Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on the drag characteristics of supercritical water flow past a sphere

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical simulation has become a useful approach to explore the complex physical and chemical process inside the supercritical water (SCW) fluidized bed reactor. Due to the drastic and non-linear variation of water properties near pseudocritical point, the flow field and drag coefficient of SCW flow past a cold particle are considerably different from that of conventional flow. Therefore, in this work, particle-resolved numerical investigation is conducted to study the flow field and drag characteristics under the influence of the special water properties variation. Through varying the enthalpy corresponding to the particle surface temperature, which will be called the particle surface enthalpy for short, in a wide range, it realizes the study under different properties variation tendencies. The simulated results demonstrate that the variations of drag coefficient versus Reynolds number (Re) and particle surface enthalpy are in good regularity when taking the freestream temperature as reference temperature. The drag coefficient is enhanced greatly at high enthalpy difference between particle surface and inflow, and the enhancement is mainly contributed by that of the frictional drag coefficient. Moreover, the drag coefficient variations under different pressures are in good agreement when cases are set with the same inflow and particle surface enthalpies, respectively. By fitting the simulated results, a new drag coefficient correlation is developed for Re range of 10–200 with consideration of the influence of the special properties variation. The fitting quality is good that the maximum deviation between the new correlation and simulated data is 13.92%, and the mean deviation is 3.67%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo L, Jin H. Boiling coal in water: Hydrogen production and power generation system with zero net CO2 emission based on coal and supercritical water gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 12953–12967

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang D, Guo L, Zhao J, et al. Kinetics study for sodium transformation in supercritical water gasification of Zhundong coal. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 13869–13878

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bai B, Wang W, Jin H. Experimental study on gasification performance of polypropylene (PP) plastics in supercritical water. Energy, 2020, 191: 116527

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai B, Liu Y, Zhang H, et al. Experimental investigation on gasification characteristics of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics in supercritical water. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116630

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Li L, Xu P, et al. Hydrogen production through biomass gasification in supercritical water: A review from exergy aspect. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 15727–15736

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng Z, Jin H, Chen J, et al. Numerical study on flow dynamics characteristics of supercritical water transporting particles under transcritical temperature conditions driven by pressure difference. Powder Tech, 2020, 363: 676–686

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ren C, Jin H, Ren Z, et al. Simulation of solid-fluid interaction in a supercritical water fluidized bed with a cold jet. Powder Tech, 2020, 363: 687–698

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhong H, Xiong Q, Zhu Y, et al. CFD modeling of the effects of particle shrinkage and intra-particle heat conduction on biomass fast pyrolysis. Renew Energy, 2019, 141: 236–245

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meng Z, Liu M, Ahmad N, et al. Hydrodynamics in commercial-scale internally circulating fluidized beds with different central downcomer outlets. Particuology, 2020, 51: 120–131

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong Q, Kong S C. High-resolution particle-scale simulation of biomass pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2016, 4: 5456–5461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumura Y, Minowa T. Fundamental design of a continuous biomass gasification process using a supercritical water fluidized bed. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29: 701–707

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jin H, Wang H, Wu Z, et al. Numerical investigation of the effect of surface roughness on flow and heat transfer characteristics of single sphere particle in supercritical water. Comput Math Appl, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.10.011

  13. Ou Z, Jin H, Ren Z, et al. Mathematical model for coal conversion in supercritical water: Reacting multiphase flow with conjugate heat transfer. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 15746–15757

    Google Scholar 

  14. Su X, Jin H, Guo S, et al. Numerical study on biomass model compound gasification in a supercritical water fluidized bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci, 2015, 134: 737–745

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Zhang T, Dong X. Bed to wall heat transfer in supercritical water fluidized bed: Comparison with the gas-solid fluidized bed. Appl Thermal Eng, 2015, 88: 297–305

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang T, Lu Y, Yao L. Experimental study ofwall-to-bed heattransfer in a supercritical water fluidized bed. Int J Multiphase Flow, 2018, 109: 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potic B, Kersten S R A, Ye M, et al. Fluidization with hot compressed water in micro-reactors. Chem Eng Sci, 2005, 60: 5982–5990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lu Y, Wei L, Wei J. A numerical study of bed expansion in supercritical water fluidized bed with a non-spherical particle drag model. Chem Eng Res Des, 2015, 104: 164–173

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Y, Huang J, Zheng P. A CFD-DEM study of bubble dynamics in fluidized bed using flood fill method. Chem Eng J, 2015, 274: 123–131

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H, Lu Y. A computational particle fluid-dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in a three-dimensional full-loop circulating fluidized bed: Effects of particle-size distribution. Particuology, 2020, 49: 134–145

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jin H, Wu Z, Guo L, et al. Numerical investigation on the two phase flow behaviors in supercritical water fluidized bed with swirling flow distributor. Heat Transfer Eng, 2018, 39: 1593–1604

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fan C, Guo S, Jin H. Numerical study on coal gasification in supercritical water fluidized bed and exploration of complete gasification under mild temperature conditions. Chem Eng Sci, 2019, 206: 134–145

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wei L, Lu Y, Wei J. Flow separation from a spherical particle in supercritical water. Chem Eng Res Des, 2014, 92: 2273–2282

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Xiong B, An X, et al. Numerical investigation on the effect of the incident angle on momentum and heat transfer of spheroids in supercritical water. Comput Fluids, 2019, 179: 533–542

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang H, Xiong B, An X, et al. Prediction on drag force and heat transfer of spheroids in supercritical water: A PR-DNS study. Powder Tech, 2019, 342: 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Xiong B, An X, et al. Numerical prediction on the drag force and heat transfer of non-spherical particles in supercritical water. Powder Tech, 2020, 361: 414–423

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu Z, Ou G, Ren Y, et al. Particle-resolved numerical study of the forced convection heat transfer characteristics of an endothermicbiomass particle placed in supercritical water crossflow. Renew Energy, 2020, 158: 271–279

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Z, Ren Y, Ou G, et al. Influence of special water properties variation on the heat transfer of supercritical water flow around a sphere. Chem Eng Sci, 2020, 222: 115698

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Q X, Chen G F, Yang Z Q, et al. Numerical investigation on gas flow heat transfer and pressure drop in the shell side of spiral-wound heat exchangers. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 506–515

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu M S, Yang X L, Long X P, et al. Numerical investigation of turbulent flow coherent structures in annular jet pumps using the LES method. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 86–97

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao J Y, Xi G, Wang Z H, et al. Investigation of the spike-stall warning method using the blade passing signal. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 830–842

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xiong B, Zhang H, An X. Boundary effects on the drag coefficient and average Nusselt number of a sphere in SCW: A comparative study. Eng Anal Bound Elem, 2019, 102: 1–10

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wittig K, Nikrityuk P, Richter A. Drag coefficient and Nusselt number for porous particles under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2017, 112: 1005–1016

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dhole S D, Chhabra R P, Eswaran V. A numerical study on the forced convection heat transfer from an isothermal and isoflux sphere in the steady symmetric flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2006, 49: 984–994

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Whitaker S. Forced convection heat transfer correlations for flow in pipes, past flat plates, single cylinders, single spheres, and for flow in packed beds and tube bundles. AIChE J, 1972, 18: 361–371

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ranz W E, Marshall W R. Evaporation from drops. Chem Eng Prog, 1952, 48: 173–180

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clift R, Grace J R, Weber M E. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles. New York: Academic Press, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haider A, Levenspiel O. Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Tech, 1989, 58: 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  39. Richter A, Nikrityuk P A. Drag forces and heat transfer coefficients for spherical, cuboidal and ellipsoidal particles in cross flow at sub-critical Reynolds numbers. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2012, 55: 1343–1354

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Hao X, Xu P, Suo H, et al. Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer of supercritical water in the water-cooled wall tube. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2020, 148: 119084

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jin Y, Li Z, Yuan N, et al. Flow and heat transfer ofsupercritical water in a rifled tube with axially non-uniform heating. Appl Thermal Eng, 2020, 169: 114923

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ellendt N, Lumanglas A M, Moqadam S I, et al. A model for the drag and heat transfer of spheres in the laminar regime at high temperature differences. Int J Thermal Sci, 2018, 133: 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  43. Almedeij J. Drag coefficient of flow around a sphere: Matching asymptotically the wide trend. Powder Tech, 2008, 186: 218–223

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yow H N, Pitt M J, Salman A D. Drag correlations for particles of regular shape. Adv Powder Tech, 2005, 16: 363–372

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Jin.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51922086) and the China National Key Research and Development Plan Project (Grant No. 2016YFB0600100).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Ou, G., Ren, Y. et al. Numerical investigation on the drag characteristics of supercritical water flow past a sphere. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 1509–1519 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1684-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1684-2

Keywords

Navigation