Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamic finite element model of human cervical spine with in vivo kinematic validation

  • Article
  • Bionic Engineering
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Most previous cervical spine finite element (FE) models were validated using in vitro cadaver measurement data from literatures. Although in vitro measurement can provide valuable data for model verification, the in vivo mechanical and physiological conditions of the cervical spine during its natural motions cannot be reproduced in vitro. In this study, a human FE model of skull (C0) and spinal vertebrae (C1–T1) was developed. The in vivo kinematic characteristics of head and neck were obtained from optoelectronic system, and used for the validation of the FE model. The simulation results showed good agreement with the measured data in left/right lateral bending and left/right axial rotation, while discrepancy existed during flexion. The predicted segmental cervical vertebral angles were compared against data from previous in vivo experiment, too. Furthermore, the skin shift data from previous study was used to compensate the experimental measurement during flexion and left/right lateral bending. The results showed the model was successfully validated with the in vivo experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tousignant M, Boucher N, Bourbonnais J et al (2001) Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects. Man Ther 6:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu SK, Lan HHC, Kuo LC et al (2007) The feasibility of a video-based motion analysis system in measuring the segmental movements between upper and lower cervical spine. Gait Posture 26:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N et al (2006) Kinematics of the cervical spine in lateral bending—in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 31:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roozmon P, Gracovetsky SA, Gouw GJ et al (1993) Examining motion in the cervical spine. II: characterization of coupled joint motion using an optoelectronic device to track skin markers. J Biomed Eng 15:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Xiong J (2003) Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations. J Biomech 36:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Descarreaux M, Blouin JS, Teasdale N (2003) A non-invasive technique for measurement of cervical vertebral angle: report of a preliminary study. Eur Spine J 12:314–319

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stemper BD, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N et al (2000) Head-neck finite element model for motor vehicle inertial impact: material sensitivity analysis. Biomed Sci Instrum 36:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang QH, Teo EC, Ng HW (2005) Development and validation of A C0–C7 FE complex for biomechanical study. J Biomed Eng 127:729

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pérez del Palomar A, Calvo B, Doblaré M (2008) An accurate finite element model of the cervical spine under quasi-static loading. J Biomech 41:523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G et al (2002) Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. J Orthop Res 20:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulgheroni MV, Antonaci F, Ghirmai S et al (1998) A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans. Funct Neurol 13:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sforza C, Turci M, Grassi G et al (2000) The repeatability of choku-tsuki and oi-tsuki in traditional Shotokan karate: a morphological three-dimensional analysis. Percept Mot Skills 90:947–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qian Z, Ren L, Ding Y et al (2013) A dynamic finite element analysis of human foot complex in the sagittal plane during level walking. PLoS One 8:e79424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang QH, Teo EC, Ng HW et al (2006) Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine. J Biomech 39:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ha SK (2006) Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3–C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Med Eng Phys 28:534–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panzer MB, Cronin DS (2009) C4–C5 segment finite element model development, validation, and load-sharing investigation. J Biomech 42:480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng HW, Teo EC (2001) Nonlinear finite-element analysis of the lower cervical spine (C4–C6) under axial loading. J Spinal Disord 14:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kallemeyn N, Gandhi A, Kode S et al (2010) Validation of a C2–C7 cervical spine finite element model using specimen-specific flexibility data. Med Eng Phys 32:482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clauser CE, McConville JT, Young JW (1969) Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body. Report. Accession Number: AD0710622, p 46

  20. Cahouët V, Luc M, David A (2002) Static optimal estimation of joint accelerations for inverse dynamics problem solution. J Biomech 35:1507–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boccagni C, Carpaneto J, Micera S et al (2008) Motion analysis in cervical dystonia. Neurol Sci 29:375–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N et al (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech 17:611–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A et al (2001) Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load–displacement curves. Spine 26:2692–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goel VK, Clark CR, Gallaes K et al (1988) Moment–rotation relationships of the ligamentous occipito–atlanto–axial complex. J Biomech 21:673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeshita K, Peterson ET, Bylski-Austrow D et al (2004) The nuchal ligament restrains cervical spine flexion. Spine 29:E388–E393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U et al (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21:212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ (2000) Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. J Biomech 33:1217–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lundberg A (1996) On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research. Hum Mov Sci 15:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mörl F, Blickhan R (2006) Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI. Eur Spine J 15:742–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brolin K, Halldin P, Leijonhufvud I (2005) The effect of muscle activation on neck response. Traffic Inj Prev 6:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the International Cooperation Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (50920105504), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51105167, 51290290, 51290292), Postdoctoral Project (2013M530985), and the Scientific and Technological Development Planning Project of Jilin Province (20130522187JH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihui Qian.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Qian, Z., Ren, L. et al. A dynamic finite element model of human cervical spine with in vivo kinematic validation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 4578–4588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0452-x

Keywords

Navigation