Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic and creep combination effects on the long-term undrained behavior of overconsolidated clay

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft soil subjected to cyclic loading typically exhibits an increase in excess pore pressure under undrained condition which brings the soil to an overconsolidated state. Then, under a subsequent large number of cycles (e.g. more than one million) which also takes time, the creep at overconsolidated state influences the cyclic effect and thus results in a complicated long-term undrained behavior. This paper aims to clarify this long-term undrained behavior of overconsolidated clay. The reconstituted samples are prepared from natural samples retrieved in the north of France. First, the shear strength characteristics along monotonic triaxial stress paths are identified. Then load control cyclic tests on overconsolidated specimens are conducted in fully saturated and undrained conditions. Small cyclic deviatoric stresses are applied in order to investigate more particularly the behavior under a very large number of cycles, during which an unusual pore pressure evolution is observed. To explain this, undrained triaxial creep tests are performed on reconstituted specimens with different values of OCRs under some specified stress states. The evolutions of axial strain, excess pore pressure, stress ratio, stress path, plastic strain rates and stress dilatancy during undrained creep are discussed. The additional undrained creep tests also show that two processes are simultaneously acting in a competitive manner: increase in the pore pressure due to the cyclic loading and decrease in the pore pressure because of creep.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi T, Oka F (1982) Constitutive equations for normally consolidated clay based on elasto-viscousplasticity. Soils Found 22(4):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen KH (1988) Properties of soft clay under static and cyclic loading. In: International Conference on Engineering Problems of Regional soils. Beijing, China. Proceeding, pp 7–26

  3. Andersen KH (2004) Cyclic clay data for foundation design of structures subjected to wave loading. In: Proceedings of the international conference on “cyclic behaviour of soils and liquefaction phenomena”, Bochum, Germany, pp 371–387

  4. Andersen KH, Pool JH, Brown SF, Rosenbrand WF (1980) Cyclic and static laboratory tests on Drammen clay. J Geotech Eng 106(GT5):499–529

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arulanandan K, Shen CK, Young RB (1971) Undrained creep behavior of a coastal organic silty clay. Géotechnique 21(4):359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biarez J, Hicher PY (1994) Elementary mechanics of soil behaviour: saturated remoulded soils. A.A.Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2006) Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1413–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burland JB (1990) On the compressibility and shear strength of natural soils. Géotechnique 40(3):329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai Y, Gu C, Wang J, Juang C, Xu CJ, Hu XQ (2013) One-way cyclic triaxial behavior of saturated clay: comparison between constant and variable confining pressure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(5):797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hicher PY (1979) Contribution à l’étude de la fatigue des argiles. Ph.D., thesis, Ecole Centrale de Paris, France (in French)

  11. Hinchberger SD (1996) The behaviour of reinforced and unreinforced embankments on rate sensitive clayey foundations. Ph.D., thesis at University of Western Ontario, Canada

  12. Holzer TL, Hoeg K, Arulanandan K (1973) Excess pore pressure during undrained clay creep. Can Geotech J 10(12):12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyodo M, Yamamoto Y, Sugiyama M (1994) Undrained cyclic shear behaviour of normally consolidated clay subjected to initial static shear stress. Soils Found 34(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Josseaume H, Hieng IO, Stempfelet JP (1991) Détermination des paramètres de compressibilité d’une argile raide à partir d’essais oedométriques à haute pression. Bulletin de LCPC, pp 109–120 (in French)

  15. Li T, Meissner H (2002) Two-surface plasticity model for cyclic undrained behavior of clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(7):613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortezaie A, Vucetic M (2016) Threshold shear strains for cyclic degradation and cyclic pore water pressure generation in two clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(5):04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian JG, Wang YG, Yin ZY, Huang MS (2016) Experimental identification of plastic shakedown behavior of saturated clay subjected to traffic loading with principal stress rotation. Eng Geol 214:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qian JG, Du ZB, Yin ZY (2018) Cyclic degradation and non-coaxiality of soft clay subjected to pure rotation of principal stress directions. Acta Geotech 13(4):943–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tavenas F, Leroueil S, La-Rochelle P, Roy M (1978) Creep behavior of an undisturbed lightly overconsolidated clay. Can Geotech J 15(3):402–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaid YP, Campanella RG (1977) Time-dependent behaviour of undisturbed clay. J Geotech Eng 103(7):693–709

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Degradation of marine clays under cyclic loading. J Geotech Eng 114(2):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker LK (1969) Undrained creep in a sensitive clay. Géotechnique 19(4):515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang LZ, Yin ZY (2015) Stress-dilatancy of natural soft clay under undrained creep condition. Int J Geomech 15(5):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao YP, Hou W, Zhou AN (2009) UH model: three-dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays. Géotechnique 59(5):451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao YP, Kong LM, Zhou AN, Yin JH (2015) Time-dependent unified hardening model: three-dimensional elastoviscoplastic constitutive model for clays. J Eng Mech 141(6):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yin ZY, Hicher PY (2008) Identifying parameters controlling soil delayed behaviour from laboratory and in situ pressuremeter testing. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(12):1515–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yin JH, Zhu JG, Graham J (2002) A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: theory and verification. Can Geotech J 39(1):157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yin ZY, Chang CS, Karstunen M, Hicher PY (2010) An anisotropic elastic viscoplastic model for soft soils. Int J Solids Struct 47(5):665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin ZY, Xu Q, Chang CS (2013) Modeling cyclic behavior of clay by micromechanical approach. J Eng Mech 139(9):1305–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yin ZY, Yin JH, Huang HW (2014) Rate-dependent and long-term yield stress and strength of soft Wenzhou marine clay: experiments and modeling. Mar Georesour Geotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2013.797060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao D, Hattab M, Yin ZY, Hicher PY (2019) Dilative behavior of kaolinite under drained creep condition. Acta Geotech 14(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0686-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) of China (Grant Nos.: 15217220, R5037-18F).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen-Yu Yin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Determination of plastic strain rates

Appendix: Determination of plastic strain rates

The undrained triaxial condition implies null volumetric strain \( \left( {{\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{a}} + 2{\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{r}} = 0} \right) \). Thus, during undrained creep the incremental deviatoric strain can be obtained:

$$ {\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{d}} = \frac{2}{3}({\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{a}} - {\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{r}} ) = {\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{a}} $$
(A1)

Because of the null change of the deviatoric stress during undrained creep test, the elastic deviatoric strain increment is null. Therefore, Eq. (A1) can be used for the incremental plastic deviatoric strain.

The null volumetric strain condition also implies the relationship “dε pν  = − dε pν ” between plastic and elastic volumetric strains. Thus, the increment of plastic volumetric strain can be obtained by the change of mean effective stress due to the generation of excess pore pressure (dp′ =− du), as follows:

$$ {\text{d}}\varepsilon_{\text{v}}^{\text{p}} = \frac{du}{K} $$
(A2)

with the bulk modulus \( K = \left( {1 + e_{0} } \right)p^{{\prime }} /\kappa \) and \( p^{{\prime }} = p_{0} + \Delta q/3 - \Delta u \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, J., Yin, ZY., Dano, C. et al. Cyclic and creep combination effects on the long-term undrained behavior of overconsolidated clay. Acta Geotech. 16, 1027–1041 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01078-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01078-5

Keywords

Navigation