Abstract
From 1981 to 2010, the effects of climate change on evapotranspiration of the alpine ecosystem and the regional difference of effects in the Tibetan Plateau (TP) were studied based on the Lund-Potsdam-Jena dynamic vegetation model and data from 80 meteorological stations. Changes in actual evapotranspiration (AET) and water balance in TP were analyzed. Over the last 30 years, climate change in TP was characterized by significantly increased temperature, slightly increased precipitation, and decreased potential evapotranspiration (PET), which was significant before 2000. AET exhibited increasing trends in most parts of TP. The difference between precipitation and AET decreased in the southeastern plateau and increased in the northwestern plateau. A decrease in atmospheric water demand will lead to a decreased trend in AET. However, AET in most regions increased because of increased precipitation. Increased precipitation was observed in 86% of the areas with increased AET, whereas decreased precipitation was observed in 73% of the areas with decreased AET.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Howell T A et al., 2011. Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agricultural Water Management, 98(6): 899–920.
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.
Brutsaert W, 2005. Hydrology: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brutsaert W, Parlange M B, 1998. Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox. Nature, 396(6706): 29–30.
Cox P M, Betts R A, Jones C D et al., 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 408(6809): 184–187.
Doherty R M, Sitch S, Smith B et al., 2010. Implications of future climate and atmospheric CO2 content for regional biogeochemistry, biogeography and ecosystem services across East Africa. Global Change Biology, 16(2): 617–640.
Editorial Committee of National Assessment Report on Climate Change, 2011. Second National Assessment Report on Climate Change. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
Gerten D, Schaphoff S, Haberlandt U et al., 2004. Terrestrial vegetation and water balance: Hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology, 286(1–4): 249–270.
Hobbins M T, Ramirez J A, Brown T C, 2004. Trends in pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.: Paradoxical or complementary? Geophysical Research Letters, 31: L13503.
Hutchinson M F, 1995. Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 9(4): 385–403.
Itenfisu D, Elliott R L, Allen R G et al., 2003. Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculation as part of the ASCE standardization effort. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division-ASCE, 129(6): 440–448.
Jacovides C P, Kontoyiannis H, 1995. Statistical procedures for the evaluation of evapotranspiration computing models. Agricultural Water Management, 27(3): 365–371.
Jones P D, Hulme M, 1996. Calculating regional climatic time series for temperature and precipitation: Methods and illustrations. International Journal of Climatology, 16(4): 361–377.
Jung M, Reichstein M, Ciais P et al., 2010. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467(7318): 951–954.
Kaplan J O, Krumhardt K M, Zimmermann N E, 2012. The effects of land use and climate change on the carbon cycle of Europe over the past 500 years. Global Change Biology, 18(3): 902–914.
Mahecha M D, Reichstein M, Jung M et al., 2010. Comparing observations and process-based simulations of biosphere-atmosphere exchanges on multiple timescales. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences, 115: G02003.
Morales P, Sykes M T, Prentice I C et al., 2005. Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Global Change Biology, 11(12): 2211–2233.
Nemani R R, White M A, Thornton P et al., 2002. Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(10): doi: 10.1029/2002GL014867.
Ni J, Sykes M, Prentice I et al., 2001. Modeling the vegetation of China using the process-based equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model Biome3. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9(6): 463–479.
Ohmura A, Wild M, 2002. Is the hydrological cycle accelerating? Science, 298: 1345–1346.
Peterson T C, Golubev V S, Groisman P Y, 1995. Evaporation losing its strength. Nature, 377(6551): 687–688.
Roderick M L, Hobbins M T, Farquhar G D, 2009. Pan evaporation trends and the terrestrial water balance: II. Energy balance and interpretation. Geography Compass, 3(2): 761–780.
Schimel D S, Braswell B H, Parton W J, 1997. Equilibration of the terrestrial water, nitrogen, and carbon cycles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(16): 8280–8283.
Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C et al., 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9(2): 161–185.
Sneyers R, 1990. On the statistical analysis of series of observation. WMO, Technical Note No. 143. Geneve: World Meteorological Society.
Tao F L, Zhang Z, 2011. Dynamic response of terrestrial hydrological cycles and plant water stress to climate change in China. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12(3): 371–393.
Wang K C, Dickinson R E, 2012. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Reviews of Geophysics, 50: RG2005.
Wang S W, Ye J L, Gong D Y, 1998. Construction of mean annual temperature series for the last one hundred years in China. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 9(4): 392–401. (in Chinese)
Western A W, Grayson R B, Blöschl G, 2002. Scaling of soil moisture: A hydrologic perspective. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 30(1): 149–180.
Wu S H, Yin Y H, Zheng D et al., 2007. Climatic trends over the Tibetan Plateau during 1971–2000. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 17(2): 141–151.
Yin Y H, Wu S H, Zheng D et al., 2008. Radiation calibration of FAO56 Penman-Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China. Agricultural Water Management, 95: 77–84.
Zhang S, Peng G, Huang M, 2004. The feature extraction and data fusion of regional soil textures based on GIS techniques. Climatic and Environmental Research, 9(1): 65–79. (in Chinese)
Zhang Y Q, Liu C M, Tang Y H et al., 2007. Trends in pan evaporation and reference and actual evapotranspiration across the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112: D12110.
Zhao D S, Wu S H, Yin Y H, 2011a. Variation trends of natural vegetation net primary productivity in China under climate change scenario. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(4): 897–904. (in Chinese)
Zhao D S, Wu S H, Yin Y H et al., 2011b. Vegetation distribution on Tibetan Plateau under climate change scenario. Regional Environmental Change, 11(4): 905–915.
Zheng D, Yang Q Y, Wu S H et al., 2008. Eco-geographical Region System of China. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)
Zheng D, Yao T D, 2006. Uplifting of Tibetan Plateau with its environmental effects. Advances in Earth Science, 21(5): 451–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: The “Strategic Priority Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA05090304; Project for Public Service from Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, No.201009056; National Key Technology Research and Development Program, No.2009BAC61B05
Author: Yin Yunhe, Ph.D and Associate Professor, specialized in water and energy balance in land surface system and climate change.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, Y., Wu, S., Zhao, D. et al. Modeled effects of climate change on actual evapotranspiration in different eco-geographical regions in the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci. 23, 195–207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1003-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1003-0