Skip to main content
Log in

High-efficiency magnetophoretic separation based on synergy of magnetic force field and flow field in microchannels

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetophoresis is one of the most important separation methods in biological and chemical engineering. In this paper, a novel impact parameter on separation efficiency, i.e., the angle between the vectors of magnetic force and fluid velocity, was derived from the basic equation describing the motion of magnetic beads in microchannels. It is proposed that one of the most important approaches for separation efficiency enhancement is to improve the coordination of magnetic force field and fluid flow field. A T-shaped microchannel magnetophoretic separator was designed based on the angle. And then a two-dimensional dynamic model of magnetic beads moving in microchannels was established to study the separation efficiency of T-shaped microseparator by combined use of finite element method and Runge-Kutta method. The results show that the capture efficiency of T-shaped microseparator is much higher than that of the straight microseparator at the same conditions. For small magnetic beads at high fluid velocities, the designed T-shaped microseparator could still keep high separation efficiency whereas the conventional straight microseparator fails to separate the magnetic beads. Further analysis shows that the mechanism of separation efficiency enhancement lies in the synergy of magnetic force field and flow field, which directly leads to large deflected velocity of the magnetic beads from the main stream, and thus increasing the separation efficiency. It is anticipated that the results in this paper are theoretically helpful for the optimum design of highly efficient magnetophoretic separators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B :

total magnetic flux density, T

B 0 :

external magnetic flux density, T

B 1 :

magnetic flux density generated by soft magnets, T

d p :

diameter of the magnetic bead, μm

e R :

relative error

f D :

wall drag multiplier

F d :

drag force, N

F m :

magnetic force, N

h 1 :

width of main channel, μm

h 2 :

width of bifurcates, μm

h 3 :

length of each soft magnet, μm

H :

total magnetic field intensity, A m−1

H 1 :

magnetic field intensity generated by soft magnets, A m−1

L 1 :

length of computation domain, mm

L 2 :

width of computation domain, mm

L e :

width of each soft magnet, μm

L s :

space between two neighboring soft magnets, μm

M es :

saturated magnetization of the soft magnet, A m−1

M ps :

saturated magnetization of the magnetic bead, A m−1

P f :

pressure, Pa

R p :

radius of the magnetic bead, μm

R :

vector position of the magnetic bead, m

s :

distance between the magnetic bead and the microchannel wall, m

SE :

separation efficiency

t :

time, s

t 0 :

residential time, s

U :

average fluid velocity in the microchannel, m s−1

u f :

fluid velocity vector, m s−1

u p :

velocity vector of the magnetic bead, m s−1

u py :

y-component of the magnetic bead velocity, m s−1

V p :

volume of the magnetic bead, m3

Δy :

deflection, m

η f :

dynamic viscosity, Pa s

θ :

synergy angle

μ 0 :

permeability of vacuum, N A−2

ρ f :

fluid density, kg m−3

ϕ 1 :

magnetic potential, A

χ eff :

effective magnetic susceptibility of the magnetic bead

References

  1. Pamme N. Magnetism and microfluidics. Lab Chip, 2006, 6: 24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gijs M. Magnetic bead handling on-chip: New opportunities for analytical applications. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2004, 1(1): 22–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lim J K, Lanni C, Evarts E R, et al. Magnetophoresis of Nanoparticles. ACS NANO, 2011, 5(1): 217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teste B, Malloggi F, Gassner A L, et al. Magnetic core shell nanoparticles trapping in a microdevice generating high magnetic gradient. Lab Chip, 2011, 11: 833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bu M Q, Christensen T B, Smistrup K, et al. Characterization of a microfluidic magnetic bead separator for high-throughput applications. Sens Actuators A, 2008, 145–146: 430–436

    Google Scholar 

  6. Choi J W, Oh K W, Thomas J H, et al. An integrated microfluidic biochemical detection system for protein analysis with magnetic bead-based sampling capabilities. Lab Chip, 2002, 2: 27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smistrup K, Hansen O, Bruus H, et al. Magnetic separation in microfluidic systems using microfabricated electromagnets-experiments and simulations. J Magn Magn Mater, 2005, 293(1): 597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramadan Q, Samper V, Poenar D, et al. Magnetic-based microfluidic platform for biomolecular separation. Biomed Microdevices, 2006, 8(2): 151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo S, Zuo C, Huang W, et al. Response of super-paramagnetic beads in microfluidic devices with integrated magnetic microcolumns. Microelectron Eng, 2006, 83(4–9): 1655–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Chen X, Cao H, et al. Study of a Novel Microfluidic DNA Extraction Chip. Micronanoelectron Tech, 2007, 9: 853–857

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xia N, Hunt T P, Mayers B T, et al. Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow. Biomed Microdevices, 2006, 8: 299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Furlani E P. Analysis of particle transport in a magnetophoretic microsystem. J Appl Phys, 2006, 99: 024912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarn M D, Peyman S A, Robert D, et al. The importance of particle type selection and temperature control for on-chip free-flow magnetophoresis. J Magn Magn Mater, 2009, 321: 4115–4122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drogoff B L, Clime L, Veres T. The influence of magnetic carrier size on the performance of microfluidic integrated micro-electromagnetic traps. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2008, 5: 373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H T, Kaminski M D, Ebner A D, et al. Theoretical analysis of a simple yet efficient portable magnetic separator design for separation of magnetic nano/micro-carriers from human blood flow. J Magn Magn Mater, 2007, 313: 127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nandy K, Chaudhuri S, Ganguly R, et al. Analytical model for the magnetophoretic capture of magnetic microspheres in microfluidic devices. J Magn Magn Mater, 2008, 320: 1398–1405

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sinha A, Ganguly R, De K A, et al. Single magnetic particle dynamics in a microchannel. Phys Fluids, 2007, 19(117102): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee Y F, Lien K Y, Lei H Y, et al. An integrated microfluidic system for rapid diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Biosens Bioelectronics, 2009, 25(4): 745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki H, Ho C, Kasagi N. A chaotic mixer for magnetic bead-based micro cell sorter. J Microelectromech Syst, 2004, 13(5): 779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gijs M, Lacharme F, Lehmann U. Microfluidic applications of magnetic particles for biological analysis and catalysis. Chem Rev, 2010, 110(3): 1518–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo Z Y, Tao W Q, Shah R K. The field synergy (coordination) principle and its applications in enhancing single phase convective heat transfer. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, 48(9): 1797–180

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HuiYing Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, X., Wu, H. & Hu, D. High-efficiency magnetophoretic separation based on synergy of magnetic force field and flow field in microchannels. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 3311–3319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4593-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4593-8

Keywords

Navigation