Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241–255.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 115–132.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2016). Comparing apples and oranges? A critical look at research on learning from statics versus animations. Computers & Education, 102, 234–243.
Chandler, P. (2004). The crucial role of cognitive processes in the design of dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 353–357.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). London: Springer-Verlag.
Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713–729.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 343–351.
Höffler, T. N., Koć-Januchta, M., & Leutner, D. (2017). More evidence for three types of cognitive style: Validating the object-spatial imagery and verbal questionnaire using eye tracking when learning with texts and pictures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 109–115.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations—Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 209–216.
Höffler, T. N., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2010). The influence of visual cognitive style when learning from instructional animations and static pictures. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 479–483.
Höffler, T. N., & Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education, 57, 1716–1726.
Horton, R. L. (1978). The general linear model: Data analysis in the social and behavioral sciences. London: McGraw-Hill.
Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 392–404.
Jawed, S., Amin, H. U., Malik, A. S., & Faye, I. (2018, August). Differentiating between visual and non-visual learners using EEG power spectrum entropy. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced System (ICIAS, 2018), 13–14 August 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jiang, D., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2018). The curious case of improving foreign language listening skills by reading rather than listening: An expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1139–1165.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 852–861.
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48, 169–183.
Klingner, J., Kumar, R., & Hanrahan, P. (2008). Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In K-J Räihä (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on eye tracking research & applications (p. 69). New York: ACM.
Koć-Januchta, M., Höffler, T., Thoma, G. B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures–An eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 170–179.
Kraemer, D. J. M., Hamilton, R. H., Messing, S. B., DeSantis, J. H., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Cognitive style, cortical stimulation, and the conversion hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00015.
Kraemer, D. J. M., Rosenberg, L. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3792–3798.
Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.
Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177–189.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Gao, Y., & Paas, F. (2019). The modality effect in a mobile learning environment: Learning from spoken text and real objects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 574–586.
Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60, 95–109.
Massa, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–335.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 12, 125–141.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Research-based principles for learning with animation. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Research implications for design (pp. 30–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397.
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806–813.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. E. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256–265.
Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 833–841.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38, 43–52.
Mehigan, T. J., Barry, M., Kehoe, A., & Pitt, I. (2011, July). Using eye tracking technology to identify visual and verbal learners. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 11–15 July 2011, Barcelona, Spain.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 598–610.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics—A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional science, 32(1), 1–8.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1978). A dual coding approach to perception and cognition. In H. L. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 39–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., & Harshman, R. (1983). Factor-analysis of a questionnaire on imagery and verbal habits and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology - Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 37, 461–483.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25–36.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109–125.
Riding, R. J., & Adams, D. (1999). Cognitive style and inference speed following direct and indirect antecedents. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 29–49.
Riding, R. J., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 297–307.
Rieber, L. P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318–328.
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285–307.
Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., & Eitel, A. (2017). Learning from multimedia: Cognitive processes and instructional support. In S. Schwan & U. Cress (Eds.), The psychology of digital learning (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 304–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 53, 47–58.
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tabbers, H. K. (2002). The modality of text in multimedia instructions: Refining the design guidelines. Dissertation. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
Tabbers, H. K., & de Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38, 441–453.
Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2001). The modality effect in multimedia instructions. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1024–1029). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tsianos, N., Germanakos, P., Lekkas, Z., Mourlas, C., & Samaras, G. (2009, July). Eye-tracking users’ behavior in relation to cognitive style within an e-learning environment. Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Icalt 2009), 15–17 July 2009, Riga, Latvia.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J.-B., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
van Merriënboer, J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.
Wittrock, M. C. (1978). Developmental processes in learning from instruction. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 132, 352–373.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376.