Skip to main content
Log in

Nepenthes pitchers: surface structure, physical property, anti-attachment function and potential application in mechanical controlling plague locust

  • Review
  • Bionic Engineering
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Pitchers plants of Nepenthes specie growing in infertile habitats have developed highly specialized apparatus for trapping and digesting arthropods to obtain sufficient growing nutrients. Nepenthes pitchers are generally recognized by several distinguishably morphological zones, and different districts exhibit distinct functions in prey capturing, combined effect of the several zones results in great trapping efficiency. This prey ability of Nepenthes pitchers potentially inspires an idea for biomimetic development of slippery trapping plate used in controlling agricultural pests, especially plague locust. In this paper, we reviewed the recent researches of Nepenthes pitchers, including surface structures, physical properties, and anti-attachment functions. Apart from this, combined with our latest studies on mechanical controlling plague locust, the potential application of Nepenthes pitchers as establishing biomimetic models utilized in creating trapping plate was addressed, and several corresponding aspects requiring to be paid attention to in near future were also highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ (2009) Energetics and the evolution of carnivorous plants—Darwin’s ‘most wonderful plants in the world’. J Exp Bot 60:19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thornham DG, Smith JM, Grafe TU et al (2012) Setting the trap: cleaning behavior of Camponotus schmitzi ants increases long-term capture efficiency of their pitcher plant host Nepenthes bicalcarata. Funct Ecol 26:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaume L, Gorb S, Rowe N (2002) Function of epidermal surfaces in the trapping efficiency of Nepenthes alata pitchers. New Phytol 156:476–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benz MJ, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2012) Diversity of the slippery zone microstructure in pitchers of nine carnivorous Nepenthes taxa. Arthropod Plant Interact 6:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riedel M, Eichner A, Jetter R (2003) Slippery surfaces of carnivorous plants: composition of epicuticular wax crystals in Nepenthes alata Blanco pitchers. Planta 218:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu RQ, Zhou Q, Wang SM (2005) Technical development on mechanical control of locust. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Mach 36:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang LX, Zhou Q, Xu SY et al (2009) Investigation of the sliding friction behaviors of locust on slippery plates. Chin Sci Bull 54:4549–4554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang LX, Zhou Q, Niu HL (2010) Influence of photoelectric stimulation with different spectrum on sliding friction behaviors of locust Oedaleus infernalis Saussure (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on slippery plates. Tribol Int 43:1163–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mithofer A (2011) Carnivorous pitcher plants: insight in an old topic. Phytochemistry 72:1678–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen TP, Lennon KA (1999) Structure and development of the pitchers from the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata (Nepenthaceae). Am J Bot 86:1382–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2006) Physicochemical properties of functional surface in pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata blanco (Nepenthaceae). Plant Biol 8:841–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bohn HF, Federle W (2004) Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14138–14143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer U, Bohn HF, Federle W (2008) Harmless nectar source or deadly trap: Nepenthes pitchers are activated by rain, condensation and nectar. Proc Biol Sci 275:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer U, Willmes C, Federle W (2009) Effect of pitcher age on trapping efficiency and natural prey capture in carnivorous Nepenthes rafflesiana plants. Ann Bot 103:1219–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giusto BD, Grosbois V, Fargeas E et al (2008) Contribution of pitcher fragrance and fluid viscosity to high prey diversity in a Nepenthes carnivorous plant from Borneo. J Biosci 31:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merbach MA, Zizka G, Fiala B et al (2001) Patterns of nectar secretion in five Nepenthes species from Brunei Darussalam, Northwest Borneo and implications for ant-plant relationships. Flora 196:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bauer U, Federle W (2009) The insect-trapping rim of Nepenthes: surface structure and function. Plant Signal Behav 4:1019–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer U, Scharmann M, Skepper J et al (2013) ‘Insect aquaplaning’ on a superhydrophilic hairy surface: how Heliamphora nutans Benth pitcher plants capture prey. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280:20122569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang LX, Zhou Q (2010) Numerical characterization of surface structures of slippery zone in Nepenthes alata pitchers and its mechanism of reducing locust’s attachment force. Adv Nat Sci 3:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang LX, Zhou Q (2011) Friction force of locust Locusta migratoria manilensis (Orthoptera, Locustidae) on slippery zones surface of pitchers from four Nepenthes species. Tribol Lett 44:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riedel M, Eichner A, Meimberg H et al (2007) Chemical composition of epicuticular wax crystals on the slippery zone in pitchers of five Nepenthes species and hybrids. Planta 225:1517–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorb E, Hass K, Henrich A et al (2005) Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment. J Exp Biol 208:4651–4662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scholz I, Buckins M, Dolge L et al (2010) Slippery surfaces of pitcher plants: Nepenthes wax crystals minimize insect attachment via microscopic surface roughness. J Exp Biol 213:1115–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gorb E, Voigt D, Eigenbrode SD et al (2008) Attachment force of the beetle Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coccinellidae) on leaflet surfaces of mutants of the pea Pisum sativum (Fabaceae) with regular and reduced wax coverage. Arthropod Plant Interact 2:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaume L, Perret P, Gorb E (2004) How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants. Arth Struct Dev 33:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorb VE, Gorb SN (2011) The effect of surface anisotropy in the slippery zone of Nepenthes alata pitchers on beetle attachment. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai ZD, Gorb SN, Schwarz U (2002) Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol 205:2479–2488

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goodwyn PP, Souza ED, Fujisaki K et al (2008) Moulding technique demonstrates the contribution of surface geometry to the super-hydrophobic properties of the surface of a water strider. Acta Biomater 4:766–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Perez GP, Peressadko A, Schwarz H et al (2006) Material structure, stiffness, and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta: Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol A 192:1233–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scholz I, Baumgartner W, Federle W (2008) Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface. J Comp Physiol A 194:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brennan EB, Weinbaum SA (2001) Effect of epicuticular wax on adhesion of psyllids to glaucous juvenile and glossy adult leaves of Eucalyptus globulus Labillardiere. Austral J Entomol 40:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2002) Attachment ability of the beetle Chrysolina fastuosa on various plant surfaces. Entomol Exp Appl 105:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2008) Contact mechanics at the insect–plant interface: how do insects stick and how do plants prevent this? In: IUTAM bookseries. Springer Netherlands, pp 243–252

  34. Huber G, Gorb SN, Hosoda N et al (2007) Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion. Acta Biomater 3:607–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Persson BNJ, Gorb SN (2003) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J Chem Phys 119:11437–11444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wolff JO, Gorb SN (2012) Surface roughness effects on attachment ability of the spider Philodromus dispar (Araneae, Philodromidae). J Exp Biol 215:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waltraud S, Wolf BF, John MW (1999) Transporters for ammonium, amino acids and peptides are expressed in pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes. Plant J 17:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishisaki K, Arai S, Hamada T et al (2012) Biochemical characterization of a recombinant plant class III chitinase from the pitcher of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. Carbohydr Res 361:170–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hatano N, Hamada T (2012) Proteomic analysis of secreted protein induced by a component of prey in pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J Proteomics 75:4844–4852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gorb E, Kastner V, Peressadko A et al (2004) Structure and properties of the glandular surface in the digestive zone of the pitcher in the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventrata and its role in insect trapping and retention. J Exp Biol 207:2947–2963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mizunami M (1995) Functional diversity of neural organization in insect ocellar systems. Vision Res 4:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lazzari CR, Reiseman CE, Insausti TC (1998) The role of the ocelli in the phototactic behavior of the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans. J Insect Physiol 44:1159–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Erber J, Hoormann J, Scheiner R (2006) Phototactic behavior correlates with gustatory responsiveness in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Brain Res 174:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fowler MA, Montell C (2013) Drosophila TRP channels and animal behavior. Life Sci 92:394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Barry CK, Jander R (1968) Photoinhibitory function of the dorsal ocelli in the phototactic reaction of the migratory locust Locusta migratoria L. Nature 217:675–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Farrow RA (1974) A modified light-trap for obtaining large samples of night-flying locusts and grasshoppers. J Aust Ent Soc 13:357–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinoshita M, Pfeiffer K, Homberg U (2007) Spectral properties of identified polarized-light sensitive interneurons in the brain of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Exp Biol 210:1350–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu QH, Zhou Q (2011) Influence of trapping light source illuminance gradient on locusts’ phototactic effect. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Mach 42:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liu QH, Zhou Q, Niu HL (2011) Comparison and mathematical analysis of locust phototactic response to spectral illumination. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 27:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu QH, Zhou Q (2011) Experiment of locust phototactic response to flash and cosine alternating light. J Jiangsu Univ (Natural Science Edit) 32:148–152

    Google Scholar 

  51. Niu HL, Wang LX, Zhou Q (2013) Influence of light and mechanical stimuli on behavior of locust. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29:152–256

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma ML et al (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2009) Multifunctional surface structures of plants: an inspiration for biomimetics. Prog Mater Sci 54:137–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang JD, Chen HS, Sui T et al (2009) Investigation on hydrophobicity of lotus leaf: experiment and theory. Plant Sci 176:687–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang LX, Zhou Q, Liu QH (2011) Dimensions of surface structures of slippery zone in Nepenthes pitchers and bionic design of locust trapping plate. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Mach 42:233–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang LX, Zhou Q (2011) Function testing of locust slippery plate manufactured based on waxy zone of Nepenthes pitchers. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Mach 42:222–225

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51205107), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2014208056), the Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology (SKLTKF13B05) and the Scientific Research Fund for Doctors of Hebei University of Science and Technology (QD201238). Sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their significantly valuable suggestions and viewpoints to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lixin Wang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Zhou, Q. Nepenthes pitchers: surface structure, physical property, anti-attachment function and potential application in mechanical controlling plague locust. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 2513–2523 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0383-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0383-6

Keywords

Navigation