Skip to main content
Log in

Entanglement dynamics and transfer in a double Jaynes-Cummings model

  • Articles
  • Quantum Information
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

We study the entanglement dynamics for a double Jaynes-Cummings model where two entangled atoms A and B locally interact with independent cavities a and b, respectively, but there are no interactions between locations Aa and Bb. We point out that there exists a parameter range in which simultaneous pairwise entanglement sudden death (ESD) for remote parties, i.e. AB, ab, Ab and Ba, may occur. We show that during this simultaneous ESD period various multipartite entanglement can be created. Our results imply that the pairwise entanglement between two independent locations may be transferred into other multipartite forms which account for the correlations between the two independent locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ding S C, Jin Z. Review on the study of entanglement in quantum computation speedup. Chinese Sci Bull, 2007, 52: 2161–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Man Z X, Su F, Xia Y J. Efficient generation of Bell and W-type states in cavity QED. Chinese Sci Bull, 2008, 53: 2410–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma X S, Zhang J Y, Cong H S, et al. Effect of Dzialoshinski-Moriya interaction on thermal entanglement of a mixed-spin chain. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2008, 51: 1897–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Si L M, Hou J X. Quantum phase transition and entanglement in Li atom system. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2008, 51: 1677–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xi X Q, Zhang T, Yue R H, et al. Pairwise entanglement and local polarization of Heisenberg model. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2008, 51: 1515–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu W Y, Yang Z Y, An Y Y. Evolution of the field quantum entropy and entanglement in a system of multimode light field interacting resonantly with a two-level atom through N j-degenerate N Σ-photon process. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2008, 51: 1264–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Almeida M P, de Melo F, Hor-Meyll M, et al. Environment-induced sudden death of entanglement. Science, 2007, 316: 579–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu T, Eberly J H. Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission. Phys Rev Lett, 2004, 93: 140404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eberly J H, Yu T. The end of an entanglement. Science, 2007, 316: 555–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu T, Eberly J H. Quantum open system theory: Bipartite aspects. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 97: 140403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Man Z X, Xia Y J, Nguyen B A. Entanglement dynamics for the double Tavis-Cummings model. Eur Phys J D, 2009, 53: 229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Man Z X, Xia Y J, Nguyen B A. Entanglement dynamics of W-like states within the framework of triple Jaynes-Cummings model. J Mod Opt, 2009, 56: 1022–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yönaç M, Yu T, Eberly J H. Sudden death of entanglement of two Jaynes-Cummings atoms. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys, 2006, 39: S621–S625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yönaç M, Yu T Eberly J H. Pairwise concurrence dynamics: A four-qubit model. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys, 2007, 40: S45–S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sainz I, Björk G. Entanglement invariant for the double Jaynes-Cummings model. Phys Rev A, 2007, 76: 042313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ficek Z, Tanas R. Dark periods and revivals of entanglement in a two-qubit system. Phys Rev A, 2006, 74: 024304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu R F, Chen C C. Role of the Bell singlet state in the suppression of disentanglement. Phys Rev A, 2006, 74: 024102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui H T, Li K, Yi X X. A study on the sudden death of entanglement. Phys Lett A, 2007, 365: 44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Man Z X, Xia Y J, Nguyen B A. Entanglement dynamics for a sixqubit model in cavity QED. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys, 2008, 41: 155501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Man Z X, Xia Y J, Nguyen B A. Robustness of multiqubit entanglement against local decoherence. Phys Rev A, 2008, 78: 064301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Man Z X, Xia Y J, Nguyen B A. On conditions for atomic entanglement sudden death in cavity QED. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys, 2008, 41: 085503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu T, Eberly J H. Sudden death of entanglement. Science, 2009, 323: 598–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song W, Chen L, Zhu S L. Sudden death of distillability in qutrit-qutrit systems. Phys Rev A, 2009, 80: 012331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang J S, Xu J B. Controlling entanglement sudden death and birth in cavity QED. Opt Comm, 2009, 282: 3652–3655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. López C E, Romero G, Lastra F, et al. Sudden birth versus sudden death of entanglement in multipartite systems. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 101: 080503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaynes E T, Cummings F W. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc IEEE, 1963, 51: 89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wootters W K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys Rev Lett, 1998, 80: 2245–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vidal G, Werner R F. Computable measure of entanglement. Phys Rev A, 2002, 65: 032314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong A, Christensen N. Potential multiparticle entanglement measure. Phys Rev A, 2001, 63: 044301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cao W C, Liu D, Pan F, et al. Entropy product measure for multipartite pure states. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2006, 49: 606–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu D D, Di Y M. C M ×C N D-computable state. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron, 2008, 51: 1300–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huo W Y, Long G L. Generation of squeezed states of nanomechanical resonator using three-wave mixing. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 92: 133102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xue F, Liu Y, Sun C P, et al. Two-mode squeezed states and entangled states of two mechanical resonators. Phys Rev B, 2007, 76: 064305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Han.

About this article

Cite this article

Han, F. Entanglement dynamics and transfer in a double Jaynes-Cummings model. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 1758–1762 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3149-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3149-9

Keywords

Navigation