Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Macro and mesoscopic shear behavior of interface between sand and concrete with different JRC under cyclic load

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the interaction mechanism between the sand–structure interface under cyclic loading, a series of cyclic direct shear tests were conducted. These tests were designed with various surface roughness values represented by the joint roughness coefficient (\(JRC\)) of 0.4, 5.8, 9.5, 12.8, and 16.7, and normal stresses of 50, 100, 150, and 200 kPa. A 3D printer was employed to accurately control the surface roughness and obtain concrete samples with varying \(JRC\) values. The test results were used to establish discrete element method models, which facilitated the analysis of the mesoscopic shear behavior at the sand–structure interface during the cyclic direct shear process. The results revealed that the sand–concrete interface demonstrated softening behavior. There is a critical value for the surface roughness corresponding to the maximum interface shear strength. The thickness of shear band, where the changes in porosity were concentrated within, increases with higher surface roughness and cycle number. The coordination number stabilizes after 80 cycles. The distributions of the contact normal direction and tangential contact force exhibited nearly isotropic characteristics after cyclic loading. It was observed that surface roughness amplifies the deflection angle of the main axis in the normal contact force distribution, while reducing that in the shear contact force distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ai J, Chen JF, Rotter JM, Ooi JY (2011) Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 206:269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.09.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alyounis ME, Desai CS (2019) Testing and modeling of saturated interfaces with effect of surface roughness. I: test behavior. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(73)90013-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen W-B, Zhou W-H, Sadowski Ł, Yin Z-Y (2021) Metaheuristic model for the interface shear strength between granular soil and structure considering surface morphology. Comput Geotech 135:104141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W-B, Zhou W-H, dos Santos JA (2020) Analysis of consistent soil–structure interface response in multi–directional shear tests by discrete element modeling. Transp Geotech 24:100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen W-B, Zhou W-H, Yin Z-Y (2023) Recent development on macro-micro mechanism of soil-structure interface shearing through DEM. Arch Comput Methods Eng 30:1843–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09854-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29:47–65. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Desai CS, Drumm EC, Zaman MM (1985) Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces. J Geotech Eng 111:793–815. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(793)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz MS, Lings ML (2006) Postpeak strength of interfaces in a stress-dilatancy framework. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1474)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang H, Wang W (2020) A three-dimensional multishear bounding surface model of granular soil-structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading. J Eng Mech 146:04020068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabowski A, Nitka M, Tejchman J (2021) Comparative 3D DEM simulations of sand–structure interfaces with similarly shaped clumps versus spheres with contact moments. Acta Geotech 16:3533–3554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01255-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Y, Lu Y (2023) Study on soil-rock slope instability at mesoscopic scale using discrete element method. Comput Geotech 157:105268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang M, Chen Y, Gu X (2019) Discrete element modeling of soil-structure interface behavior under cyclic loading. Comput Geotech 107:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang MJ, Konrad JM, Leroueil S (2003) An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies. Comput Geotech 30:579–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00064-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang M, Shen Z, Wang J (2015) A novel three-dimensional contact model for granulates incorporating rolling and twisting resistances. Comput Geotech 65:147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jing X-Y, Zhou W-H, Zhu H-X et al (2018) Analysis of soil-structural interface behavior using three-dimensional DEM simulations. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42:339–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jitsangiam P, Pra-ai S, Boulon M et al (2022) Characterization of a soil-rough structure interface using direct shear tests with varying cyclic amplitude and loading sequences under a large cyclic testing cycle condition. Acta Geotech 17:1829–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01289-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koval G, Chevoir F, Roux J-N et al (2011) Interface roughness effect on slow cyclic annular shear of granular materials. Granul Matter 13:525–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0267-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu F, Fu J, Wang J, Gao Z, Li H, Li J (2022) Effect of the particle size ratio on macro- and mesoscopic shear characteristics of the geogrid-reinforced rubber and sand mixture interface. Geotext Geomembr 50:779–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu F, Fu J, Ying M (2022) Investigation on the cyclic shear response of stereoscopic geogrid-reinforced coarse-grained soil interface. Constr Build Mater 357:129328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu R, Hua D, Chen K (2021) Experimental study on interaction between rock granular flow and different structural forms of rigid retaining walls. Structures 34:3557–3566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu FY, Zheng QT, Wang J et al (2022) Effect of particle shape on shear behaviour of aggregate-geogrid interface under different aperture ratios. Int J Pavement Eng 23:2099–2109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1843035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maghsoodi S, Cuisinier O, Masrouri F (2020) Effect of temperature on the cyclic behavior of clay-structure interface. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146:04020103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan J, Wang B, Wang Q et al (2023) Thickness of the shear band of silty clay–concrete interface based on the particle image velocimetry technique. Constr Build Mater 388:131712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poorjafar A, Esmaeili-Falak M, Katebi H (2021) Pile-soil interaction determined by laterally loaded fixed head pile group. Geomech Eng 26:13–25. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.26.1.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pra-ai S, Boulon M (2017) Soil–structure cyclic direct shear tests: a new interpretation of the direct shear experiment and its application to a series of cyclic tests. Acta Geotech 12:107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0456-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Psarropoulos PN, Tsompanakis Y, Katsirakis M (2022) Dynamic soil-structure interaction between retaining walls, retaining soil and retained structures. Bull Earthq Eng 20:3593–3617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01288-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothenburg L, Bathurst RJ (1989) Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials. Géotechnique 39:601–614. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.4.601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rui S, Guo Z, Wang L, Zhou W, Li Y (2020) Experimental study on cyclic shear stiffness and damping ratio of carbonate sand-steel interface. Rock Soil Mech 41:78–86. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2018.7129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rui S, Wang L, Guo Z, Cheng X, Wu B (2021) Monotonic behavior of interface shear between carbonate sands and steel. Acta Geotech 16:167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00987-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rui S, Wang L, Guo Z, Zhou W, Li Y (2021) Cyclic behavior of interface shear between carbonate sand and steel. Acta Geotech 16:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01002-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saggu R (2022) Cyclic pile-soil interaction effects on load-displacement behavior of thermal pile groups in sand. Geotech Geol Eng 40:647–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01912-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Su L-J, Zhou W-H, Chen W-B, Jie X (2018) Effects of relative roughness and mean particle size on the shear strength of sand-steel interface. Measurement 122:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Subba Rao KS, Rao KSS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1998) Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 131:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/igeng.1998.30112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun Y, Sumelka W, Gao Y, Nimbalkar S (2021) Phenomenological fractional stress–dilatancy model for granular soil and soil-structure interface under monotonic and cyclic loads. Acta Geotech 16:3115–3132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01190-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang P, Yin Z-Y (2022) Effect of particle breakage on the behavior of soil-structure interface under constant normal stiffness condition with DEM. Comput Geotech 147:104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wensrich CM, Katterfeld A (2012) Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM. Powder Technol 217:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu J, Wang ZZ (2021) The dynamic interaction of the soil-tunnel-building system under seismic waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 144:106686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng WX, Liu FY, Zhu XX et al (2022) Discrete element method investigation of shear behaviour of 3D geogrid–sand interface. Geosynth Int. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.22.00289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng W, Ying M, Liu F (2023) Investigation on the cyclic shear response of stereoscopic geogrid-reinforced coarse-grained soil interface. Transp Geotech 38:100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang G, Zhang J-M (2008) Unified modeling of monotonic and cyclic behavior of interface between structure and gravelly soil. Soils Found 48:231–245. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang G, Zhang W, Qi J et al (2022) Seismic response analysis of anchor joint in shield-driven tunnel considering soil-structure interaction. Appl Sci 12:6362. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao L, Yang P, Zhang LC, Wang JG (2017) Cyclic direct shear behaviors of an artificial frozen soil-structure interface under constant normal stress and sub-zero temperature. Cold Reg Sci Technol 133:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou W, Guo Z, Wang L et al (2020) Sand-steel interface behaviour under large-displacement and cyclic shear. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 138:106352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou W-H, Jing X-Y, Yin Z-Y, Geng X (2019) Effects of particle sphericity and initial fabric on the shearing behavior of soil–rough structural interface. Acta Geotech 14:1699–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00781-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52378355, 52078285). We gratefully acknowledge this financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China

    Shixun Zhang, Feiyu Liu & Weixiang Zeng

  2. Architecture and Civil Engineering College, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325025, Zhejiang, China

    Mengjie Ying

Authors
  1. Shixun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feiyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weixiang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengjie Ying
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feiyu Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Liu, F., Zeng, W. et al. Macro and mesoscopic shear behavior of interface between sand and concrete with different JRC under cyclic load. Acta Geotech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02320-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02320-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation