Skip to main content
Log in

Radiative heat transfer and thermal characteristics of Fe-based oxides coated SiC and Alumina RPC structures as integrated solar thermochemical reactor

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigated radiative heat transfer and thermal characteristics of Fe-based oxides coated SiC and Alumina reticulated porous ceramic structures as integrated solar thermochemical reactor. High-flux solar radiation absorption and axial temperature distribution in the ceramic foams reactor were analyzed by adopting surface-to-surface radiation model coupled to the P1 approximation for radiation heat transfer. The radiative heat transfer and thermal characteristics of different foam-type RPC structures, including SiC, CeO2, FeAl2O4, NiFeAlO4, Fe3O4/SiC, and NiFe2O4/SiC were evaluated. The mass flow rate and foam structural parameters, including the permeability, pore mean cell size, and extinction coefficients have significantly affected the axial temperature distribution, pressure drop, heat transfer, and fluid flow. Integrated porous structure to the solar receiver could maximize the incorporation of redox powder in the reacting medium, lower the pressure drop, and enhance the thermal performance of the thermochemical reacting system. SiC structure was the candidate materials in the case where more heat flux and high axial temperature distribution is needed. However, Fe-based oxide coated Al2O3 structure could be considered regarding the heat transfer enhancement along with the catalyst activity of oxygen carriers for solar thermochemical reacting system performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buelens L C, Galvita V V, Poelman H, et al. Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO2 utilization via Le Chateliers principle. Science, 2016, 354: 449–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kubicek M, Bork A H, Rupp J L M. Perovskite oxides—a review on a versatile material class for solar-to-fuel conversion processes. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 11983–12000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jang Y J, Jang J W, Lee J, et al. Selective CO production by Au coupled ZnTe/ZnO in the photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction system. Energy Environ Sci, 2015, 8: 3597–3604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo L J, Jin H, Ge Z W, et al. Industrialization prospects for hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water and novel thermodynamic cycle power generation system with no pollution emission. Sci China Technol Sci, 2015, 58: 1989–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis N S. Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science, 2016, 351: aad1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiao F, Li J, Pan X, et al. Selective conversion of syngas to light olefins. Science, 2016, 351: 1065–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hildebrandt D, Glasser D, Hausberger B, et al. Chemistry: Producing transportation fuels with less work. Science, 2009, 323: 1680–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asif M, Gao X, Lv H, et al. Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 from 600 MW supercritical coal power plant to produce methanol: A technoeconomic analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 2726–2741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Johnson T A, Miller J E, et al. Fuel production from CO2 using solar-thermal energy: System level analysis. Energy Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 8417–8429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan W, Liu D. Coupled chemical effects of carbon dioxide and hydrogen additions on premixed lean dimethyl ether flames. Sci China Technol Sci, 2017, 60: 102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valades-Pelayo P J, Villafán-Vidales H I, Romero-Paredes H, et al. Modeling of a tubular solar reactor for continuous reduction of CeO2: The effect of particle size and loading on radiative heat transfer and conversion. Chem Eng Sci, 2017, 162: 77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang H, Hao Y, Kong H. Thermodynamic study on solar thermochemical fuel production with oxygen permeation membrane reactors. Int J Energy Res, 2015, 39: 1790–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang J, Haribal V, Li F. Perovskite nanocomposites as effective CO2-splitting agents in a cyclic redox scheme. Sci Adv, 2017, 3: e1701184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wheeler V M, Bader R, Kreider P B, et al. Modelling of solar thermochemical reaction systems. Sol Energy, 2017, 156: 149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller J E, Ambrosini A, Coker E N, et al. Advancing oxide materials for thermochemical production of solar fuels. Energy Procedia, 2014, 49: 2019–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu A P, Dong W J. Highlights on inorganic solid state chemistry and energy materials. Sci China Technol Sci, 2012, 55: 3248–3252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Villafán-Vidales H I, Arancibia-Bulnes C A, Riveros-Rosas D, et al. An overview of the solar thermochemical processes for hydrogen and syngas production: Reactors, and facilities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 75: 894–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Valades-Pelayo P J, Romero-Paredes H, Arancibia-Bulnes C A, et al. Geometric optimization of a solar cubic-cavity multi-tubular thermochemical reactor using a Monte Carlo-finite element radiative transfer model. Appl Thermal Eng, 2016, 98: 575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng Z J, Xu Y, He Y L. Thermal analysis of a solar parabolic trough receiver tube with porous insert optimized by coupling genetic algorithm and CFD. Sci China Technol Sci, 2016, 59: 1475–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ackermann S, Scheffe J R, Duss J, et al. Morphological characterization and effective thermal conductivity of dual-scale reticulated porous structures. Materials, 2014, 7: 7173–7195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bala Chandran R, De Smith R M, Davidson J H. Model of an integrated solar thermochemical reactor/reticulated ceramic foam heat exchanger for gas-phase heat recovery. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2015, 81: 404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Agrafiotis C, Becker A, Roeb M, et al. An overview of the solar thermochemical processes for hydrogen and syngas production: Reactors, and facilities. Sol Energy, 2016, 139: 676–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buck R, Muir J F, Hogan R E. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane in a solar volumetric receiver/reactor: The CAESAR project. Sol Energy Mater, 1991, 24: 449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buck R, Abele M, Bauer H, et al. Development of a volumetric receiver- reactor for solar methane reforming. ASME J Solar Energy Eng, 1994, 116: 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wörner A, Tamme R. CO2 reforming of methane in a solar driven volumetric receiver-reactor. Catal Today, 1998, 46: 165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Agrafiotis C, Tescari S, Roeb M, et al. Exploitation of thermochemical cycles based on solid oxide redox systems for thermochemical storage of solar heat. Part 3: Cobalt oxide monolithic porous structures as integrated thermochemical reactors/heat exchangers. Sol Energy, 2015, 114: 459–475

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liang X, Li Y, Sang S, et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of SiC reticulated porous ceramics via adjustment of residual stress within the strut. Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 2018, 15: 28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rannabauer S, Söffker G M, Scheunemann M, et al. Increased mechanical stability and thermal conductivity of alumina reticulated porous ceramics (RPC) by nanoparticle infiltration processing. Adv Eng Mater, 2017, 19: 1700211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banerjee A, Bala Chandran R, Davidson J H. Experimental investigation of a reticulated porous alumina heat exchanger for high temperature gas heat recovery. Appl Thermal Eng, 2015, 75: 889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei Q, Yang G, Yoneyama Y, et al. Designing a novel Ni-Al2O3-SiC catalyst with a stereo structure for the combined methane conversion process to effectively produce syngas. Catal Today, 2016, 265: 36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wei Q, Yang G, Gao X, et al. Ni/Silicalite-1 coating being coated on SiC foam: a tailor-made monolith catalyst for syngas production using a combined methane reforming process. Chem Eng J, 2017, 327: 465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen X, Xia X L, Yan X W, et al. Heat transfer analysis of a volumetric solar receiver with composite porous structure. Energy Convers Manage, 2017, 136: 262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Du S, Li M J, Ren Q, et al. Pore-scale numerical simulation of fully coupled heat transfer process in porous volumetric solar receiver. Energy, 2017, 140: 1267–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guene Lougou B, Shuai Y, Chaffa G, et al. Analysis of CO2 utilization into synthesis gas based on solar thermochemical CH4-reforming. J Energy Chem, 2018, in press

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Wang F, Han Y, et al. Thermochemical storage analysis of the dry reforming of methane in foam solar reactor. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 158: 489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Welte M, Warren K, Scheffe J R, et al. Combined Ceria reduction and methane reforming in a solar-driven particle-transport reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2017, 56: 10300–10308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Furler P, Scheffe J R, Steinfeld A. Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO2 via ceria redox reactions in a high-temperature solar reactor. Energy Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 6098–6103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Z, Jiang Q, Tong J, et al. Enhancement effects of dopants and SiO2 support on mixed metal ferrites based two-step thermochemical water splitting. Sol Energy, 2017, 144: 643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin F, Chu P K, Tong H, et al. Improvement of surface porosity and properties of alumina films by incorporation of Fe micrograins in micro-arc oxidation. Appl Surf Sci, 2006, 253: 863–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guene Lougou B, Shuai Y, Guohua Z, et al. Analysis of H2 and CO production via solar thermochemical reacting system of NiFe2O4 redox cycles combined with CH4 partial oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 5996–6010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guene Lougou B, Hong J, Shuai Y, et al. Production mechanism analysis of H2 and CO via solar thermochemical cycles based on iron oxide (Fe3O4) at high temperature. Sol Energy, 2017, 148: 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bachirou G L, Shuai Y, Zhang J, et al. Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO2 via iron oxide (Fe3O4) redox reactions under high-pressure. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 19936–19946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Block T, Schmücker M. Metal oxides for thermochemical energy storage: A comparison of several metal oxide systems. Sol Energy, 2016, 126: 195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuo Y L, Huang W C, Hsu W M, et al. Use of spinel nickel aluminium ferrite as self-supported oxygen carrier for chemical looping hydrogen generation process. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 2015, 15: 2700–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao D, Luo F, Zhou W, et al. Microwave absorption properties and complex permittivity of Fe/FeAl2O4 coatings deposited by reactive plasma spraying Al/Fe2O3 powders. Surf Coatings Tech, 2011, 205: 4254–4259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J Y C, Miller J T, Gerken J B, et al. Inverse spinel NiFeAlO4 as a highly active oxygen evolution electrocatalyst: promotion of activity by a redox-inert metal ion. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 1382–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Guene Lougou B, Shuai Y, Xing H, et al. Thermal performance analysis of solar thermochemical reactor for syngas production. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2017, 111: 410–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Guene Lougou B, Shuai Y, Chen X, et al. Analysis of radiation heat transfer and temperature distributions of solar thermochemical reactor for syngas production. Front Energy, 2017, 11: 480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu Z, Caliot C, Flamant G, et al. Coupled radiation and flow modeling in ceramic foam volumetric solar air receivers. Sol Energy, 2011, 85: 2374–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tang Q X, Chen G F, Yang Z Q, et al. Numerical investigation on gas flow heat transfer and pressure drop in the shell side of spiral-wound heat exchangers. Sci China Technol Sci, 2018, 61: 506–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Shuai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guene Lougou, B., Shuai, Y., Pan, R. et al. Radiative heat transfer and thermal characteristics of Fe-based oxides coated SiC and Alumina RPC structures as integrated solar thermochemical reactor. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 61, 1788–1801 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9294-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9294-y

Keywords

Navigation