Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical analysis of one Chinese sun-synchronous satellite anomalies

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the data from the Medium-Energy Proton and Electron Detector (MEPED) onboard NOAA-17, 141 anomalies of a Chinese Sun-Synchronous satellite (SSO-X) that occurred between 02/01/2010 and 09/31/2012 were studied statistically. About 26 out of the 52 anomalies that occurred outside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) were accompanied by energetic electron storms. Superposed Epoch Analysis (SEA) was used to analyze the properties of the anomalies and the dynamics of the space environments during these 26 events. Then, a Monte Carlo method was utilized to simulate the electron deposition and the interactions of the injected electrons with an aluminum shield and polyethylene dielectric. The average, median, and 75th percentile values of the maximum electric field strength inside the dielectric were calculated. The results showed the following. (1) SSO-X anomalies are more likely to occur within the SAA, as 89 out of 141 anomalies (63%) occurred there. (2) Twenty-six of the anomalies that occurred outside the SAA during energetic electron storms were located near the outer boundaries of the outer radiation belts, and these were more frequent in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere. (3) Electron flux enhancements occurred around the failure time at all energy levels but were more profound in the lower energy channels. The maximum fluxes of electrons >30 keV, >100 keV, and >300 keV were 106, 3.5×105, and 1.2×106 cm-2 s-1 sr-1, respectively. (4) The average, median, and 75th percentile values of the maximum electric field strengths inside the dielectric for the aforementioned 26 events remained in the range from 106 to 107 V/m for long time periods, which suggests that the ‘potential hazards’ of internal discharges cause SSO-X anomalies. The above results can provide useful information for the design and protection of sun-synchronous spacecraft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lauriente M, Vampola A L, Koga R, et al. Analysis of spacecraft anomalies due to the radiation environment. J Spacecraft Rockets, 1999, 36: 902–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedingfield K L, Leach R D, Alexander M B. Spacecraft system failures and anomalies attributed to the natural space environment. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vette J I. The AE-8 trapped electron model environment. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 1991, 92: 24228

  4. Sawyer D M, Vette J I. AP-8 trapped proton environment for solar maximum and solar minimum. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 1976, 77: 18983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao F, Su Z, Zheng H, et al. Three-dimensional simulations of outer radiation belt electron dynamics including cross-diffusion terms. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2010, 115, A05216

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao F, Su Z, Zheng H, et al. Modeling of outer radiation belt electrons by multidimensional diffusion process. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2009, 114, doi: 10.1029/2008JA013580

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choi H S, Lee J, Cho K S, et al. Analysis of GEO spacecraft anomalies: Space weather relationships. Space Weather, 2011, 9: 755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farthing W H, Brown J P, Bryant W C. Differential spacecraft charging on the geostationary operational satellites. NASA Technical Memorandum 83908, 1982, 43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao H T, Zhang Y T. Statistical analysis of DFH-3 serial satellites failure (in Chinese). Spacecraft Eng, 2007, 16: 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang S, Shi J, Wang J L. Satellite on-board failure statistics and analysis (in Chinese). Spacecraft Eng, 2010, 4: 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tian T, Zong Q G, Wang Y F, et al. Statistical study of the properties of the magnetic field and plasma in the earth’s magnetotail near lunar orbit. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 2570–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilie R, Liemohn M W, Thomsen M F, et al. Influence of epoch time selection on the results of superposed epoch analysis using ACE and MPA data. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A00A14

  13. Inguimbert C, Bourdarie S, Falguere D, et al. Anomalies of the ADSP 21060 onboard the DEMETER satellite. IEEE T Nucl Sci, 2013, 60: 4067–4073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boatella C, Hubert G, Ecoffet R, et al. ICARE on-board SAC-C: more than 8 years of SEU and MCU, analysis and prediction. IEEE T Nucl Sci, 2010, 57: 2000–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Falguere D, Boscher D, Nuns T, et al. In-flight observations of the radiation environment and its effects on devices in the SAC-C polar orbit. IEEE T Nucl Sci, 2002, 49: 2782–2787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reno Harboe-Sørensen. 40 years of radiation single event effects at the European space agency, ESTEC. IEEE T Nucl Sci, 2013, 60: 1816–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J S, Lu J Y. Space Weather (in Chinese). Beijing: Meteorology Press, 2010. 69

  18. Horne R B, Glauert S A, Meredith N P. Space weather impacts on satellites and forecasting the Earth’s electron radiation belts with spacecast. Space Weather, 2013,11: 169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iucci N, Levitin A E, Belov A V, et al. Space weather conditions and spacecraft anomalies in different orbits. Space Weather, 2005, 3, S01001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryden K A, Morris P A, Ford K A, et al. Observations of internal charging currents in medium earth orbit. IEEE T Plasma Sci, 2008, 36: 2473–2481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson P C. A survey of surface charging events on the DMSP spacecraft in LEO. Spacecraft Charging Technol, 2001, 476: 331

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson P C, Hanson W B. Spacecraft charging hazards in low Earth orbit. In: Proceedings of the 9th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson P C. Characteristics of spacecraft charging in low Earth orbit. J Geophys Res: Space Phys, 2012, 117, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016875

    Google Scholar 

  24. NASA. Mitigating in-space charging effects–A guideline. NASAHDBK-4002A. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, et al. GEANT4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Meth A, 2003, 506: 250–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gao B R, Hao Y Q, Jiao W X. A Study on spacecraft internal charging with Monte Carlo method (in Chinese). Chin J Space Sci, 2004, 24: 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tian T. The research on simulation and modeling of spacecraft internal charging (in Chinese). Dissertation of Master Degree. Beijing: Peking University, 2008. 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hao Y Q. Near-earth space electromagnetic environment monitoring and research (in Chinese). Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Beijing: Peking University, 2006. 60–61

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jiao W X, Pu Z Y. The physical mechanism of spacecraft internal charging (in Chinese). Sci Sin Ser A, 2000, 30: 136–139

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garrett H B, Whittlesey A C. Spacecraft charging, an update. IEEE T Plasma Sci, 2000, 28: 2017–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sorensen J, Rodgers D J, Ryden K A, et al. ESA’s tools for internal charging. Radiation and its effects on components and systems, 1999. RADECS 99. In: 1999 Fifth European Conference on IEEE, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 1999. 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fowler J F. X-ray induced conductivity in insulating materials. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat, 1956, 236: 464–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hao Y Q, Jiao W X, Chen H F. A Monte Carlo study on internal charging of on board subsystem during the July 2004 energetic electron event (in Chinese). Prog Geophys, 2009, 24: 1937–1942

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fennell J F, Koons H, Chen M W, et al. Internal Charging: A preliminary environmental specification for satellites. IEEE T Plasma Sci, 2000, 28: 2029–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin X G. Research on numerical simulation and application of deep dielectric charging effect (in Chinese). Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2010. 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rodgers D J, Ryden K A, Latham P M, et al. Engineering tools for internal charging. ESA Contract Final Report, DER/CIS (CIS2)/7/36/2/4/FINAL, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wrenn G L. Chronology of ‘killer’ electrons: Solar cycles 22 and 23. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy, 2009, 71: 1210–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan C, Zong Q. Relativistic electron fluxes dropout in the outer radiation belt under different solar wind conditions. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2013, 118: 7545–7556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to QiuGang Zong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, T., Zong, Q., Chang, Z. et al. Statistical analysis of one Chinese sun-synchronous satellite anomalies. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59, 540–546 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5917-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5917-x

Keywords

Navigation