Abstract
Water use efficiency (WUE) is an important variable to explore coupled relationships in carbon and water cycles. In this study, we first compared the spatial variations of annual gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) using four GPP and ET products. Second, we selected the products closest to the flux towers data to estimate WUE. Finally, we quantitatively analyzed the impact of climate change and soil water content on WUE. The results showed that: (1) Four GPP and ET products provided good performance, with GOSIF-GPP and FLDAS-ET exhibiting a higher correlation and the smallest errors with the flux tower data. (2) The spatial pattern of WUE is consistent with that of GPP and ET, gradually decreasing from the northeast to the southwest. Higher WUE values appeared in the northeast forest ecosystem, and lower WUE values occurred in the western Gobi Desert, with a value of 0.28 gC m−2 mm−1. The GPP and ET products showed an increasing trend, while WUE showed a decreasing trend (55.15%) from 2001 to 2020. (3) The spatial relationship between WUE and driving factors reveal the variations in WUE of Inner Mongolia are mainly affected by soil moisture between 0 and 10 cm (SM0–10cm), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and precipitation, respectively. (4) In arid regions, VPD and precipitation exhibit a major influence on WUE. An increase in VPD and precipitation has a negative and positive effect on WUE, with threshold values of approximately 0.36 kPa and 426 mm, respectively. (5) In humid regions, SM0–10cm, VPD, SM10–40cm, and SM40–100cm exert a significant impact on WUE, especially SM0–10cm, and weakens with increasing soil depths, these differences may be related to physiological structure and living characteristics of vegetation types in different climate regimes. Our results emphasize the importance of VPD and soil moisture in regional variability in WUE.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai J, Shi H, Yu Q et al., 2019. Satellite-observed vegetation stability in response to changes in climate and total water storage in central Asia. The Science of the Total Environment, 659: 862–871.
Bai Y J, Zha T S, Bourque C P-A et al., 2020. Variation in ecosystem water use efficiency along a southwest-to-northeast aridity gradient in China. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105932.
Brümmer C, Black T A, Jassal R S et al., 2012. How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 153: 14–30.
Chen N, Song C C, Xu X F et al., 2021. Divergent impacts of atmospheric water demand on gross primary productivity in three typical ecosystems in china. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 307: 108527.
Cleverly J, Eamus D, Restrepo Coupe N et al., 2016. Soil moisture controls on phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone. Science of The Total Environment, 568: 1227–1237.
Dai E F, Huang Y, Wu Z et al., 2016. Analysis of spatio-temporal features of a carbon source/sink and its relationship to climatic factors in the Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(3): 297–312.
Ding J Z, Yang T, Zhao Y T et al., 2018. Increasingly important role of atmospheric aridity on Tibetan alpine grasslands. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(6): 2852–2859.
Du X Z, Zhao X, Zhou T et al., 2019. Effects of climate factors and human activities on the ecosystem water use efficiency throughout northern China. Remote Sensing, 11(23): 2766.
Frank D C, Poulter B, Saurer M et al., 2015. Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nature Climate Change, 5(6): 579–583.
Guo L M, Shan N, Zhang Y G et al., 2019a. Separating the effects of climate change and human activity on water use efficiency over the Beijing-Tianjin sand source region of China. Science of The Total Environment, 690: 584–595.
Guo L M, Sun F B, Liu W B et al., 2019b. Response of ecosystem water use efficiency to drought over China during 1982–2015: Spatiotemporal variability and resilience. Forests, 10(7): 598.
Guo D, Song X N, Hu R H et al., 2021. Grassland type-dependent spatiotemporal characteristics of productivity in Inner Mongolia and its response to climate factors. Science of The Total Environment, 775: 145644.
Hu G C, Jia L, Menenti M, 2015. Comparison of MOD16 and LSA-SAF MSG evapotranspiration products over Europe for 2011. Remote Sensing of Environment, 156: 510–526.
Huang L, He B, Han L et al., 2017. A global examination of the response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to drought based on MODIS data. Science of the Total Environment, 601: 1097–1107.
Huang L, Ning J, Zhu P et al., 2021. The conservation patterns of grassland ecosystem in response to the forage-livestock balance in North China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(4): 518–534.
Huang M T, Piao S L, Zeng Z Z et al., 2016. Seasonal responses of terrestrial ecosystem water-use efficiency to climate change. Global Change Biology, 22(6): 2165–2177.
Huang X, Hao Y, Wang Y et al., 2010. Partitioning of evapotranspiration and its relation to carbon dioxide fluxes in Inner Mongolia steppe. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(12): 1616–1623.
Jiang C Y, Ryu Y, 2016. Multi-scale evaluation of global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration products derived from breathing earth system simulator (BESS). Remote Sensing of Environment, 186: 528–547.
John R, Chen J Q, Ouyang Z T et al., 2013. Vegetation response to extreme climate events on the Mongolian plateau from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3): 035033.
Li G C, Chen W, Li R R et al., 2021a. Assessing the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem water use efficiency across China and the response to natural and human activities. Ecological Indicators, 126: 107680.
Li N, Na R S, Zhang J Q et al., 2018a. Vegetation dynamics and diverse responses to extreme climate events in different vegetation types of Inner Mongolia. Atmosphere, 9(10): 394.
Li S J, Wang G J, Sun S L et al., 2018b. Assessment of multi-source evapotranspiration products over China using eddy covariance observations. Remote Sensing, 10(11): 1692.
Li S J, Wang G J, Sun S L et al., 2021b. Long-term changes in evapotranspiration over China and attribution to climatic drivers during 1980–2010. Journal of Hydrology, 595: 126037.
Li X, Xiao J F, 2019a. A global, 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and reanalysis data. Remote Sensing, 11(5): 517.
Li X, Xiao J F, 2019b. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: A global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sensing, 11(21): 2563.
Li Y, Shi H, Zhou L et al., 2018c. Disentangling climate and LAI effects on seasonal variability in water use efficiency across terrestrial ecosystems in China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123(8): 2429–2443.
Liu N, Kala J, Liu S R et al., 2020. Drought can offset potential water use efficiency of forest ecosystems from rising atmospheric CO2. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 90: 262–274.
Liu R, Pan L P, Jenerette G D et al., 2012. High efficiency in water use and carbon gain in a wet year for a desert halophyte community. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 162: 127–135.
Liu X F, Feng X M, Fu B J, 2019. Changes in global terrestrial ecosystem water use efficiency are closely related to soil moisture. Science of The Total Environment, 698: 134165.
Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M et al., 2015. Water use efficiency of China’s terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought. Scientific Reports, 5(1): 1–12.
Luo M, Meng F H, Sa C L et al., 2021. Response of vegetation phenology to soil moisture dynamics in the Mongolian Plateau. Catena, 206: 105505.
Ma J, Xiao X M, Zhang Y et al., 2018. Spatial-temporal consistency between gross primary productivity and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of vegetation in China during 2007–2014. Science of The Total Environment, 639: 1241–1253.
Ma J Y, Jia X, Zha T S et al., 2019. Ecosystem water use efficiency in a young plantation in northern China and its relationship to drought. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 275: 1–10.
Mao D H, Wang Z M, Luo L et al., 2012. Integrating AVHRR and MODIS data to monitor NDVI changes and their relationships with climatic parameters in Northeast China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18: 528–536.
Martens B, Miralles D G, Lievens H et al., 2017. GLEAM v3: Satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(5): 1903–1925.
McNally A, Arsenault K, Kumar S et al., 2017. A land data assimilation system for sub-Saharan Africa food and water security applications. Scientific Data, 4(1): 1–19.
Miralles D G, Holmes T R H, De Jeu R A M et al., 2011. Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(2): 453–469.
Miralles D G, Jiménez C, Jung M et al., 2016. The WACMOS-ET project (Part 2): Evaluation of global terrestrial evaporation datasets. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(2): 823–842.
Mu Q Z, Heinsch F A, Zhao M S et al., 2007. Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 111(4): 519–536.
Mu Q Z, Zhao M S, Running S W, 2011. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(8): 1781–1800.
Mu S J, Yang H F, Li J L et al., 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage and its relationship with climate factors in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(2): 231–246.
Niu S L, Xing X R, Zhang Z et al., 2011. Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: From leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biology, 17(2): 1073–1082.
Novick K A, Ficklin D L, Stoy P C et al., 2016. The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1023–1027.
Rodell M, Houser P R, Jambor U et al., 2004. The global land data assimilation system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3): 381–394.
Rong A, Bi Q G, Dong Z H, 2019. Change of grassland vegetation and driving factors based on MODIS/NDVI in Xilingol, China. Resources Science, 41(7): 1374–1386. (in Chinese)
Running S W, Nemani R R, Heinsch F A et al., 2004. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 54(6): 547–560.
Ryu Y, Baldocchi D D, Kobayashi H et al., 2011. Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 25(4): 1–24.
Song Q H, Fei X H, Zhang Y P et al., 2017. Water use efficiency in a primary subtropical evergreen forest in Southwest China. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 1–10.
Sun S B, Song Z L, Wu X C et al., 2018. Spatio-temporal variations in water use efficiency and its drivers in China over the last three decades. Ecological Indicators, 94: 292–304.
Tao J, Zhu J T, Zhang Y J et al., 2022. Divergent effects of climate change on cropland ecosystem water use efficiency at different elevations in southwestern China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(8): 1601–1614.
Tao S L, Fang J Y, Zhao X et al., 2015. Rapid loss of lakes on the Mongolian Plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(7): 2281–2286.
Wagle P, Kakani V G, 2012. Growing season variability in evapotranspiration, ecosystem water use efficiency, and energy partitioning in switchgrass. Ecohydrology, 7(1): 64–72.
Wang L M, Li M Y, Wang J et al., 2020. An analytical reductionist framework to separate the effects of climate change and human activities on variation in water use efficiency. Science of The Total Environment, 727: 138306.
Wang M J, Chen Y H, Wu X C et al., 2018. Forest-type-dependent water use efficiency trends across the Northern Hemisphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(16): 8283–8293.
Wu X C, Li X Y, Chen Y H et al., 2019. Atmospheric water demand dominates daily variations in water use efficiency in alpine meadows, northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 124(7): 2174–2185.
Xiao J, Sun G, Chen J X et al., 2013. Carbon fluxes, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 182: 76–90.
Xu H, Zhang Z Q, Xiao J F et al., 2020. Environmental and canopy stomatal control on ecosystem water use efficiency in a riparian poplar plantation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 287: 107953.
Xu Q C, 2021. Spatiotemporal variation of water use efficiency and its influencing factors in arid and semi-arid areas of China. Geographical Science Research, 10(2): 126–136. (in Chinese)
Yang S S, Zhang J H, Han J Q et al., 2021. Evaluating global ecosystem water use efficiency response to drought based on multi-model analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 778: 146356.
Yang S S, Zhang J H, Zhang S et al., 2020. The potential of remote sensing-based models on global water-use efficiency estimation: An evaluation and intercomparison of an ecosystem model (BESS) and algorithm (MODIS) using site level and upscaled eddy covariance data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 287: 107959.
Yang Y T, Guan H D, Batelaan O et al., 2016. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to drought across global terrestrial ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 1–8.
Yao Y T, Wang X H, Li Y et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal pattern of gross primary productivity and its covariation with climate in China over the last thirty years. Global Change Biology, 24(1): 184–196.
Yu S, Jiang L, Du W L et al., 2020. Estimation and spatio-temporal patterns of carbon emissions from grassland fires in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(4): 572–587.
Yuan W P, Liu S G, Yu G R et al., 2010. Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(7): 1416–1431.
Yuan W P, Zheng Y, Piao S L et al., 2019. Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth. Science Advances, 5(8): eaax1396.
Zhang H Y, Zhan C S, Xia J et al., 2022. The role of groundwater in the spatio-temporal variations of vegetation water use efficiency in the Ordos Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, 605: 127332.
Zhang L, Tian J, He H L et al., 2015. Evaluation of water use efficiency derived from MODIS products against eddy variance measurements in China. Remote Sensing, 7(9): 11183–11201.
Zhang Y, Xiao X M, Guanter L et al., 2016. Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 1–9.
Zhao J X, Feng H Z, Xu T R et al., 2021. Physiological and environmental control on ecosystem water use efficiency in response to drought across the northern hemisphere. Science of the Total Environment, 758: 143599.
Zhao J X, Xu T R, Xiao J F et al., 2020. Responses of water use efficiency to drought in southwest China. Remote Sensing, 12(1): 199.
Zhu X J, Yu G R, Wang Q F et al., 2015. Spatial variability of water use efficiency in China’s terrestrial ecosystems. Global Planet Change, 129: 37–44.
Zou J, Ding J L, Welp M et al., 2020. Assessing the response of ecosystem water use efficiency to drought during and after drought events across central Asia. Sensors, 20(3): 581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42061070, No.61631011; Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Survey Special Sub-project, No.2017FY101301-4; Fundamental Research Funds for the Inner Mongolia Normal University, No.2022JBBJ013
Author
Mei Li (1992–), PhD Candidate, E-mail: meili0125@163.com
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mei, L., Tong, S., Yin, S. et al. Spatiotemporal variations of water use efficiency and its driving factors in Inner Mongolia from 2001 to 2020. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 169–194 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2078-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2078-x