Skip to main content
Log in

Case studies’ effect on undergraduates’ achievement, attitudes, and team shared mental models in educational psychology

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of case studies on learning outcomes, attitudes toward instructions, and team shared mental models (SMM) in a team-based learning environment in an undergraduate educational psychology course. Approximately 105 students who participated in this study were randomly assigned to either a case-study method or a knowledge-representation method. Students in the case-study treatment group received a case study after instruction, while students in the knowledge-representation treatment group engaged in an activity that did not involve problem solving. It was hypothesized that students in the case-study group would have higher learning outcomes scores, higher attitudes scores, and greater team SMM than students in the knowledge-representation group. Overall, the case-study method was effective as indicated by generally higher learning outcomes and more positive attitudes for the case-study treatment group as compared to the knowledge-representation group. It might be important to consider the order in which each of the instructional methods is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). SMMs in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, S. (2009). Assessment of the impact of case studies on student learning gains in an introductory biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(1), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Duran, J. L., & Taylor, A. R. (2007). Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(3), 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, V., Sharpe, D., Forristall, J., & Flynn, K. (2008). Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group process in case-based interprofessional learning. Medical Teacher, 30, 431–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (Eds.). (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3–11). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

  • Dupuis, R. E., & Perskey, A. K. (2008). Instructional design and assessment use of case-based learning in a clinical pharmacokinetics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(4), 542–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., & MacDougall, M. (1996). Students’ responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 719–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision making. Education, 128(4), 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C. F. (2007). What is a case? In J. Cocke & B. Smith (Eds.), Start with a story: The case study method of teaching college science (pp. 41–44). Arlington: National Sciences Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. N., & Buckley, P. (2004). An evaluation of case-based teaching: Evidence for continuing benefit and realization of aims. Advances in Physiology Education, 28, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. E., & Lee, Y. (2008). The relationship between SMMs and task performance in an online team- based learning environment. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O’Connor, D. L., Khalil, M. K., & Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a SMM instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10(4), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. D., Fulop, R. M., Marquez-Magana, L., & Tanner, K. D. (2008). Investigative cases and student outcomes in an upper-division cell and molecular biology laboratory course at a minority-serving institution. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhne-Eversmann, L., Eversmann, T., & Fischer, M. R. (2008). Team- and case-based learning to activate participants and enhance knowledge: An evaluation of seminars in Germany. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(3), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of SMMs on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical applications and interpretation (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2004). Team based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendas, A., Fonseca, M., & Pinto, P. R. (2006). Toward meaningful learning in undergraduate medical education using concept maps in a PBL pathophysiology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Fiore, E. (Eds.). (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (2005). Team cognition: Process and performance at the inter- and intra-individual level. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, SMMs, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struck, B. D., & Teasdale, T. A. (2008). Development and evaluation of a longitudinal case-based learning (CBL) experience for a geriatric medicine rotation. Gerontology and Geriatric Education, 28(3), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Woods, D., Felder, R., Rugarcia, A., & Stice, J. (2000). The future of engineering education. Chemical Engineering Education, 32(2), 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational Psychology. New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rim Razzouk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Razzouk, R., Johnson, T.E. Case studies’ effect on undergraduates’ achievement, attitudes, and team shared mental models in educational psychology. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 751–766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9307-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9307-4

Keywords

Navigation