Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)/peptide hydrogels as an interactive platform conducive to cell proliferation during 3D cell culture

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of extracellular matrix (ECM) to dynamic cell signals is of great significance for the regulation of cell behavior. In the present study, we prepared a type of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-sensitive degradable hydrogels (MSDHs) via the catalyst-free o-phthalaldehyde (OPA)/amine cross-linking reaction between o-phthalaldehyde-grafted four-arm poly(ethylene glycol) (4aPEG-OPA) and an MMP-sensitive degradable peptide. The gelation rates and storage moduli of MSDHs and the MMP-insensitive hydrogels (MIHs) based on an MMP-insensitive scramble peptide were comparable and dependent on the concentrations of precursor polymers. MSDHs were degradable while MIHs were stable in the presence of proteinase in vitro. The degradation of MSDHs was obviously faster than that of MIHs after subcutaneous injection into rats. In addition, both types of poly(ethylene glycol)/peptide hydrogels displayed excellent cytocompatibility in vitro, and showed good histocompatibility in vivo in the subcutaneous layer of rats. Furthermore, the proliferation of several MMP-expressing cell lines including MDA-MB-231 cells within MSDHs was obviously faster than that in MIHs, indicating the influence of metabolism-mediated scaffold degradation on the cell proliferation. This study provides a new biocompatible and biodegradable 3D cell culture interactive platform for regulation of cell behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frantz C, Stewart K M, Weaver V M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci, 2010, 123: 4195–4200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouw J K, Ou G, Weaver V M. Extracellular matrix assembly: A multiscale deconstruction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2014, 15: 771–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker C, Mojares E, Del Río Hernández A. Role of extracellular matrix in development and cancer progression. IJMS, 2018, 19: 3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicolas J, Magli S, Rabbachin L, et al. 3D extracellular matrix mimics: Fundamental concepts and role of materials chemistry to influence stem cell fate. Biomacromolecules, 2020, 21: 1968–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hussey G S, Dziki J L, Badylak S F. Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Mater, 2018, 3: 159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li W, Yan Z, Ren J, et al. Manipulating cell fate: Dynamic control of cell behaviors on functional platforms. Chem Soc Rev, 2018, 47: 8639–8684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niklason L E. Understanding the extracellular matrix to enhance stem cell-based tissue regeneration. Cell Stem Cell, 2018, 22: 302–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tam R Y, Smith L J, Shoichet M S. Engineering cellular microenvironments with photo- and enzymatically responsive hydrogels: Toward biomimetic 3D cell culture models. Acc Chem Res, 2017, 50: 703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosales A M, Anseth K S. The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. Nat Rev Mater, 2016, 1: 15012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H B, Li H F, Wu Y H, et al. A high strength, anti-fouling, self-healable, and thermoplastic supramolecular polymer hydrogel with low fibrotic response. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rong Y, Zhang Z, He C, et al. Bioactive polypeptide hydrogels modified with RGD and N-cadherin mimetic peptide promote chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Sci China Chem, 2020, 63: 1100–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi S, Yu S J, Li G, et al. Biocompatible in situ-forming glycopolypeptide hydrogels. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 992–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu J. Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 4639–4656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu L, Ding J. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem Soc Rev, 2008, 37: 1473–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ko D Y, Shinde U P, Yeon B, et al. Recent progress of in situ formed gels for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci, 2013, 38: 672–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, He C, Rong Y, et al. A fast and versatile cross-linking strategy via o-phthalaldehyde condensation for mechanically strengthened and functional hydrogels. Natl Sci Rev, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa128

  18. Do Minh T, Johnson A L, Jones J E, et al. Reactions of phthalaldehyde with ammonia and amines. J Org Chem, 1977, 42: 4217–4221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma Y, Lv Z, Li T, et al. Design and synthesis of ortho-phthalaldehyde phosphoramidite for single-step, rapid, efficient and chemoselective coupling of DNA with proteins under physiological conditions. Chem Commun, 2018, 54: 9434–9437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kharkar P M, Kiick K L, Kloxin A M. Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42: 7335–7372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koetting M C, Peters J T, Steichen S D, et al. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels: Theory, modern advances, and applications. Mater Sci Eng-R-Rep, 2015, 93: 1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu S, Cao H, Guo R, et al. Effects of the proportion of two different cross-linkers on the material and biological properties of enzymatically degradable PEG hydrogels. Polym Degradation Stability, 2020, 172: 109067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma S Q, Zhang Y P, Wang M, et al. Recent progress in 4D printing of stimuli-responsive polymeric materials. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Circ Res, 2003, 92: 827–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: Regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell, 2010, 141: 52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Quintero-Fabián S, Arreola R, Becerril-Villanueva E, et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis and cancer. Front Oncol, 2019, 9: 1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu Y, Aimetti A A, Langer R, et al. Bioresponsive materials. Nat Rev Mater, 2017, 2: 16075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huebsch N. Translational mechanobiology: Designing synthetic hydrogel matrices for improved in vitro models and cell-based therapies. Acta Biomater, 2019, 94: 97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Leight J L, Tokuda E Y, Jones C E, et al. Multifunctional bioscaffolds for 3D culture of melanoma cells reveal increased MMP activity and migration with BRAF kinase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112: 5366–5371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fonseca K B, Maia F R, Cruz F A, et al. Enzymatic, physicochemical and biological properties of MMP-sensitive alginate hydrogels. Soft Matter, 2013, 9: 3283–3292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fonseca K B, Bidarra S J, Oliveira M J, et al. Molecularly designed alginate hydrogels susceptible to local proteolysis as three-dimensional cellular microenvironments. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7: 1674–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt P, Zhou L, Tishinov K, et al. Dialdehydes lead to exceptionally fast bioconjugations at neutral pH by virtue of a cyclic intermediate. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 10928–10931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Even-Ram S, Artym V, Yamada K M. Matrix control of stem cell fate. Cell, 2006, 126: 645–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chau Y, Tan F E, Langer R. Synthesis and characterization of dextranpeptide-methotrexate conjugates for tumor targeting via mediation by matrix metalloproteinase II and matrix metalloproteinase IX. Bioconjugate Chem, 2004, 15: 931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Partridge C A, Phillips P G, Niedbala M J, et al. Localization and activation of type IV collagenase/gelatinase at endothelial focal contacts. Am J Physiol-Lung Cellular Mol Physiol, 1997, 272: L813–L822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tung C L, Wong C T T, Fung E Y M, et al. Traceless and chemoselective amine bioconjugation via phthalimidine formation in native protein modification. Org Lett, 2016, 18: 2600–2603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cheng Y, He C, Xiao C, et al. Versatile biofunctionalization of polypeptide-based thermosensitive hydrogels via click chemistry. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14: 468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ren K, He C, Xiao C, et al. Injectable glycopolypeptide hydrogels as biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2015, 51: 238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brown S, Bernardo M M, Li Z H, et al. Potent and selective mechanism-based inhibition of gelatinases. J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122: 6799–6800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hannocks M J, Zhang X, Gerwien H, et al. The gelatinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, as fine tuners of neuroinflammatory processes. Matrix Biol, 2019, 75–76: 102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130022, China

    Yan Rong, Zhen Zhang, ChaoLiang He & XueSi Chen

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yan Rong

  3. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China

    Zhen Zhang, ChaoLiang He & XueSi Chen

Authors
  1. Yan Rong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ChaoLiang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. XueSi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChaoLiang He.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51973218, 51622307, 21574127, 51520105004), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS.

Supporting Information

11431_2020_1731_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)/peptide hydrogels as an interactive platform conducive to cell proliferation during 3D cell culture

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rong, Y., Zhang, Z., He, C. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)/peptide hydrogels as an interactive platform conducive to cell proliferation during 3D cell culture. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 1285–1294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1731-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1731-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation