Skip to main content
Log in

PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to the identification problem concerning multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) nonlinear systems, this study presents the extended forward orthogonal regression (EFOR) based on predicted residual sums of squares (PRESS) to construct a nonlinear dynamic parametrical model. The proposed parametrical model is based on the non-linear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (NARX) model and aims to explicitly reveal the physical design parameters of the system. The PRESS-based EFOR algorithm is proposed to identify such a model for MDOF systems. By using the algorithm, we built a common-structured model based on the fundamental concept of evaluating its generalization capability through cross-validation. The resulting model aims to prevent over-fitting with poor generalization performance caused by the average error reduction ratio (AERR)-based EFOR algorithm. Then, a functional relationship is established between the coefficients of the terms and the design parameters of the unified model. Moreover, a 5-DOF nonlinear system is taken as a case to illustrate the modeling of the proposed algorithm. Finally, a dynamic parametrical model of a cantilever beam is constructed from experimental data. Results indicate that the dynamic parametrical model of nonlinear systems, which depends on the PRESS-based EFOR, can accurately predict the output response, thus providing a theoretical basis for the optimal design of modeling methods for MDOF nonlinear systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billings S A. Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Spatio-Temporal Domains. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Xia X, Zhou J, Xiao J, et al. A novel identification method of Volterra series in rotor-bearing system for fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 66–67: 557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li S, Li Y. Model predictive control of an intensified continuous reactor using a neural network Wiener model. Neurocomputing, 2016, 185: 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gotmare A, Patidar R, George N V. Nonlinear system identification using a cuckoo search optimized adaptive Hammerstein model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(5): 2538–2546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo Y, Guo L Z, Billings S A, et al. An iterative orthogonal forward regression algorithm. International Journal of Systems Science, 2015, 46(5): 776–789

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. De Hoff R L, Rock S M. Development of simplified nonlinear models from multiple linearizations. In: Proceedings of 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes. San Diego: IEEE, 1979, 316–318

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wei H L, Lang Z Q, Billings S A. Constructing an overall dynamical model for a system with changing design parameter properties. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 5(2): 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen S, Wu Y, Luk B L. Combined genetic algorithm optimization and regularized orthogonal least squares learning for radial basis function networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5): 1239–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Orr M J L. Regularization in the selection of radial basis function centers. Neural Computation, 1995, 7(3): 606–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, 14(2): 1137–1145

    Google Scholar 

  11. Piroddi L. Simulation error minimisation methods for NARX model identification. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 3(4): 392–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Worden K, Manson G, Tomlinson G R. A harmonic probing algorithm for the multi-input Volterra series. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 201(1): 67–84

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Worden K, Tomlinson G R. Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Li P, Wei H L, Billings S A, et al. Nonlinear model identification from multiple data sets using an orthogonal forward search algorithm. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 8(4): 041001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmqvist S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Accuracy of brain amyloid detection in clinical practice using cerebrospinal fluid ß- amyloid 42: A cross-validation study against amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurology, 2014, 71(10): 1282–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers R H. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Boston: PWS and Kent Publishing Company, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. A robust nonlinear identification algorithm using PRESS statistic and forward regression. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2003, 14(2): 454–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang L, Cluett W R. Use of PRESS residuals in dynamic system identification. Automatica, 1996, 32(5): 781–784

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. Automatic nonlinear predictive model-construction algorithm using forward regression and the PRESS statistic. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications, 2003, 150(3): 245–254

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Yang Y. Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure. Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 187(1): 95–112

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Savaresi S M, Bittanti S, Montiglio M. Identification of semiphysical and black-box non-linear models: The case of MR-dampers for vehicles control. Automatica, 2005, 41(1): 113–127

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11572082), the Excellent Talents Support Program in Institutions of Higher Learning in Liaoning Province, China (Grant No. LJQ2015038), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. N150304004 and N140301001), and the Key Laboratory for Precision and Non-traditional Machining of the Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology (Grant No. JMTZ201602).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Zhu, Y., Luo, Z. et al. PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems. Front. Mech. Eng. 13, 390–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-017-0459-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-017-0459-5

Keywords

Navigation