A study on the suppression of cavitation flow inside an axial piston pump. In: Proceedings of 2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference. Chengdu: IEEE, 2016

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Manring N D, Mehta V S, Nelson B E, et al. Scaling the speed limitations for axial-piston swash-plate type hydrostatic machines. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2014, 136(3): 031004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Svedberg G C, Totten G E, Sun Y H, et al. Hydraulic system cavitation: Part II—A review of hardware design-related effects. SAE Transactions, 1999, 108: 385–397

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bishop R J, Totten G E. Effect of pump inlet conditions on hydraulic pump cavitation: A review. In: Totten G, Wills D, Feldmann D, eds. Hydraulic Failure Analysis, Fluids, Components and System Effects. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2001, 318–332

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Hibi A, Ibuki T, Ichikawa T, et al. Suction performance of axial piston pump: 1st report, analysis and fundamental experiments. Bulletin of the JSME, 1977, 20(139): 79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (Grant No. BX20200210), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M660086), and the Common Technology for Equipment Pre-research Project (Grant No. 41402050202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junbo Lei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chao, Q., Tao, J., Lei, J. et al. Fast scaling approach based on cavitation conditions to estimate the speed limitation for axial piston pump design. Front. Mech. Eng. 16, 176–185 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0616-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0616-0

Keywords

Navigation