Skip to main content
Log in

On the behavior of the cured electroosmotic chemical treated clay

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Followed the proposed ECT procedure that was the injection of 0.75 M CaCl2 solution for 72 h, then 1.5 M KOH solution for 48 h, then sodium silicate solution for 72 h and then deionized water for 168 h, the clay strength can be improved from anode to cathode entirely. To further improve the clay strength, curing the sample for different periods and applying electric field over the sample were studied. The cone resistance, water content, pH value, Ca2+ concentration and the XRD pattern were tested or analyzed in each test. Results show that injection of deionized water was a key phase to produce a full improvement of the treated clay, which cannot be replaced by the application of an electric field only and without injecting water. Curing the treated clay after injecting deionized water can yield a higher clay strength in the cathode area significantly due to pozzolanic reaction but produce a lower clay strength in the anode area because the formed NaOH decomposed the gel structure of the sodium silicate solution. To obtain a better strength after injection of deionized water for 168 h, the treated clay had to be cured for about 28 days, along with a dry anode compartment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdullah WS, Al-Abadi AM (2010) Cationic–electrokinetic improvement of an expansive soil. Appl Clay Sci 47:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad H, Leszczynska D, Thevanayagam S (2001) Waste containment by soil stabilization using electro-kinetic grouting method. International Containment & Remediation Technology Conference and Exhibition, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asavadorndeja P, Glawe U (2005) Electrokinetic strengthening of soft clay using the anode depolarization method. Bull Eng Geol Env 64:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM D4972 (2013) Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM D5778 (2012) Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang HC (2011) The interaction between the buffer material and concrete barrier of radioactive wastes in a repository, Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  7. Chang HW, Krishna PG, Chien SC, Ou CY, Wang MK (2010) Electro-osmotic chemical treatments: effects of Ca2+ concentration on the mechanical strength and pH of kaolin. Clays Clay Miner 58(2):154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien SC, Teng FC, Ou CY (2015) Soil improvement of electroosmosis with the chemical treatment using the suitable operation process. Acta Geotech 10:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Fernandes L, Pinto AT (2013) Effects of alkaline-activated fly ash and Portland cement on soft soil stabilization. Acta Geotech 8:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eikenberg J (1990) On the problem of silica solubility at high pH. Nagra Tech. Rep. 90-36. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland

  11. Greenberg SA, Price EW (1957) The solubility of silica in solutions of electrolytes. J Phys Chem 61:1539–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamouda AA, Akhlaghi Amir HA (2014) Factors affecting alkaline sodium silicate gelation for in-depth reservoir profile modification. Energies 7(2):568–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iler RK (1979) The chemistry of silica: solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin YS, Chien SC, Ou CY (2017) On the improvement through the middle area of kaolinite with electroosmotic chemical treatment. J GeoEng 12(4):167–173

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Nazir R, Kazemian S, Huat B (2014) Peaty soil improvement by using cationic reagent grout and electrokintic method. Geotech Geol Eng 32(4):933–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordin NS, Tajudin SAA, Abdul Karim A (2013) Stabilisation of soft soil using electrokinetic stabilization method. Int J Zero Waste Gener 1(1):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Otsuki N, Yodsudjai W, Nishida T (2007) Feasibility study on soil improvement using electrochemical technique. Constr Build Mater 21:1046–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ou CY, Chien SC, Syue YT, Chen CT (2018) A novel electroosmotic chemical treatment for improving the clay strength throughout the entire region. Appl Clay Sci 153:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan X, Chu J, Yang Y, Cheng L (2020) A new biogrouting method for fine to coarse sand. Acta Geotech 15:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thakur L, Umatt A, Shah T (2012) Ground improvement using electrokinetics: chemical grouting and electrokinetic geosynthetic. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Dewatering

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan J, Hicks MA (2016) Numerical simulation of elasto-plastic electro-osmosis consolidation at large strain. Acta Geotech 11:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan via Grant Number MOST106-2221-E-011-041.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Yu Ou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ou, CY., Lin, CY. & Chien, SC. On the behavior of the cured electroosmotic chemical treated clay. Acta Geotech. 15, 2341–2354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00924-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00924-w

Keywords

Navigation