Skip to main content
Log in

Centrifugal effects on cavitation in the cylinder chambers for high-speed axial piston pumps

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Raising rotational speed is an effective way to improve the power density of axial piston pumps. However, cavitation tends to happen in the pump’s cylinder chambers at high rotational speeds, which limits the speed increase for a greater power density. The speed-dependent centrifugal effect of fluid is considered as one of important factors influencing this cavitation occurrence. Therefore, this paper presents an extensive analysis of centrifugal effects on the cylinder cavitation. First, an analytical model is developed to analyze the centrifugal effect on the pressure distribution in the cylinder chambers, followed by criteria for the rotational speed and inlet pressure. Second, a computational fluid dynamics model is established to predict the cylinder pressure and cavitation. Both analytical and simulation results indicate that the centrifugal effect creates a radially inhomogeneous pressure in the cylinder chambers. Specifically, the centrifugal effect inhibits the cylinder cavitation near the outside wall of the cylinder bores but aggravates the cavitation near the inside wall of the cylinder bores. From the viewpoint of cylinder cavitation, it is necessary to decrease the volumetric displacement for high-speed axial piston pumps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BDC:

Bottom dead center

CAD:

Computer aided design

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

HDCV:

Heavily damped check valve

N–S:

Navier–Stokes

PCV:

Pre-compression volume

PEV:

Pre-expansion volume

TDC:

Top dead center

References

  1. Ivantysyn J, Ivantysynova M (2001) Hydrostatic pumps and motors: principles, designs, performance, modeling, analysis, control and testing. Akademia Books International, New Dehli

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chao Q, Zhang JH, Xu B, Wang QN (2018) Discussion on the Reynolds equation for the slipper bearing modeling in axial piston pumps. Tribol Int 118:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A-6A1 Commercial Aircraft Committee (2015) Commercial Aircraft Hydraulic Systems. In: SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR5005A), pp 29–33

  4. Maré J-C, Fu J (2017) Review on signal-by-wire and power-by-wire actuation for more electric aircraft. Chin J Aeronaut 30(3):857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fey CG, Totten GE, Bishop RJ, Ashraf A (2000) Analysis of common failure modes of axial piston pumps. In: SAE Technical Paper, No. 2000-01-2581

  6. Ding H, Visser FC, Jiang Y, Furmanczyk M (2011) Demonstration and validation of a 3D CFD simulation tool predicting pump performance and cavitation for industrial applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 133(1):011101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamaguchi A, Takabe T (1983) Cavitation in an axial piston pump. Bull JSME 26(211):72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito K, Inoue K, Saito K (1996) Visualization and detection of cavitation in V-shaped groove type valve plate of an axial piston pump. In: Proceedings of the JFPS international symposium on fluid power, vol 1996, no 3, pp 67–72

  9. Yin FL, Nie SL, Xiao SH, Hou W (2016) Numerical and experimental study of cavitation performance in sea water hydraulic axial piston pump. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 230(8):716–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang JH, Xia SQ, Ye SG, Xu B, Song W, Zhu SQ, Tang HS, Xiang JW (2018) Experimental investigation on the noise reduction of an axial piston pump using free-layer damping material treatment. Appl Acoust 139:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vacca A, Klop R, Ivantysynova M (2010) A numerical approach for the evaluation of the effects of air release and vapour cavitation on effective flow rate of axial piston machines. Int J Fluid Power 11(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunkis M, Weber J (2016) Experimental and numerical assessment of an axial piston pump’s speed limit. In: BATH/ASME 2016 symposium on fluid power and motion control, Bath, UK

  13. Tsukiji T, Nakayama K, Saito K, Yakabe S (2011) Study on the cavitating flow in an oil hydraulic pump. In: 2011 international conference on fluid power and mechatronics (FPM), Beijing, China, pp 253–258

  14. Edge KA, Darling J (1986) Cylinder pressure transients in oil hydraulic pumps with sliding plate valves. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 200(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edge KA, Darling J (1989) The pumping dynamics of swash plate piston pumps. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME 111(2):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris RM, Edge KA, Tilley DG (1994) The suction dynamics of positive displacement axial piston pumps. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME 116(2):281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Totten GE, Bishop RJ (1999) The hydraulic pump inlet condition: impact on hydraulic pump cavitation potential. In: SAE technical paper, No. 1999-01-1877

  18. Shi YX, Lin TR, Meng GY, Huang JX (2016) A study on the suppression of cavitation flow inside an axial piston pump. In: 2016 prognostics and system health management conference, Chengdu, China

  19. Liu W, Wang AL, Shan XW, Zhang XL, Jiang T (2014) Valve plate for piston pump cavitation problem with the damp groove structural optimization. Appl Mech Mater 543–547:154–157

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harris RM, Edge KA, Tilley DG (1992) Reduction of piston pump cavitation by means of pre-expansion volume. In: 5th Bath international fluid power workshop, Bath, UK, pp 167–183

  21. Pettersson ME, Weddfelt KG, Palmberg J-O S (1991) Methods of reducing flow ripple from fluid power pumps-a theoretical approach. In: SAE technical paper, No. 911762

  22. Pettersson ME, Weddfelt KG, Palmberg J-O S (1992) Reduction of flow-ripple from fluid power machines by means of a pre-compression filter volume. In: 10th Aachen colloquium on fluid power technology, Aachen, Germany, pp 181–197

  23. Xu B, Song Y, Yang HY (2013) Pre-compression volume on flow ripple reduction of a piston pump. Chin J Mech Eng 26(6):1259–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison AM, Edge KA (2000) Reduction of axial piston pump pressure ripple. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I J Syst Control Eng 214(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yin FL, Nie SL, Hou W, Xiao SH (2017) Effect analysis of silencing grooves on pressure and vibration characteristics of seawater axial piston pump. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 231(8):1390–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang YC, Dong ZX, Hu XF (2018) Cavitation limiting strategies for pumping system. In: U.S. Patent Application, No. 10/134,257

  27. Bügener N, Klecker J, Weber J (2014) Analysis and improvement of the suction performance of axial piston pumps in swash plate design. Int J Fluid Power 15(3):153–167

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manhartsgruber B (2018) A novel concept for boosting the suction line of piston pumps by piezo-actuated pipe walls. In: BATH/ASME 2018 symposium on fluid power and motion control, Bath, UK

  29. Manring ND (2013) Fluid power pumps and motors: analysis, design and control. McGraw Hill Professional, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singhal AK, Athavale MM, Li HY, Jiang Y (2002) Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluid Eng Trans ASME 124:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou JJ, Vacca A, Manhartsgruber B (2013) A novel approach for the prediction of dynamic features of air release and absorption in hydraulic oils. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 135(9):091305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Manring ND, Mehta VS, Nelson BE, Graf KJ, Kuehn JL (2014) Scaling the speed limitations for axial-piston swashplate type hydrostatic machines. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME 136(3):031004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu YZ, Chen ZN, Qiu ZL, Xu ZS (1989) Measurement and simulation model study of cylinder pressure transient in an axial piston pump. In: 2nd international conference on fluid power transmission and control, Hangzhou, China, pp 471–476

  34. Bishop RJ, Totten GE (1999) Effect of pump inlet conditions on hydraulic pump cavitation: a review. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 1339:318–332

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fraj A, Budinger M, El Halabi T, Maré JC, Negoita GC (2012) Modelling approaches for the simulation-based preliminary design and optimization of electromechanical and hydraulic actuation systems. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, USA

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. U1737110], and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [No. 2014CB046403].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chao, Q., Zhang, J., Xu, B. et al. Centrifugal effects on cavitation in the cylinder chambers for high-speed axial piston pumps. Meccanica 54, 815–829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00977-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00977-6

Keywords

Navigation