Abstract
Developing large, soft grippers with high omnidirectional load (above 40 kg) has always been challenging. We address this challenge by developing a powerful soft gripper that can grasp the human body based on a soft-enclosed grasping structure and a soft-rigid coupling structure. The envelope size of the proposed soft gripper is 611.6 mm × 559 mm × 490.7 mm, the maximum grasping size is 417 mm, and the payload on the human body is more than 90 kg, which has exceeded most existing soft grippers. Furthermore, the grasping force prediction of the gripper is achieved through theoretical modeling. The primary contribution of this work is to overcome the size and payload limits of current soft grippers and implement a human-grasping experiment based on the soft-grasping method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen F, Wang M Y. Design optimization of soft robots: A review of the state of the Art. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2020, 27: 27–43
Stano G, Percoco G. Additive manufacturing aimed to soft robots fabrication: A review. Extreme Mech Lett, 2021, 42: 101079
Shintake J, Cacucciolo V, Floreano D, et al. Soft robotic grippers. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1707035
Li H, Yao J, Zhou P, et al. High-force soft pneumatic actuators based on novel casting method for robotic applications. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2020, 306: 111957
Guo X Y, Li W B, Zhang W M. Adjustable stiffness elastic composite soft actuator for fast-moving robots. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1663–1675
Pan Q, Chen S T, Chen F F, et al. Programmable soft bending actuators with auxetic metamaterials. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2518–2526
Tan N, Gu X, Ren H. Design, characterization and applications of a novel soft actuator driven by flexible shafts. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2018, 122: 197–218
Wang R, Huang H, Xu R, et al. Design of a novel simulated “soft” mechanical grasper. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2021, 158: 104240
Liu H, Wang H R, Fan S W, et al. Bio-inspired design of alternate rigid-flexible segments to improve the stiffness of a continuum manipulator. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 1549–1559
Wang N F, Cui C Y, Guo H, et al. Advances in dielectric elastomer actuation technology. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 1512–1527
Kobayashi K, Yoon C K, Oh S H, et al. Biodegradable thermo-magnetically responsive soft untethered grippers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 151–159
Pilz da Cunha M, Foelen Y, Raak R J H, et al. An untethered magnetic- and light-responsive rotary gripper: Shedding light on photo-responsive liquid crystal actuators. Adv Opt Mater, 2019, 7: 1801643
Li L, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. Aerial-aquatic robots capable of crossing the air-water boundary and hitchhiking on surfaces. Sci Robot, 2022, 7: eabm6695
Chen R. A gecko-inspired electroadhesive wall-climbing robot. IEEE Potentials, 2015, 34: 15–19
Chu Z, Deng J, Su L, et al. A gecko-inspired adhesive robotic end effector for critical-contact manipulation. Sci China Inf Sci, 2022, 65: 182203
Brown E, Rodenberg N, Amend J, et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 18809–18814
Hao Y, Biswas S, Hawkes E W, et al. A multimodal, enveloping soft gripper: Shape conformation, bioinspired adhesion, and expansion-driven suction. IEEE Trans Robot, 2021, 37: 350–362
Li S, Stampfli J J, Xu H J, et al. A vacuum driven origami “magic ball” soft gripper. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal: IEEE, 2019. 7401–7408
Li H, Yao J, Wei C, et al. An untethered soft robotic gripper with high payload-to-weight ratio. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2021, 158: 104226
Yap H K, Ng H Y, Yeow C H. High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3: 144–158
Glick P, Suresh S A, Ruffatto D, et al. A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018, 3: 903–910
Gamel K M, Garner A M, Flammang B E. Bioinspired remora adhesive disc offers insight into evolution. Bioinspir Biomim, 2019, 14: 056014
Jiang P, Yang Y, Chen M Z Q, et al. A variable stiffness gripper based on differential drive particle jamming. Bioinspir Biomim, 2019, 14: 036009
Gao Y, Huang X, Mann I S, et al. A novel variable stiffness compliant robotic gripper based on layer jamming. J Mech Robotics, 2020, 12: 051013
Al-Fahaam H, Nefti-Meziani S, Theodoridis T, et al. The design and mathematical model of a novel variable stiffness extensor-contractor pneumatic artificial muscle. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 576–591
Yoshida S, Morimoto Y, Zheng L, et al. Multipoint bending and shape retention of a pneumatic bending actuator by a variable stiffness endoskeleton. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 718–725
Zhang Y, Zhang N, Hingorani H, et al. Fast-response, stiffness-tunable soft actuator by hybrid multimaterial 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1806698
Tolley M T, Shepherd R F, Mosadegh B, et al. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1: 213–223
Best C M, Gillespie M T, Hyatt P, et al. A new soft robot control method: Using model predictive control for a pneumatically actuated humanoid. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2016, 23: 75–84
Hawkes E W, Blumenschein L H, Greer J D, et al. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci Robot, 2017, 2: eaan3028
Coad M M, Thomasson R P, Blumenschein L H, et al. Retraction of soft growing robots without buckling. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020, 5: 2115–2122
Martinez R V, Branch J L, Fish C R, et al. Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 205–212
Uppalapati N K, Krishnan G. Towards pneumatic spiral grippers: Modeling and design considerations. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 695–709
Zhu J, Lyu L, Xu Y, et al. Intelligent soft surgical robots for next-generation minimally invasive surgery. Adv Intelligent Syst, 2021, 3: 2100011
Hu W, Lum G Z, Mastrangeli M, et al. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature, 2018, 554: 81–85
Kim Y, Parada G A, Liu S, et al. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Sci Robot, 2019, 4: eaax7329
Galloway K C, Becker K P, Phillips B, et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3: 23–33
Sinatra N R, Teeple C B, Vogt D M, et al. Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Sci Robot, 2019, 4: eaax5425
Gong Z, Chen B, Liu J, et al. An opposite-bending-and-extension soft robotic manipulator for delicate grasping in shallow water. Front Robot AI, 2019, 6: 26
Wang J, Fei Y, Pang W. Design, modeling, and testing of a soft pneumatic glove with segmented pneuNets bending actuators. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2019, 24: 990–1001
Li S, Vogt D M, Rus D, et al. Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 13132–13137
Heung K H L, Tong R K Y, Lau A T H, et al. Robotic glove with soft-elastic composite actuators for assisting activities of daily living. Soft Robotics, 2019, 6: 289–304
Li H, Yao J, Zhou P, et al. High-load soft grippers based on bionic winding effect. Soft Robotics, 2019, 6: 276–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975505), the Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2022J134), and the Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China (Grant No. ICT 2022B14).
Supporting Information
The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, X. et al. A 0.5-meter-scale, high-load, soft-enclosed gripper capable of grasping the human body. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 501–511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2277-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2277-x