Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Avian contrast sensitivity inspired contour detector for unmanned aerial vehicle landing

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Runway detection is a demanding task for autonomous landing of unmanned aerial vehicles. Inspired by the attenuation effect and surround suppression mechanism, a novel biologically computational method based on the avian contrast sensitivity is proposed for runway contour detection. For the noisy stimuli, deniosed responses of the biologically inspired Gabor energy operator are generalized followed by the denoising layer and the multiresolution fusion layer. Moreover, two factors such as contour effect and texture suppression are considered in the contrast sensitivity based surround inhibition. Different from traditional detectors, which do not distinguish between contours and texture edges, the proposed method can respond strongly to contours and suppress the texture information. Applying the contrast sensitivity inspired detector to noisy runway scenes yields effective contours, while the non-meaningful texture elements are removed dramatically at the same time. Besides the superior performance over traditional detectors, the proposed method is capable to provide insight into the attenuation effect of the avian contrast sensitivity function and has potential applications in computer vision and pattern recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duan H B, Liu S Q. Unmanned air/ground vehicles heterogeneous cooperative techniques: Current status and prospects. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 1349–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kong W W, Zhang D B, Wang X, et al. Autonomous landing of an UAV with a ground-based actuated infrared stereo vision system. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Tokyo, 2013. 2963–2970

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X C, Wang H, Fu D, et al. An area-based position and attitude estimation for unmanned aerial vehicle navigation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 916–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketcham M, Ganokratanaa T. The analysis of lane detection algorithms using histogram shapes and Hough transform. Int J Intell Comp Cybern, 2015, 8: 262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Han P, Cheng Z, Chang L. Automatic runway detection based on unsupervised classification in polsar image. In: Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance. Herndon, 2016. 6E3-1-6E3-8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bai X W, Han Y, Wu D, et al. The automatic detection method for airport runway. In: International Congress on Image and Signal Processing. Shenyang, 2015. 1015–1019

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abu-Jbara K, Alheadary W, Sundaramorthi G, et al. A robust vision- based runway detection and tracking algorithm for automatic UAV landing. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Denver, 2015. 1148–1157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas N, Mathew J J, James A. Threshold logic based low-level vision sparse object features. Int J Intell Comp Cybern, 2016, 9: 314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kruger N, Janssen P, Kalkan S, et al. Deep hierarchies in the primate visual cortex: What can we learn for computer vision? IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2013, 35: 1847–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harmening W M, Wagner H. From optics to attention: Visual perception in barn owls. J Comp Physiol A, 2011, 197: 1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duan H, Deng Y, Wang X, et al. Small and dim target detection via lateral inhibition filtering and artificial bee colony based selective visual attention. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e72035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duan H, Deng Y, Wang X, et al. Biological eagle-eye-based visual imaging guidance simulation platform for unmanned flying vehicles. IEEE Aero El Sys Mag, 2013, 28: 36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reymond L, Wolfe J. Behavioural determination of the contrast sensitivity function of the eagle aquila audax. Vision Res, 1981, 21: 263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch J. Falcon visual sensitivity to grating contrast. Nature, 1982, 300: 57–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uhlrich D J, Essock E A, Lehmkuhle S. Cross-species correspondence of spatial contrast sensitivity functions. Behav Brain Res, 1981, 2: 291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghim M M, Hodos W. Spatial contrast sensitivity of birds. J Comp Physiol A, 2006, 192: 523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harmening W M, Nikolay P, Orlowski J, et al. Spatial contrast sensitivity and grating acuity of barn owls. J Vision, 2009, 9: 13–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olshausen B A, Field D J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 1996, 381: 607–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 1986, PAMI-8: 679–698

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee T S. Image representation using 2D Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 1996, 18: 959–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Petkov N, Westenberg M A. Suppression of contour perception by band-limited noise and its relation to nonclassical receptive field inhibition. Biol Cybern, 2003, 88: 236–246

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Grigorescu C, Petkov N, Westenberg M A. Contour detection based on nonclassical receptive field inhibition. IEEE T Image Process, 2003, 12: 729–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Irvin G E, Casagrande V A, Norton T T. Center/surround relationships of magnocellular, parvocellular, and koniocellular relay cells in primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Visual Neurosci, 1993, 10: 363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hubel D H. Exploration of the primary visual cortex, 1955–78. Nature, 1982, 299: 515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindeberg T. A computational theory of visual receptive fields. Biol Cybern, 2013, 107: 589–635

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Adelson E H, Bergen J R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A, 1985, 2: 284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Manahilov V, Simpson W. Energy model for contrast detection: Spatiotemporal characteristics of threshold vision. Biol Cybern, 1999, 81: 61–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Freeman J, Ziemba C M, Heeger D J, et al. A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates. Nat Neurosci, 2013, 16: 974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci, 1999, 2: 1019–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Welling M, Gehler P V. Products of “Edge-perts”. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, 2005. 419–426

    Google Scholar 

  31. Papari G, Campisi P, Petkov N, et al. Contour detection by multiresolution surround inhibition. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Atlanta, 2006. 749–752

    Google Scholar 

  32. Haralick R M, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1973, SMC-3: 610–621

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mallat S G. Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process, 1989, 37: 2091–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petkov N, Subramanian E. Motion detection, noise reduction, texture suppression, and contour enhancement by spatiotemporal Gabor filters with surround inhibition. Biol Cybern, 2007, 97: 423–439

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu Z S, Su A, Liu H B, et al. Vision navigation for aircrafts based on 3D reconstruction from real-time image sequences. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1196–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li H, Duan H B. Verification of monocular and binocular pose estimation algorithms in vision-based UAVs autonomous aerial refueling system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1730–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun C H, Duan H B. Markov decision evolutionary game theoretic learning for cooperative sensing of unmanned aerial vehicles. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1392–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Duda R O, Hart P E. Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun Acm, 1972, 15: 11–15

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    YiMin Deng & HaiBin Duan

Authors
  1. YiMin Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. HaiBin Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HaiBin Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, Y., Duan, H. Avian contrast sensitivity inspired contour detector for unmanned aerial vehicle landing. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 1958–1965 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-9019-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-9019-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation