Skip to main content

Automated Calibration of Cervical Spine Motion Segment Finite Element Model for Physiological Kinematics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machines, Mechanism and Robotics

Abstract

Calibration of material model parameters for the validation of spine finite element (FE) model involves the tuning of parameters in multiple spinal components. A method to automate calibration of spine kinematics was developed in this study, which will find application in subject-specific model development and biomimetic mechanisms. Downhill simplex method was used to find the optimum value of twenty-four material parameters in a single motion segment FE model of cervical spine. The model consisted of two vertebrae and the disc and ligaments in between them. Flexion and extension loading cases and combined flexion-extension loading were considered for the automated model calibration. It was seen from the study that a combined consideration of the loading cases is required to obtain a model calibrated in multiple loading directions as spinal components have different contributions in different loading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Noailly J, Lacroix D (2012) Finite element modelling of the spine. Biomater Spinal Surg 144–234e

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oxland TR (2016) Fundamental biomechanics of the spine-what we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J Biomech 49(6):817–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zafarparandeh I, Lazoglu I (2012) Application of the finite element method in spinal implant design and manufacture. The Des Manuf Med Devices 153–183

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones AC, Wilcox RK (2008) Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Med Eng Phys 30(10):1287–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kallemeyn N, Gandhi A, Kode S, Shivanna K, Smucker J, Grosland N (2010) Validation of a C2–C7 cervical spine finite element model using specimen-specific flexibility data. Med Eng Phys 32(5):482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagan MJ, Julian S, Siddall DJ, Mohsen AM (2002) Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc—a material sensitivity study. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 216(July 2016):299–314

    Google Scholar 

  7. John JD, Saravana Kumar G, Yoganandan N (2019) Cervical spine morphology and ligament property variations: a finite element study of their influence on sagittal bending characteristics. J Biomech 85:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. John JD, Arun MWJ, Saravana Kumar G, Yoganandan N (2017) Cervical spine finite element model with anatomically accurate asymmetric intervertebral discs. In: Summer biomechanics, bioengineering, and biotransport conference. Tucson, USA, pp 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF (2014) Application of an asymmetric finite element model of the C2-T1 cervical spine for evaluating the role of soft tissues in stability. Med Eng Phys 36(7):915–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wheeldon JA, Pintar FA, Knowles S, Yoganandan N (2006) Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech 39(2):375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zander T, Dreischarf M, Timm A-K, Baumann WW, Schmidt H (2017) Impact of material and morphological parameters on the mechanical response of the lumbar spine—a finite element sensitivity study. J Biomech 53:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mattucci SFE, Cronin DS (2015) A method to characterize average cervical spine ligament response based on raw data sets for implementation into injury biomechanics models. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanjani-Pour S, Winlove CP, Smith CW, Meakin JR (2016) Image driven subject-specific finite element models of spinal biomechanics. J Biomech 49(6):919–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavecchia CE, Espino DM et al (2018) Lumbar model generator: a tool for the automated generation of a parametric scalable model of the lumbar spine. J R Soc Interface 15(138):20170829

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gurunathan Saravana Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Natarajan, D., John, J.D., Saravana Kumar, G. (2022). Automated Calibration of Cervical Spine Motion Segment Finite Element Model for Physiological Kinematics. In: Kumar, R., Chauhan, V.S., Talha, M., Pathak, H. (eds) Machines, Mechanism and Robotics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0550-5_124

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0550-5_124

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0549-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0550-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics