Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial-explicitly mapping of the hotspots and coldspots is a vital link in the priority setting for ecosystem services (ES) conservation. However, little research has identified and tested the compactness and efficiency of their ES hotspots and coldspots, which may weaken the effectiveness of ecological conservation. In this study, based on the RUSLE model and Getis-Ord Gi* statistics, we quantified the variation of annual soil conservation services (SC) and identified the statistically significant hotspots and coldspots in Shaanxi Province of China from 2000 to 2013. The results indicate that, 1) areas with high SC presented a significantly increasing trend as well, while areas with low SC only changed slightly; 2) SC hotspots and coldspots showed an obvious spatial differentiation—the hotspots were mainly spatially aggregated in southern Shaanxi, while the coldspots were mainly distributed in the Guanzhong Basin and Sand-windy Plateau; and 3) the identified hotspots had the highest capacity of providing SC, with 29.6% of the total area providing 59.7% of the total service. In contrast, the coldspots occupied 46.3% of the total area, but only provided 17.2% of the total SC. In addition to conserving single ES, the Getis-Ord Gi* statistics method can also help identify multi-functional priority areas for conserving multiple ES and biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari K, Hartemink A E, 2016. Linking soils to ecosystem services: A global review. Geoderma, 262: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Aziz N, Butt A et al., 2015. Spatio-temporal surveillance of water based infectious disease (malaria) in Rawalpindi, Pakistan using geostatistical modeling techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(9): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessa L, Kliskey A, Brown G, 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1): 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baró F, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E et al., 2015. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecological Indicators, 55: 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro A S, Kracalik I T, Malania L et al., 2015. Identifying hotspots of human anthrax transmission using three local clustering techniques. Applied Geography, 60: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite A, Li Q, 2007. Transnational terrorism hot spots: Identification and impact evaluation. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24(4): 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan B A, Raymond C M, Crossman N D et al., 2010. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(2): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F et al., 2009. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15(1): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Chongfa, Ding Sshuwen, Shi Zhihua et al., 2000. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(2): 19–24. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman N D, Bryan B A, 2009. Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecological Economics, 68(3): 654–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L et al., 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Shaofu, Yang Taibao, Zeng Biao et al., 2013. Vegetation cover variation in the Qilian Mountains and its response to climate change in 2000–2011. Journal of Mountain Science, 10(6): 1050–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Minin E, Hunter L T, Balme G A et al., 2013. Creating larger and better connected protected areas enhances the persistence of big game species in the maputaland-pondoland-albany biodiversity hotspot. PloS One, 8(8): e71788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck J, Chainey S, Cameron J et al., 2005. Mapping Crime: Understanding Hot Spots. USA: National Institute of Justice. Available online at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, 2013. ArcGISDesktop: Release 10.2. Redmond, CA: Esri Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe Lucia M, Comín F A, Bennett E M, 2014. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecology and Society, 19(1): 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Lei, 2013. Study on the soil and water conservation function regionalization of Shaanxi Province [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Liu Y, Lü Y et al., 2011. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity, 8(4): 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Zhang L Xu Z et al., 2015. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(4): 833–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Zhao W, Chen L et al., 2005. Assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale using RUSLE and GIS: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation & Development, 16(1): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord J K, 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3): 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimona A, van der Horst D, 2007. Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: A case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landscape Ecology, 22(8): 1255–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra C A, Maes J, Geijzendorffer I et al., 2016. An assessment of soil erosion prevention by vegetation in Mediterranean Europe: Current trends of ecosystem service provision. Ecological Indicators, 60: 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra C A, Pinto-Correia T, Metzger M J, 2014. Mapping soil erosion prevention using an ecosystem service modeling framework for integrated land management and policy. Ecosystems, 17(5): 878–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Burkhard B, Van Daele T et al., 2015. ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295: 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia X, Fu B, Feng X et al., 2014. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 43: 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Bullock J M, Hooftman D A P et al., 2013. Mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70 years in a rural English county. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4): 841–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Xie J, He H et al., 2015. Use of four drought indices for evaluating drought characteristics under climate change in Shaanxi, China: 1951–2012. Natural Hazards, 75(3): 2885–2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Tarazón J, Batalla R, Vericat D et al., 2010. Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport relations in a mesoscale mountainous catchment: The River Isábena (Ebro basin). Catena, 82(1): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Shuangcheng, 2014. The Geography of Ecosystem Services. The Geography of Ecosystem Services. Beijing: Science Press, 75–79. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Yingjie, Yan Junping, Liu Yonglin, 2016. Research on the relationship between dryness/wetness and precipitation heterogeneity in north and south of the Qinling Mountains. Arid Zone Research, 33(3): 619–627. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorencova E, Frelichova J, Nelson E et al., 2013. Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 33: 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü Y, Zhang L, Feng X et al., 2015. Recent ecological transitions in China: Greening, browning, and influential factors. Scientific Reports, 5: 8732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lufafa A, Tenywa M, Isabirye M et al., 2003. Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based Universal Soil Loss model. Agricultural Systems, 76(3): 883–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA [Millenium Ecosystem Assessment], 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Washington, DC Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M et al., 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: An analytical framework for ecosystem assessmentsunder action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R et al., 1987. Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(5): 1387–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A, 2005. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spatial Measurements and Statistics. Redlands. CA: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M G, Suarez-Castro A F, Martinez-Harms M et al., 2015. Reframing landscape fragmentation’s effects on ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(4): 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A et al., 2014. Zonation spatial conservation planning framework and software v.4.0, User Manual. Biodiversity Conservation Informatics Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Finland. http://cbig.it.helsinki.fi/files/zonation/ (Date of access: 01/03/2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn D, Reed S, Berck P et al., 2005. Economics and landuse change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology, 19(5): 1411–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell P J, De Lange W J, Le Maitre D C et al., 2011. The possibilities and pitfalls presented by a pragmatic approach to ecosystem service valuation in an arid biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(6): 612–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao E, Ouyang Z, Yu X et al., 2014. Spatial patterns and impacts of soil conservation service in China. Geomorphology, 207: 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard K G, Foster G, Weesies G et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). United States Department of Agriculture Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, O’Farrell P J, Cowling R M et al., 2009. Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: Finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. Ecology and Society, 14(1): 38. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art38/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter M, Remme R P, 2016. Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: Comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation. Landscape Ecology, 31(2): 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley A N, Williams J R, 1990. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 1768: 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Fu B, 2013. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global and Planetary Change, 101: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Fu B J, He C et al., 2012. Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: A case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica, 44: 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabucchi M, Comin F A, O’Farrell P J, 2013. Hierarchical priority setting for restoration in a watershed in NE Spain, based on assessments of soil erosion and ecosystem services. Regional Environmental Change, 13(4): 911–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabucchi M, O’Farrell P J, Notivol E et al., 2014. Mapping ecological processes and ecosystem services for prioritizing restoration efforts in a semi-arid Mediterranean river basin. Environmental Management, 53(6): 1132–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xiaofeng, Chang Junjie, Yu Zhengjun et al., 2010a. Research on water disrict of soil erosion based on RUSLE: Take the South-North Diversion Middle Route Project in Shaanxi for example. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 40(3): 545–549. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X M, Zhang C X, Hasi E et al., 2010b. Has the Three Norths Forest Shelterbelt Program solved the desertification and dust storm problems in arid and semiarid China? Journal of Arid Environments, 74(1): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Chen L, Fu B, 2009. Effects of rainfall change on water erosion processes in terrestrial ecosystems: A review. Progress in Physical Geography, 33(3): 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W, Smith D, 1965. Rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains, guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. Agriculture Handbook, 282–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Feng Z, Gao Y et al., 2013. Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: A case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecological Indicators, 29: 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yapp G, Walker J, Thackway R, 2010. Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Liwei, Fu Bojie, 2014. The progress in ecosystem services mapping: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(2): 316–325. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Fu B, Lü Y et al., 2015. Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Landscape Ecology, 30(3): 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Lixiao, Song Yuqin, 2003. Efficiency of the Three-North Forest Shelterbelt Program. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 39(4): 594–600. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive advice about the paper, and we also thank Chen Guoyong from the Hunan University, who provided important aid in calculating the annual soil conservation of Shaanxi by MATLAB programming.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liwei Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41601182; National Social Science Foundation of China, No.14AZD094; National Key Research and Development Plan of China, No.2016YFC0501601; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, No.2016M592743; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No.GK201603078; Key Project of the Ministry of Education of China, No.15JJD790022

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zhang, L., Yan, J. et al. Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. J. Geogr. Sci. 27, 681–696 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1400-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1400-x

Keywords

Navigation