Skip to main content
Log in

Tyramine-enhanced zwitterion hyaluronan hydrogel coating for anti-fouling and anti-thrombosis

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zwitterions have aroused much interest to endow implantable medical devices with anti-fouling and anti-thrombosis performance, due to their ability to form a hydrated layer that can provide a good barrier against protein and cell adhesion. Herein, tyramine modified sulfobetaine-derived sodium hyaluronan (HST) hydrogel coating was fabricated, in which hyaluronan (HA) was used as polysaccharide skeleton to graft zwitterionic sulfobetaine, and tyramine was introduced as crosslinker to construct both the network of hydrogel and a strong covalent bond between coating and substrate. Hydrogel coating was prepared by spin coating or painting HST prepolymer solution under ultraviolet light irradiation. The obtained HST hydrogel coating shows good stability. Moreover, in addition to its outstanding anti-fouling performance and good biocompatibility, it can effectively prevent thrombosis in blood circulation ex vivo. This work offers a universal strategy to prepare a high-performance anti-fouling and anti-thrombosis coating, which is expected to promote the development of functional coatings for biomedical materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carpenter A W, Schoenfisch M H. Nitric oxide release: Part ii. Therapeutic applications. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 3742–3752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaffer I H, Fredenburgh J C, Hirsh J, et al. Medical device-induced thrombosis: What causes it and how can we prevent it? J Thromb Haemost, 2015, 13: S72–S81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Werner C, Maitz M F, Sperling C. Current strategies towards hemocompatible coatings. J Mater Chem, 2007, 17: 3376–3384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Qahtani M, Safan A, Jassim G, et al. Efficacy of anti-microbial catheters in preventing catheter associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients: A review on recent updates. J Infect Public Health, 2019, 12: 760–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng L, Chang L, Si M, et al. Hydrogel-coated dental device with adhesion-inhibiting and colony-suppressing properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 9718–9725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen K, Larsson R, Emanuelsson H, et al. Heparin coating of the stent graft—effects on platelets, coagulation and complement activation. Biomaterials, 2001, 22: 349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S J, Jo H H, Lim K S, et al. Heparin coating on 3D printed poly(l-lactic acid) biodegradable cardiovascular stent via mild surface modification approach for coronary artery implantation. Chem Eng J, 2019, 378: 122116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riedl C R, Witkowski M, Plas E, et al. Heparin coating reduces encrustation of ureteral stents: A preliminary report. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2002, 19: 507–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goh S C, Luan Y, Wang X, et al. Polydopamine-polyethylene glycolalbumin antifouling coatings on multiple substrates. J Mater Chem B, 2018, 6: 940–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim S, Gim T, Kang S M. Versatile, tannic acid-mediated surface pegylation for marine antifouling applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 6412–6416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang C, Ding X, Ono R J, et al. Brush-like polycarbonates containing dopamine, cations, and PEG providing a broad-spectrum, antibacterial, and antifouling surface via one-step coating. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 7346–7351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He M, Gao K, Zhou L, et al. Zwitterionic materials for antifouling membrane surface construction. Acta Biomater, 2016, 40: 142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao M, Sun H, Guo Z, et al. A starch-based zwitterionic hydrogel coating for blood-contacting devices with durability and bio-functionality. Chem Eng J, 2021, 421: 129702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu Y, Wang J, Zhang F, et al. Zwitterionic nanohydrogel grafted pvdf membranes with comprehensive antifouling property and superior cycle stability for oil-in-water emulsion separation. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1804121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoshi R A, Van Lith R, Jen M C, et al. The blood and vascular cell compatibility of heparin-modified eptfe vascular grafts. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niimi Y, Ichinose F, Ishiguro Y, et al. The effects of heparin coating of oxygenator fibers on platelet adhesion and protein adsorption. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89: 573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bannan S, Danby A, Cowan D, et al. Low heparinization with heparin-bonded bypass circuits: Is it a safe strategy? Ann Thoracic Surg, 1997, 63: 663–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conn G, Kidane A G, Punshon G, et al. Is there an alternative to systemic anticoagulation, as related to interventional biomedical devices? Expert Rev Med Devices, 2006, 3: 245–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rong Y, Zhang Z, He C L, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)/peptide hydrogels as an interactive platform conducive to cell proliferation during 3D cell culture. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1285–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sigal G B, Mrksich M, Whitesides G M. Effect of surface wettability on the adsorption of proteins and detergents. J Am Chem Soc, 1998, 120: 3464–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Lin Z, Feng Y, et al. Zwitterionic PMCP-modified polycaprolactone surface for tissue engineering: Antifouling, cell adhesion promotion, and osteogenic differentiation properties. Small, 2019, 15: 1903784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goda T, Konno T, Takai M, et al. Biomimetic phosphorylcholine polymer grafting from polydimethylsiloxane surface using photo-induced polymerization. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 5151–5160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen S, Zheng J, Li L, et al. Strong resistance of phosphorylcholine self-assembled monolayers to protein adsorption: Insights into non-fouling properties of zwitterionic materials. J Am Chem Soc, 2005, 127: 14473–14478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwasaki Y, Ishihara K. Cell membrane-inspired phospholipid polymers for developing medical devices with excellent biointerfaces. Sci Tech Adv Mater, 2012, 13: 064101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lalani R, Liu L. Electrospun zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) for nonadherent, superabsorbent, and antimicrobial wound dressing applications. Biomacromolecules, 2012, 13: 1853–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang S, Cao Z. Ultralow-fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 920–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wen C, Guo H, Bai H, et al. Beetle-inspired hierarchical antibacterial interface for reliable fog harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 34330–34337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ukita R, Wu K, Lin X, et al. Zwitterionic poly-carboxybetaine coating reduces artificial lung thrombosis in sheep and rabbits. Acta Biomater, 2019, 92: 71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang L, Wu H, Liu Y, et al. A robust mussel-inspired zwitterionic coating on biodegradable poly(L-lactide) stent with enhanced anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-hyperplasia properties. Chem Eng J, 2022, 427: 130910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang L, Cao Z, Bai T, et al. Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31: 553–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang H, Jeong W, Hong D. Antifouling surface coating using droplet-based si-arget atrp of carboxybetaine under open-air conditions. Langmuir, 2019, 35: 7744–7750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma Q, Zhang H, Zhao J, et al. Fabrication of cell outer membrane mimetic polymer brush on polysulfone surface via raft technique. Appl Surf Sci, 2012, 258: 9711–9717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang P, Yang C, Liu J, et al. Improving the oral delivery efficiency of anticancer drugs by chitosan coated polycaprolactone-grafted hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2: 4021–4033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang E, Guo Q, Ji F, et al. Thermoresponsive polysaccharide-based composite hydrogel with antibacterial and healing-promoting activities for preventing recurrent adhesion after adhesiolysis. Acta Biomater, 2018, 74: 439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong D, Hao T, Wang C, et al. Zwitterionic starch-based hydrogel for the expansion and “sternness” maintenance of brown adipose derived stem cells. Biomaterials, 2018, 157: 149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dong D, Li J, Cui M, et al. In situ “clickable” zwitterionic starch-based hydrogel for 3d cell encapsulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 4442–4455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Applegate M B, Partlow B P, Coburn J, et al. Photocrosslinking of silk fibroin using riboflavin for ocular prostheses. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 2417–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng W, Liu P, Zhang X, et al. Multi-functional zwitterionic coating for silicone-based biomedical devices. Chem Eng J, 2020, 398: 125663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Parada G, Yu Y, Riley W, et al. Ultrathin and robust hydrogel coatings on cardiovascular medical devices to mitigate thromboembolic and infectious complications. Adv Healthcare Mater, 2020, 9: 2001116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu Y, Yuk H, Parada G A, et al. Multifunctional “hydrogel skins” on diverse polymers with arbitrary shapes. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1807101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Han X X, Li L, Xie T, et al. “Ferrero-like” nanoparticles knotted injectable hydrogels to initially scavenge ROS and lastingly promote vascularization in infarcted hearts. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2435–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bi B, Liu H, Kang W, et al. An injectable enzymatically crosslinked tyramine-modified carboxymethyl chitin hydrogel for biomedical applications. Colloids Surfs B-Biointerfaces, 2019, 175: 614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Raia N R, Partlow B P, McGill M, et al. Enzymatically crosslinked silk-hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomaterials, 2017, 131: 58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang J, Sun H, Li J, et al. Ionic starch-based hydrogels for the prevention of nonspecific protein adsorption. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2015, 117: 384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim K S, Park S J, Yang J A, et al. Injectable hyaluronic acid-tyramine hydrogels for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7: 666–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kurisawa M, Chung J E, Yang Y Y, et al. Injectable biodegradable hydrogels composed of hyaluronic acid-tyramine conjugates for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Chem Commun, 2005, 4312–4314

  47. Fan Z W, Duan L J, Gao G H. Self-healing carrageenan-driven Polyacrylamide hydrogels for strain sensing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2677–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhao R, Yang H, Nie B Q, et al. Highly transparent, antifreezing and stretchable conductive organohydrogels for strain and pressure sensors. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2532–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang F, Hu C, Yang L, et al. A conformally adapted all-in-one hydrogel coating: Towards robust hemocompatibility and bactericidal activity. J Mater Chem B, 2021, 9: 2697–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim E, Kim M H, Song J H, et al. Dual crosslinked alginate hydrogels by riboflavin as photoinitiator. Int J Biol Macromolecules, 2020, 154: 989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kobayashi M, Terayama Y, Yamaguchi H, et al. Wettability and antifouling behavior on the surfaces of superhydrophilic polymer brushes. Langmuir, 2012, 28: 7212–7222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lv J, Zhang G, Zhang H, et al. Improvement of antifouling performances for modified PVDF ultrafiltration membrane with hydrophilic cellulose nanocrystal. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 440: 1091–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hu W, Zhang Z, Lu S, et al. Assembled anti-adhesion polypropylene mesh with self-fixable and degradable in situ mussel-inspired hydrogel coating for abdominal wall defect repair. Biomater Sci, 2018, 6: 3030–3041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nanda H S, Shah A H, Wicaksono G, et al. Nonthrombogenic hydrogel coatings with carbene-cross-linking bioadhesives. Biomacromolecules, 2018, 19: 1425–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gao F, Hu Y, Gong Z, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/heparinized graphene oxide multilayer coating to improve corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2019, 104: 109947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gao F, Hu Y, Li G, et al. Layer-by-layer deposition of bioactive layers on magnesium alloy stent materials to improve corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. Bioactive Mater, 2020, 5: 611–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chang Y, Chang W J, Shih Y J, et al. Zwitterionic sulfobetaine-grafted poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane with highly effective blood compatibility via atmospheric plasma-induced surface copolymerization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2011, 3: 1228–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shih Y J, Chang Y. Tunable blood compatibility of polysulfobetaine from controllable molecular-weight dependence of zwitterionic non-fouling nature in aqueous solution. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 17286–17294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kim M S, Ahn H H, Shin Y N, et al. An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 5137–5143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Morais J M, Papadimitrakopoulos F, Burgess D J. Biomaterials/tissue interactions: Possible solutions to overcome foreign body response. AAPS J, 2010, 12: 188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hong J K, Gao L, Singh J, et al. Evaluating medical device and material thrombosis under flow: Current and emerging technologies. Biomater Sci, 2020, 8: 5824–5845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen S, Li L, Zhao C, et al. Surface hydration: Principles and applications toward low-fouling/nonfouling biomaterials. Polymer, 2010, 51: 5283–5293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Damodaran V B, Murthy N S. Bio-inspired strategies for designing antifouling biomaterials. Biomater Res, 2016, 20: 18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Andrews R K, Berndt M C. Platelet physiology and thrombosis. Thrombosis Res, 2004, 114: 447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zimmerman G A, Weyrich A S. Signal-dependent protein synthesis by activated platelets. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2008, 28: s17–s24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ruggeri Z M, Mendolicchio G L. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Circ Res, 2007, 100: 1673–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ruggeri Z M. Von Willebrand factor, platelets and endothelial cell interactions. J Thromb Haemost, 2003, 1: 1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Yu W, Koc J, Finlay J A, et al. Layer-by-layer constructed hyaluronic acid/chitosan multilayers as antifouling and fouling-release coatings. Biointerphases, 2019, 14: 051002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gorbet M B, Sefton M V. Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: Roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes. Biomaterials, 2004, 25: 5681–5703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lavery K S, Rhodes C, Mcgraw A, et al. Anti-thrombotic technologies for medical devices. Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2017, 112: 2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Gorbet M, Sperling C, Maitz M F, et al. The blood compatibility challenge. Part 3: Material associated activation of blood cascades and cells. Acta Biomater, 2019, 94: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  72. L’Acqua C, Hod E. New perspectives on the thrombotic complications of haemolysis. Br J Haematol, 2015, 168: 175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to FangLian Yao, Hong Zhang or JunJie Li.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1105500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U20A20261, 31870948, 31971250, and 52073205), and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (Grant Nos. 20JCYBJC00660 and 21JCYBJC00560).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supporting Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Z., Yao, M., Sun, H. et al. Tyramine-enhanced zwitterion hyaluronan hydrogel coating for anti-fouling and anti-thrombosis. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 1828–1844 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2048-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2048-1

Keywords

Navigation