Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative studies on the structure and adhesion of setae in G. gecko and G. swinhonis

  • Article
  • Published:
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histological techniques were used to observe and study the setae structures of two gecko species (G. gecko and G. swinhonis) and the relationships between these structures and the adhesive forces. The SEM results showed that the setae of these two species were densely distributed in an orderly fashion, and branched with curved tips. The setae of G. gecko had cluster structures, each cluster containing 4–6 setae whose terminal branches curved towards the center of the toes at ∼ 10°, the tips of the branches like spatulae and densely arrayed at an interval of less than 0.2–0.3 μm. On the contrary, the branch tips in the setae of G. swinhonis were curled, and the terminal parts of setae curved towards the center of the toes at various angles. Usually the setae of these gecko species branch twice at the top at intervals greater than that of G. gecko. The histological observation found that inside the setae of these two species there were plenty of unevenly distributed contents, such as epithelia, fat cells, pigmental cells and muscle tissue, but no gland cells existed. The results of functional experiments suggested that modifying the structure of gecko’s setae could reduce its adhesive ability dramatically, demonstrating the positive correlation between the structure of the gecko’s setae and its adhesive ability. The above results provide important information in designing bio-mimic setae and bio-gecko robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li L H. Application research information about special type robots in UK. Robots Inform (in Chinese), 1992, 3: 2342–2347

    Google Scholar 

  2. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405: 681–685, 10864324, 10.1038/35015073, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktlCgu7g%3D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, et al. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99(19): 12252–12256, 12198184, 10.1073/pnas.192252799, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntlCks7o%3D

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bundle M W, Dial K P. Mechanics of wing-assisted incline running (Wair). J Exp Biol, 2003, 206(24): 4553–4564, 14610039, 10.1242/jeb.00673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorb S N, Beutel R G., Gorb E V, et al. Structural design and biomechanics of friction-based releasable attachment devices in insects. Integr Comp Biol, 2002, 42(6): 1127–1139, 10.1093/icb/42.6.1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Desiraju G R. Chemistry beyond the molecule. Nature, 2001, 412(6845): 397–400, 11473302, 10.1038/35086640, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlslCruro%3D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gee H. Biomechanics-Gripping feat. Nature, 2000, 405(6787): 631–631, 10.1038/35015203, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktlCjurk%3D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Federle W, Endlein T. Locomotion and adhesion: Dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants. Arthropod Struct Dev, 2004, 33, 67–75, 10.1016/j.asd.2003.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaaf A, Damme R V, Herrel A, et al. Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of level and vertical locomotion in a ground-dwelling and a climbing gecko. J Exp Biol, 2001, 204(7): 1233–1246, 11249834, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjsVCktw%3D%3D

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaaf A, Damme R V. Limb proportions in climbing and grounddwelling geckos (Lepidpsauria, Gekkonidae): A phylogenetically informed analysis. Zoomorphology, 2001, 121(1): 45–53, 10.1007/s004350100044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaaf A, Herrel A, Aerts P, et al. Morphology and morphometrics of the appendicular musculature in geckoes (Lepidosauria) with different locomotor habits. Zoomorphology, 1999, 119(1): 9–22, 10.1007/s004350050077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J R, Guo C, Cheng H, et al. Comparison of the setae between the dung beetle Copris ochus and the gecko G. gecko and the effects of deformation on their functions. Acta Zool Sin (in Chinese), 2005, 51(4): 761–767

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng H, Sun J R, Li J Q, et al. Structure of the integumentary surface of the dung beetle Copris ochus Motschulsky and its relation to non-adherence of substrate particles. Acta Entomol Sin (in Chinese), 2002, 45(2): 175–181

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng H, Chen M S, Sun J R. Histological structure of the dung beetle Copris ochus Motschulsky integument. Acta Entomol Sin (in Chinese), 2003, 46(4): 429–435

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alibardi L. Ultrastructural autoradiographic and immunocytochemical analysis of setae formation and keratinization in the digital pads of the gecko Hemidactylus turcicus (Gekkonidae, Reptilia). Tissue Cell, 2003, 35: 288–296, 12921711, 10.1016/S0040-8166(03)00050-8, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szos1Ghtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sitti M, Fearing R S. Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2003, 18(7): 1055–1074, 10.1163/156856103322113788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sitti M, Fearing R S. Nanomolding based fabrication of synthetic gecko foot-hairs. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology. Washington DC, 2002. 26–28

  18. Geim A K, Dubonosl S V, Grigorieval I V, et al. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nature Materials, 2003, 2: 461–463, 12776092, 10.1038/nmat917, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXls1els7k%3D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guo Ce or Sun JiuRong.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.30400086, 30470230 and 60535020)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, C., Wang, W., Yu, M. et al. Comparative studies on the structure and adhesion of setae in G. gecko and G. swinhonis. SCI CHINA SER C 50, 831–838 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-007-0093-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-007-0093-2

Keywords

Navigation