Skip to main content
Log in

A flexible organohydrogel-based humidity sensor for noncontact artificial sensation

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a simple organohydrogel based capacitive humidity sensor for noncontact artificial sensation applications. The sensor is simple in design and consists of a transparent polyacrylamide organohydrogel thin film attached on a flexible inter-digit electrode layer. The process of water absorption and desorption is reversible, thus the dielectric of the organohydrogel film as well as the overall capacitance is dependent on environmental humidity. The water absorption capacity and structural reliability of the device have been largely improved by adding glycerol in the organohydrogel network. By optimizing both the glycerol concentration and organohydrogel film thickness, the sensor can respond to cyclic humidity changes in a period of 300 ms. In addition, this sensor achieves a high relative capacitance increase (by 20 folds) in a wide relative humidity range (12%–95%). The sensor also exhibits high stability under different bending curvatures (up to 6.81 mm), wide temperature changes (20°C–40°C) and external pressures (0–8 N). To demonstrate the applications in wearable electronics, we found that the sensor was successful in detecting respiration intensity and rate as well as the difference in moisture content in various objects, i.e., human skin and leaf surface. This sensor is highly sensitive and can be useful in the detection of the wide-range of humidity changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nie B, Huang R, Yao T, et al. Textile-based wireless pressure sensor array for human-interactive sensing. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1808786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Milne S D, Seoudi I, Al Hamad H, et al. A wearable wound moisture sensor as an indicator for wound dressing change: An observational study of wound moisture and status. Int Wound J, 2016, 13: 1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buettner K. Diffusion of water and water vapor through human skin. J Appl Physiol, 1953, 6: 229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kano S, Kim K, Fujii M. Fast-response and flexible nanocrystal-based humidity sensor for monitoring human respiration and water evaporation on skin. ACS Sens, 2017, 2: 828–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McColl D, Cartlidge B, Connolly P. Real-time monitoring of moisture levels in wound dressings in vitro: An experimental study. Int J Surg, 2007, 5: 316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma L, Wu R, Patil A, et al. Full-textile wireless flexible humidity sensor for human physiological monitoring. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1904549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozdemir S, Gole J. The potential of porous silicon gas sensors. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2007, 11: 92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zilberman Y, Ionescu R, Feng X, et al. Nanoarray of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and carbon nanotubes for accurate and predictive detection in real-world environmental humidity. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 6743–6753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borini S, White R, Wei D, et al. Ultrafast graphene oxide humidity sensors. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 11166-11173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Syrový T, Maronová S, Kuberský P, et al. Wide range humidity sensors printed on biocomposite films of cellulose nanofibril and poly (ethylene glycol). J Appl Polym Sci, 2019, 136: 47920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou G, Byun J H, Oh Y, et al. Highly sensitive wearable textilebased humidity sensor made of high-strength, single-walled carbon nanotube/poly (vinyl alcohol) filaments. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2017, 9: 4788–4797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trung T Q, Duy L T, Ramasundaram S, et al. Transparent, stretchable, and rapid-response humidity sensor for body-attachable wearable electronics. Nano Res, 2017, 10: 2021–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Tian M, Zhang Y, et al. Helical core-sheath elastic yarn-based dual strain/humidity sensors with MXene sensing layer. J Mater Sci, 2020, 55: 6187–6194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jalkanen T, Mäkilä E, Määttänen A, et al. Porous silicon micro- and nanoparticles for printed humidity sensors. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101: 263110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mogera U, Sagade A A, George S J, et al. Ultrafast response humidity sensor using supramolecular nanofibre and its application in monitoring breath humidity and flow. Sci Rep, 2015, 4: 4103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Squillaci M A, Ferlauto L, Zagranyarski Y, et al. Self-assembly of an amphiphilic p-conjugated dyad into fibers: Ultrafast and ultrasensitive humidity sensor. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3170–3174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li T, Li L, Sun H, et al. Porous ionic membrane based flexible humidity sensor and its multifunctional applications. Adv Sci, 2017, 4: 1600404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang D, Tong J, Xia B, et al. Ultrahigh performance humidity sensor based on layer-by-layer self-assembly of graphene oxide/polyelectrolyte nanocomposite film. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2014, 203: 263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bi H, Yin K, Xie X, et al. Ultrahigh humidity sensitivity of graphene oxide. Sci Rep, 2013, 3: 2714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi R, Zhang T, Guan X, et al. Capacitive humidity sensors based on mesoporous silica and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) composites. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2020, 565: 592–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Muralter F, Greco F, Coclite A M. Applicability of vapor-deposited thermoresponsive hydrogel thin films in ultrafast humidity sensors/actuators. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2020, 2: 1160–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin M, Sun M, Bai R, et al. Bioinspired hydrogel interferometer for adaptive coloration and chemical sensing. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1800468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang J, Kang K, Raeis-Hosseini N, et al. Self-powered humidity sensor using chitosan-based plasmonic metal-hydrogel-metal filters. Adv Opt Mater, 2020, 8: 1901932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gulnizkij N, Gerlach G. Bistable threshold humidity sensor switch with rectangular bimorph bending plate. Micromachines, 2020, 11: 569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lopez-Torres D, Elosua C, Villatoro J, et al. Photonic crystal fiber interferometer coated with a PAH/PAA nanolayer as humidity sensor. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2017, 242: 1065–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu D, Hu T, Zhao Y, et al. High-performance self-powered/active humidity sensing of Fe-doped ZnO nanoarray nanogenerator. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2015, 213: 382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu Y, He H, Zhao T, et al. A self-powered breath Analyzer based on PANI/PVDF piezo-gas-sensing arrays for potential diagnostics application. Nano-Micro Lett, 2018, 10: 76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu J, Wu Z, Xu H, et al. An intrinsically stretchable humidity sensor based on anti-drying, self-healing and transparent organohydrogels. Mater Horiz, 2019, 6: 595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao J, Li N, Yu H, et al. Highly sensitive MoS2 humidity sensors array for noncontact sensation. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 1702076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim Y, Jung B, Lee H, et al. Capacitive humidity sensor design based on anodic aluminum oxide. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2009, 141: 441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu Z, Ding H, Tao K, et al. Ultrasensitive, stretchable, and fastresponse temperature sensors based on hydrogel films for wearable applications. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2021, 13: 21854–21864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu J, Wu Z, Huang W, et al. Stretchable, stable, and room-temperature gas sensors based on self-healing and transparent organohydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2020, 12: 52070–52081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dong Y, Akinoglu E M, Zhang H, et al. An optically responsive soft etalon based on ultrathin cellulose hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29: 1904290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bian C, Wang J, Bai X, et al. Optical fiber based on humidity sensor with improved sensitivity for monitoring applications. Optics Laser Tech, 2020, 130: 106342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bian C, Cheng Y, Zhu W, et al. A novel optical fiber mach-zehnder interferometer based on the calcium alginate hydrogel film for humidity sensing. IEEE Sens J, 2020, 20: 5759–5765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li W, Feng R, Wang R, et al. Polyelectrolyte-based physical adhesive hydrogels with excellent mechanical properties for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B, 2018, 6: 4799–4807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee S, Seo M, Lee M. Highly sensitive moisture sensor with a hydrogel film coated on surface-textured stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci, 2019, 484: 1149–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen W, Wu G, Zhang M, et al. Angle-independent optical moisture sensors based on hydrogel-coated plasmonic lattice arrays. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2018, 1: 1430–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Z, Yang X, Wu J. Conductive hydrogel- and organohydrogelbased stretchable sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2021, 13: 2128–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fayter A E R, Gibson M I, Draper E R. Sub-zero temperature mechanically stable low molecular weight hydrogels. J Mater Chem B, 2018, 6: 7274–7279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guo M, Wu Y, Xue S, et al. A highly stretchable, ultra-tough, remarkably tolerant, and robust self-healing glycerol-hydrogel for a dual-responsive soft actuator. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 25969–25977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsouti V, Boutopoulos C, Zergioti I, et al. Capacitive microsystems for biological sensing. Biosens Bioelectron, 2011, 27: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang J, Bai R, Chen B, et al. Hydrogel adhesion: A supramolecular synergy of chemistry, topology, and mechanics. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 1901693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang J, Su C Y. Metal-organic gels: From discrete metallogelators to coordination polymers. Coord Chem Rev, 2013, 257: 1373–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mehmood N, Hariz A, Templeton S, et al. A flexible and low power telemetric sensing and monitoring system for chronic wound diagnostics. Biomed Eng Online, 2015, 14: 17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu J, Sun Y M, Wu Z, et al. Carbon nanocoil-based fast-response and flexible humidity sensor for multifunctional applications. ACS Appl Mater Interface, 2019, 11: 4242–4251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu J, Wu Z, Tao K, et al. Rapid-response, reversible and flexible humidity sensing platform using a hydrophobic and porous substrate. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7: 2063–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fleming S, Thompson M, Stevens R, et al. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: A systematic review of observational studies. Lancet, 2011, 377: 1011–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yañez A M, Guerrero D, de Alejo R P, et al. Monitoring breathing rate at home allows early identification of COPD exacerbations. Chest, 2012, 142: 1524–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Peppard P E, Young T, Barnet J H, et al. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol, 2013, 177: 1006–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith A D, Elgammal K, Niklaus F, et al. Resistive graphene humidity sensors with rapid and direct electrical readout. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 19099–19109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Güder F, Ainla A, Redston J, et al. Paper-based electrical respiration sensor. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55: 5727–5732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Strollo Jr. P J, Soose R J, Maurer J T, et al. Upper-airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370: 139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Caples S M, Gami A S, Somers V K. Obstructive sleep apnea. Ann Int Med, 2005, 142: 187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to BaoQing Nie or Liang Hu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61601317 and 51873137), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 20KJB510001), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), and the National Key R&D Plan “Key Scientific Issues of Transformative Technology” (Grant No. 2018YFA0701700). The authors also thank GENG JiaLei, XIAO WenYe, ZHAO MengYing, and FENG TingTing for their helps in photo shooting in this work. The authors would like to express their gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.com/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Li, C., Yang, H. et al. A flexible organohydrogel-based humidity sensor for noncontact artificial sensation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 191–200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1912-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1912-1

Keywords

Navigation