Rising against a gathering storm: a biopolitical analysis of citizenship in STEM policy
Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) is a form of education seen by many governments and educators as a preparation of the types of students needed for the future. STEM education is being developed in many countries without the support of official policy, such as is the case in Canada. In the United States, the National Science Foundation (NSF), and a private non-profit organisation, Achieve Inc.™, have been enlisted to develop policy to guide the development on STEM nationally. Due to its influence in global politics and economy, many countries, including Canada, are interested in how the United States is preparing its citizens for the future through STEM education. In this paper we present a critical discourse analysis on STEM policy from the United States as a basis to discuss: biopolitics in science education; notions of citizenship in contemporary school education and science education; and citizenship and STEM education.
KeywordsBiopolitics Citizenship Critical Discourse Analysis Discourse Next Generation Science Standards Education Policy STEM
- Achieve, (2012). Taking root. Lessons learned for sustaining the college—and career—ready agenda. Achieve Inc. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Achieve Inc., (2013a). Next generation science standards: Front matter. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
- Achieve Inc., (2013b). Next generation science standards: Appendix C: College and career readiness. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
- Achieve Inc., (2013c). Next generation science standards: Appendix D: All standards, all students/case studies. Retrieved from from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
- Achieve Inc., (2013d). Next generation science standards: Appendix H: Nature of science. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org.
- American Educational Research Association. (2015). Annual meeting conference handbook. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
- Anft, M. (2013). The STEM crisis: Reality or myth? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(12). Retrieved from http://www.rit.edu/news/pdfs/CHE_Hira.pdf.
- Apple, M. W. (2004). Series editor’s introduction. In W. M. Roth & A. C. Barton (Eds.), Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Boyles, D. R. (Ed.). (2005). Schools or markets? commercialism, privatization, and school-business partnerships. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Calabrese Barton, A.M. (2012). Citizen(s’) science. Democracy and Education, 20(2). Article 12. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss1/12.
- Dorey, N. A. (2013). Coming soon: A new generation of assessments. Educational Leadership, 4, 28–34.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2003) Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976 (D. Macey, Trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Giroux, H. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism: Politics beyond the age of greed. New York: Paradigm.Google Scholar
- Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2007). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Heater, D. (2004). The civic ideal in world history, politics and education (3rd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, J. (2004). Citizenship beyond the state. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Huckin, T. N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text (pp. 78–92). Washington, CD: US Department of State.Google Scholar
- Kincheloe, J. L., Steinberg, S., & Tippins, D. J. (1992). The stigma of genius: Einstein and beyond modern education. Durango, CO: Hollowbrook.Google Scholar
- Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
- Krajcik, J., & Merritt, J. (2012). Engaging students in scientific practices: What does constructing and revising models look like in the science classroom? Understanding a framework for K-12 science education. The Science Teacher, 3, 38–41.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). View of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leyva, R. (2008). No child left behind: A neoliberal repackaging of social Darwinism. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7(1), 365–381.Google Scholar
- MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Marshall, T. H. (1998). Citizenship and social class. In G. Shafir (Ed.), The citizenship debates: A reader (pp. 6–93). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Mueller, M., Tippins, D., & Bryan, L. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
- NARST. (2015). Annual international conference handbook. NARST.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Sciences (NAS). (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President of the United States.Google Scholar
- Ravetz, J. R. (1979). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C., & Gutman, A. (1994). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tonso, K. & Weinstein, M. (2013). Occupying the E in STEM and Science. Paper presented at NARST, April 6–9, 2013, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
- van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, M. (2012). Schools/citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1). Article 6. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss1/6.
- Wood, G. H. (1998). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (pp. 177–198). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Merriam Webster, online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriamwebster.com.
- Žižek, S. (2000). The ticklish subject. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Žižek, S. (2004). Afterward. In J. Rancière (Ed.), The politics of aesthetic. (G. Rockhill, Trans.) New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar