Skip to main content
Log in

A 0.5-meter-scale, high-load, soft-enclosed gripper capable of grasping the human body

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing large, soft grippers with high omnidirectional load (above 40 kg) has always been challenging. We address this challenge by developing a powerful soft gripper that can grasp the human body based on a soft-enclosed grasping structure and a soft-rigid coupling structure. The envelope size of the proposed soft gripper is 611.6 mm × 559 mm × 490.7 mm, the maximum grasping size is 417 mm, and the payload on the human body is more than 90 kg, which has exceeded most existing soft grippers. Furthermore, the grasping force prediction of the gripper is achieved through theoretical modeling. The primary contribution of this work is to overcome the size and payload limits of current soft grippers and implement a human-grasping experiment based on the soft-grasping method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen F, Wang M Y. Design optimization of soft robots: A review of the state of the Art. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2020, 27: 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stano G, Percoco G. Additive manufacturing aimed to soft robots fabrication: A review. Extreme Mech Lett, 2021, 42: 101079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shintake J, Cacucciolo V, Floreano D, et al. Soft robotic grippers. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1707035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Yao J, Zhou P, et al. High-force soft pneumatic actuators based on novel casting method for robotic applications. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2020, 306: 111957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo X Y, Li W B, Zhang W M. Adjustable stiffness elastic composite soft actuator for fast-moving robots. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1663–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan Q, Chen S T, Chen F F, et al. Programmable soft bending actuators with auxetic metamaterials. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2518–2526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan N, Gu X, Ren H. Design, characterization and applications of a novel soft actuator driven by flexible shafts. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2018, 122: 197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang R, Huang H, Xu R, et al. Design of a novel simulated “soft” mechanical grasper. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2021, 158: 104240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu H, Wang H R, Fan S W, et al. Bio-inspired design of alternate rigid-flexible segments to improve the stiffness of a continuum manipulator. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 1549–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang N F, Cui C Y, Guo H, et al. Advances in dielectric elastomer actuation technology. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 1512–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi K, Yoon C K, Oh S H, et al. Biodegradable thermo-magnetically responsive soft untethered grippers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pilz da Cunha M, Foelen Y, Raak R J H, et al. An untethered magnetic- and light-responsive rotary gripper: Shedding light on photo-responsive liquid crystal actuators. Adv Opt Mater, 2019, 7: 1801643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li L, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. Aerial-aquatic robots capable of crossing the air-water boundary and hitchhiking on surfaces. Sci Robot, 2022, 7: eabm6695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen R. A gecko-inspired electroadhesive wall-climbing robot. IEEE Potentials, 2015, 34: 15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu Z, Deng J, Su L, et al. A gecko-inspired adhesive robotic end effector for critical-contact manipulation. Sci China Inf Sci, 2022, 65: 182203

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown E, Rodenberg N, Amend J, et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 18809–18814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hao Y, Biswas S, Hawkes E W, et al. A multimodal, enveloping soft gripper: Shape conformation, bioinspired adhesion, and expansion-driven suction. IEEE Trans Robot, 2021, 37: 350–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li S, Stampfli J J, Xu H J, et al. A vacuum driven origami “magic ball” soft gripper. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal: IEEE, 2019. 7401–7408

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Yao J, Wei C, et al. An untethered soft robotic gripper with high payload-to-weight ratio. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2021, 158: 104226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yap H K, Ng H Y, Yeow C H. High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3: 144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glick P, Suresh S A, Ruffatto D, et al. A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018, 3: 903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gamel K M, Garner A M, Flammang B E. Bioinspired remora adhesive disc offers insight into evolution. Bioinspir Biomim, 2019, 14: 056014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang P, Yang Y, Chen M Z Q, et al. A variable stiffness gripper based on differential drive particle jamming. Bioinspir Biomim, 2019, 14: 036009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y, Huang X, Mann I S, et al. A novel variable stiffness compliant robotic gripper based on layer jamming. J Mech Robotics, 2020, 12: 051013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Fahaam H, Nefti-Meziani S, Theodoridis T, et al. The design and mathematical model of a novel variable stiffness extensor-contractor pneumatic artificial muscle. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 576–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshida S, Morimoto Y, Zheng L, et al. Multipoint bending and shape retention of a pneumatic bending actuator by a variable stiffness endoskeleton. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 718–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Zhang N, Hingorani H, et al. Fast-response, stiffness-tunable soft actuator by hybrid multimaterial 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1806698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tolley M T, Shepherd R F, Mosadegh B, et al. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1: 213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Best C M, Gillespie M T, Hyatt P, et al. A new soft robot control method: Using model predictive control for a pneumatically actuated humanoid. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2016, 23: 75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hawkes E W, Blumenschein L H, Greer J D, et al. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci Robot, 2017, 2: eaan3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Coad M M, Thomasson R P, Blumenschein L H, et al. Retraction of soft growing robots without buckling. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020, 5: 2115–2122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez R V, Branch J L, Fish C R, et al. Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Uppalapati N K, Krishnan G. Towards pneumatic spiral grippers: Modeling and design considerations. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5: 695–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu J, Lyu L, Xu Y, et al. Intelligent soft surgical robots for next-generation minimally invasive surgery. Adv Intelligent Syst, 2021, 3: 2100011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu W, Lum G Z, Mastrangeli M, et al. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature, 2018, 554: 81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim Y, Parada G A, Liu S, et al. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Sci Robot, 2019, 4: eaax7329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Galloway K C, Becker K P, Phillips B, et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sinatra N R, Teeple C B, Vogt D M, et al. Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Sci Robot, 2019, 4: eaax5425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gong Z, Chen B, Liu J, et al. An opposite-bending-and-extension soft robotic manipulator for delicate grasping in shallow water. Front Robot AI, 2019, 6: 26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang J, Fei Y, Pang W. Design, modeling, and testing of a soft pneumatic glove with segmented pneuNets bending actuators. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2019, 24: 990–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li S, Vogt D M, Rus D, et al. Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 13132–13137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heung K H L, Tong R K Y, Lau A T H, et al. Robotic glove with soft-elastic composite actuators for assisting activities of daily living. Soft Robotics, 2019, 6: 289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Yao J, Zhou P, et al. High-load soft grippers based on bionic winding effect. Soft Robotics, 2019, 6: 276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JianTao Yao.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975505), the Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2022J134), and the Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China (Grant No. ICT 2022B14).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, X. et al. A 0.5-meter-scale, high-load, soft-enclosed gripper capable of grasping the human body. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 501–511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2277-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2277-x

Keywords

Navigation