Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent surrounding soil pressure and mechanical response of tunnel lining induced by surrounding soil viscosity

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical simulation method of shield tunnel excavation is developed to capture the time-dependent deformation behaviour of surrounding soil. The simulation method consists of four parts: (i) an elastic-plastic-viscous constitutive model that can not only reasonably describe the viscous deformation behaviour of soil, but also appropriately calculate the plastic deformation under typical stress paths of excavation; (ii) simulation of main factors related to shield tunnel excavation, including the shield machine, face pressure, lining, grout behavior, and contacts between multiple media; (iii) a simulation procedure for excavation to reflect the process of shield tunnel excavation and achieve reasonable stress and strain fields at the end of the construction stage; (iv) a creep process that is used to investigate the long-term mechanical behaviours of the surrounding soil and tunnel lining. Taking the CK570H tunnel project in Taipei as the background, a numerical simulation is conducted by adopting the developed simulation method. Based on the simulation results, the radial and circumferential stresses acting on the lining, which are induced by the surrounding soil viscosity, are analysed. The rule of the mechanical response of lining, including its deformation, bending moment, and axial force, with time is revealed. On this basis, the long-term safety of the lining is evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bjerrum L. Engineering geology of Norwegian normally-consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings. Géotechnique, 1967, 17: 83–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morsy M M, Morgenstern N R, Chan D H. Simulation of creep deformation in the foundation of Tar Island Dyke. Can Geotech J, 1995, 32: 1002-1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Federico A, Popescu M, Elia G, et al. Prediction of time to slope failure: A general framework. Environ Earth Sci, 2012, 66: 245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamsawang P, Boathong P, Mairaing W, et al. Undrained creep failure of a drainage canal slope stabilized with deep cement mixing columns. Landslides, 2016, 13: 939–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mair R J. Tunnelling and geotechnics: New horizons. Géotechnique, 2008, 58: 695–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng C W W, Liu G B, Li Q. Investigation of the long-term tunnel settlement mechanisms of the first metro line in Shanghai. Can Geotech J, 2013, 50: 674–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di H, Zhou S, Xiao J, et al. Investigation of the long-term settlement of a cut-and-cover metro tunnel in a soft deposit. Eng Geol, 2016, 204: 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirlaw J N. Observed and calculated pore pressures and deformations induced by an earth balance shield: Discussion. Can Geotech J, 1995, 32: 181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Causse L, Cojean R, Fleurisson J A. Interaction between tunnel and unstable slope—Influence of time-dependent behavior of a tunnel excavation in a deep-seated gravitational slope deformation. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2015, 50: 270–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wongsaroj J, Soga K, Mair R J. Tunnelling-induced consolidation settlements in London Clay. Géotechnique, 2013, 63: 1103–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Z, Wong R C K, Li S, et al. Finite element analysis of long-term surface settlement above a shallow tunnel in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2012, 30: 85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jallow A, Ou C Y, Lim A. Three-dimensional numerical study of long-term settlement induced in shield tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2019, 88: 221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu G, He C, Yang Q, et al. Progressive failure process of secondary lining of a tunnel under creep effect of surrounding rock. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2019, 90: 76–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao Y, Lu N, Yang Y, et al. Study of long-termed displacements of a tunnel boring machine during its stoppage. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2019, 84: 432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H N, Zeng G S, Utili S, et al. Analytical solutions of stresses and displacements for deeply buried twin tunnels in viscoelastic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2017, 93: 13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu D, Kong F, Du X, et al. Fractional viscoelastic analytical solution for the ground displacement of a shallow tunnel based on a timedependent unified displacement function. Comput Geotech, 2020, 117: 103284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Huang M, Pan Y, et al. Analytical prediction of time-dependent behavior for tunneling-induced ground movements and stresses subjected to surcharge loading based on rheological mechanics. Comput Geotech, 2021, 129: 103858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. di Prisco C, Flessati L, Frigerio G, et al. Experimental investigation of the time-dependent response of unreinforced and reinforced tunnel faces in cohesive soils. Acta Geotech, 2018, 13: 651–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu H, Ye B, Cai Y, et al. An elasto-viscoplastic model for soft rock around tunnels considering overconsolidation and structure effects. Comput Geotech, 2013, 50: 6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen S L, Wu H N, Cui Y J, et al. Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2014, 40: 309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao K, Janutolo M, Barla G, et al. 3D simulation of TBM excavation in brittle rock associated with fault zones: The Brenner exploratory tunnel case. Eng Geol, 2014, 181: 93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng G, Lu P, Diao Y. Advance speed-based parametric study of greenfield deformation induced by EPBM tunneling in soft ground. Comput Geotech, 2015, 65: 220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gui M W, Chen S L. Estimation of transverse ground surface settlement induced by DOT shield tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2013, 33: 119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharifzadeh M, Tarifard A, Moridi M A. Time-dependent behavior of tunnel lining in weak rock mass based on displacement back analysis method. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2013, 38: 348–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao K, Janutolo M, Barla G. A completely 3D model for the simulation of mechanized tunnel excavation. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2012, 45: 475–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kavvadas M, Litsas D, Vazaios I, et al. Development of a 3D finite element model for shield EPB tunnelling. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2017, 65: 22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu Z Z, Chen S S, Wei K M. A generalized plasticity model for the stress-strain and creep behavior of rockfill materials. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao Y, Wang C, Zhang Z, et al. Constitutive modeling for two sands under high pressure. Int J Geomech, 2021, 21: 04021042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin J H, Zhu J G, Graham J. A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: Theory and verification. Can Geotech J, 2002, 39: 157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yin Z Y, Xu Q, Yu C. Elastic-viscoplastic modeling for natural soft clays considering nonlinear creep. Int J Geomech, 2015, 15: 6014001

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yao Y P, Kong L M, Zhou A N, et al. Time-dependent unified hardening model: Three-dimensional elastoviscoplastic constitutive model for clays. J Eng Mech, 2015, 141: 04014162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qiao Y, Ferrari A, Laloui L, et al. Nonstationary flow surface theory for modeling the viscoplastic behaviors of soils. Comput Geotech, 2016, 76: 105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Islam M N, Gnanendran C T. Elastic-viscoplastic model for clays: Development, validation, and application. J Eng Mech, 2017, 143: 04017121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu D C, Miao J B, Du X L, et al. A new method of developing elasticplastic- viscous constitutive model for clays. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Debernardi D, Barla G. New viscoplastic model for design analysis of tunnels in squeezing conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2009, 42: 259–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schanz T, Vermeer P A, Bonnier P G. The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification. In: Proceedings of International Symptom Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics-10 Years of Plaxis International. Rotterdam, 1999. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tornborg J, Karlsson M, Kullingsjö A, et al. Modelling the construction and long-term response of Göta Tunnel. Comput Geotech, 2021, 134: 104027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Purwodihardjo A, Cambou B. Time-dependent modelling for soils and its application in tunnelling. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2005, 29: 49–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu D C, Miao J B, Du X L, et al. A 3D elastic-plastic-viscous constitutive model for soils considering the stress path dependency. Sci hina Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 791–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abaqus. Abaqus User’s Manual Version 6.12. Providence: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., 2012

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yao Y P, Lu D C, Zhou A N, et al. Generalized non-linear strength theory and transformed stress space. Sci China Tech Sci, 2004, 47: 691–709

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Lade P V, Liggio Jr. C D, Nam J. Strain rate, creep, and stress dropcreep experiments on crushed coral sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2009, 135: 941–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kasper T, Meschke G. On the influence of face pressure, grouting pressure and TBM design in soft ground tunnelling. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2006, 21: 160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chapman D N, Ahn S K, Hunt D V. Investigating ground movements caused by the construction of multiple tunnels in soft ground using laboratory model tests. Can Geotech J, 2007, 44: 631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gui M W, Chien M C. Blast-resistant analysis for a tunnel passing beneath Taipei Shongsan Airport—a parametric study. Geotech Geol Eng, 2006, 24: 227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vermeer P A, de Borst R. Non-associated plasticity for soils, concrete and rock. Heron, 1984, 29: 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kasper T, Meschke G. A 3D finite element simulation model for TBM tunnelling in soft ground. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2004, 28: 1441–1460

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang M, Li S, Li P. Numerical analysis of ground displacement and segmental stress and influence of yaw excavation loadings for a curved shield tunnel. Comput Geotech, 2020, 118: 103325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Carranza-Torres C, Diederichs M. Mechanical analysis of circular liners with particular reference to composite supports. For example, liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets. Tunn Undergr Space Tech, 2009, 24: 506–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. China Academy of Building Research. Code for design of concrete structures (in Chinese). GB 50010. 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DeChun Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miao, J., Lu, D., Lin, Q. et al. Time-dependent surrounding soil pressure and mechanical response of tunnel lining induced by surrounding soil viscosity. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 2453–2468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1908-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1908-6

Keywords

Navigation