Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning experience design with immersive virtual reality in physics education

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) simulations are argued to support students’ learning of complex scientific phenomena via the use of realistic graphics and interactions that students can hardly experience in everyday life. However, the integration of immersive VR simulations in science classrooms introduces new challenges, whilst there is a lack of learning designs to inform practice. As part of this study, we firstly present a learning experience (LX) design seeking to introduce an immersive VR simulation in Physics classrooms to support high-school students’ understanding of the Special Theory of Relativity. Then, we present an empirical investigation on the enactment and evaluation of the proposed LX design, with 109 high-school students (10–11th graders). A mixed-method approach was adopted to evaluate students’ conceptual learning gains along with their perceptions of the learning experience, encompassing the immersive VR simulation and the inquiry-based learning process adopted. We reflect on our LX design aimed at the integration of an immersive VR simulation in an inquiry-based learning environment and we highlight questions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from Tsivitanidou et al. (2021)

Fig. 2

Reproduced with permission from Tsivitanidou et al. (2021)

Fig. 3

Reproduced with permission from Tsivitanidou et al. (2021)

Fig. 4

Reproduced with permission from Tsivitanidou et al. (2021)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allcoat, D., & von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26.

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriassecq, I., & Greca, I. M. (2012). A teaching–learning sequence for the special relativity theory at high school level historically and epistemologically contextualized. Science & Education, 21(6), 827–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., & Johnson, C. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Learning through a technology-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, M., Christian, W., & Dancy, M. H. (2004). Teaching special relativity using Physlets®. The Physics Teacher, 42(5), 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, S. M. C., Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2016). Inquiry based learning models, information literacy, and student engagement: A literature review. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., & Bossomaier, T. (2011). Relativity in a rock field: A study of physics learning with a computer game. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6).

  • Castaneda, L., & Pacampara, M. (2016). Virtual reality in the classroom-An exploration of hardware, management, content and pedagogy. Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp 527–534). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Chang, H.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Wu, H.-K., Liang, J.-C., Lee, S.W.-Y., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, G., Humer, I., & Eckhardt, C. (2019, June). Special relativity in immersive learning. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 16–29). Springer, Cham.

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. Handling complexity in learning environments: research and theory, 107–128.

  • Dimitriadi, K., & Halkia, K. (2012). Secondary students’ understanding of basic ideas of special relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16), 2565–2582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D. F., Linn, M. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2014). Impacts and characteristics of computer-based science inquiry learning environments for precollege students. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 572–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice network. (2011). Science in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. https://doi.org/10.2797/7170

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fegely, A. G., Hagan, H. N., & Warriner, G. H., III. (2020). A practitioner framework for blended learning classroom inquiry-based virtual reality lessons. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 521–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment (Vol. 234). Routledge.

  • Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2019a). Investigating in-service teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 595–599). Springer, Cham.

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2019b). Teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning and their mitigation through professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(3), 335–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2020). A co-design approach for the development and classroom integration of embodied learning apps. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 217–229). Springer, Cham.

  • Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Developing, enacting and evaluating a learning experience design for technology-enhanced embodied learning in math classrooms. TechTrends, 65(1), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A., & Ioannou, M. (2019a). Investigating children’s immersion in a high-embodied versus low-embodied digital learning game in an authentic educational setting. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 222–233). Springer, Cham.

  • Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A., & Ioannou, M. (2019b). Investigating immersion and learning in a low-embodied versus high-embodied digital educational game: Lessons learned from an implementation in an authentic school classroom. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(4), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, Y., Tsivitanidou, O., Eckhardt, C., & Ioannou, A. (2020). Work-in-Progress—A learning experience design for immersive virtual reality in physics classrooms. In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) (pp. 263–266). IEEE.

  • Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, S. W., Corning, W., Funk, M., & Maes, P. (2018). Comparing learning in virtual reality with learning on a 2D screen using electrostatics activities. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(2), 220–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. A., Barnett, M., MaKinster, J. G., & Keating, T. (2004). The impact of three-dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomy concepts: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1555–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R., Childers, G., & Jones, M. G. (2019). Review of virtual reality hardware employed in K-20 science education. In Y. (Aimee) Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning (pp. 1389–1399). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2766-7_123

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P., Taylor, E. F., & Hickman, P. (1994). “Relativity readiness” using the RelLab program. The Physics Teacher, 32(2), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A. (2019). A model of gameful design for learning using interactive tabletops: Enactment and evaluation in the socio-emotional education classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y., & Retalis, S. (2020). Designing and orchestrating the classroom experience for technology-enhanced embodied learning.

  • Jowallah, R., Bennett, L., & Bastedo, K. (2018). Leveraging the affordances of virtual reality systems within K-12 Education: Responding to future innovations. FDLA Journal, 3(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students’ achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumi, J. (1994). Media comparison and deployment: A practitioner’s view. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyza, E. A., Constantinou, C. P., & Spanoudis, G. (2011). Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: Exploring relationships between grouping, reflective scaffolding, and evidence-based explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2489–2525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R., Antonenko, P., Etopio, E., & Seccia, A. (2018). Comparison of virtual reality and hands on activities in science education via functional near infrared spectroscopy. Computers & Education, 124, 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2007). Understanding and interpreting effect size measures. Social Work Research, 31(4), 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou, W. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2018). Virtual reality classroom applied to science education. In 2018 23rd International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  • Madden, J. H., Won, A. S., Schuldt, J. P., Kim, B., Pandita, S., Sun, Y., & Holmes, N. G. (2018). Virtual reality as a teaching tool for moon phases and beyond. http://arXiv.org/abs/1807.11179.

  • Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Kohnle, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): a theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 1–22.

  • Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). An online questionnaire for evaluating students’ and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist multimedia learning environments. Research in Science Education, 35(2–3), 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maresky, H. S., Oikonomou, A., Ali, I., Ditkofsky, N., Pakkal, M., & Ballyk, B. (2019). Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: Exploring immersive three – dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education. Clinical Anatomy, 32(2), 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, D., Wegener, M., McIntyre, T. J., Savage, C., & Williamson, M. (2010). Student experiences of virtual reality: A case study in learning special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 862–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers and Education, 56(3), 769–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1998). Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity—Emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911). New York: Springer.

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C. (1998). Chapter 2: Can we trace the “efficacy of social constructivism”? Review of Research in Education, 23(1), 25–71.

  • Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. B., & Deb, S. (2016). Smartphone based virtual reality systems in classroom teaching—a study on the effects of learning outcome. In 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 68–71). IEEE.

  • Salzman, M. C., Dede, C., & Loftin, R. B. (1995). Learner-centered design of sensorily immersive microworlds using a virtual reality interface. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 554–564). AACE, Charlottesville, VA.

  • Shin, Y. S. (2002). Virtual reality simulations in web‐based science education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 10(1), 18–25.

  • Southgate, E., Buchanan, R., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Eather, G., Smith, S. P., Scevak, J. (2018). What teachers should know about highly immersive virtual reality: insights from the VR School Study.

  • Spector, J. M. (Ed.). (2015). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology. Sage Publications.

  • Squires, D., & Preece, J. (1996). Usability and learning: Evaluating the potential of educational software. Computers & Education, 27(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In The practice of constructivism in science education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–22).

  • Tsivitanidou, O. E., Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). A Learning experience in inquiry-based physics with immersive virtual reality: Student perceptions and an interaction effect between conceptual gains and attitudinal profiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 841–861.

  • van der Valk, T., & de Jong, O. (2009). Scaffolding science teachers in open-inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 829–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. (2008). On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers & Education, 50(1), 154–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, D., Borchers, M., Ertl, T., Falk, M., Fechtig, O., Frank, R., & Zatloukal, M. (2006). Explanatory and illustrative visualization of special and general relativity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(4), 522–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2019). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: Effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.

  • Zhang, M., & Quintana, C. (2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online inquiry processes. Computers & Education, 58(1), 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CYENS Center of Exellence, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Yiannis Georgiou, Olia Tsivitanidou & Andri Ioannou

  2. Cyprus Interaction Lab, Department of Multimedia & Graphic Arts, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

    Yiannis Georgiou & Andri Ioannou

Authors
  1. Yiannis Georgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olia Tsivitanidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andri Ioannou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiannis Georgiou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Georgiou, Y., Tsivitanidou, O. & Ioannou, A. Learning experience design with immersive virtual reality in physics education. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 3051–3080 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10055-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10055-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation