Abstract
In this commentary, I interpret Xinying Yin and Gayle Ann Buck’s collaborative action research from a social–cultural perspective. Classroom implementation of formative assessment is viewed as interaction between this assessment method and the local learning culture. I first identify Yin and Buck’s definition of the formative assessment, and then analyze the role of formative assessment in the change of local learning culture. Based on the practice of Yin and Buck I emphasize the significance of their “bottom up” strategy to the teachers’ epistemological change. I believe that this strategy may provide practicable solutions to current Chinese educational problems as well as a means for science educators to shift toward systematic professional development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, H. L. (2010). Summing up and moving forward: Key challenges and future directions for research and development in formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 344–351). New York, NY: Routledge.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7–44. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–17). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Ding, B. (2008). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: The new development of classroom assessment theory and practice. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 28(9), 20–25.
Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Rinehard & Winston.
Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 61–79. doi:10.1080/09500690110066926.
Legge, J. (1893). Confucian analects and James Legge’s descriptions. Retrieved from http://www.cnculture.net/ebook/jing/sishu/lunyu_en/14.html.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ross, H., & Wang, Y. (2010). Guest editors’ introduction: the College Entrance Examination in China: An overview of its social–cultural foundations, existing problems, and consequences. Chinese Education and Society, 43(4), 3–11. doi:10.2753/CED1061-1932430400.
Shepard, L. E. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios in Knowledge Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 175–220. doi:10.1080/10508400701193697.
Wang, Q., 汪琪 & Liu, Z. 刘忠博 (2008). 什么“集体”?从华人文化看“个人主义”、“集体主义”与“关系主义” [What is collectivism? Understand individualism, collectivism and interactionism from Chinese cultural perspective]. Proceeding of the 华人传播想像会议 [Conference of Journalism & Communication], Hong Kong, China.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yang, R. (2004). Toward massification: Higher education development in the People’s Republic of China since 1949. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 311–374). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Yu, Z. (2002). Confucian education: A moral approach. Religion East and West, 2, 71.
Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 229–243. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6.
Zhang, Y. 张媛 (2012). 对个人主义的反思:爱默生VS孔子[The reflection to individualism: Emerson V.S. Confucians].南京师大学报[Journal of Nanjing Normal University], 5(3), 145–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This review essay addresses issues raised in Xinying Yin and Gayle Ann Buck’s paper entitled: There is another choice—An exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5.
Lead editor: A. Oliveira.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J. Formative assessment as a vehicle for changing classroom practice in a specific cultural context. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 10, 753–762 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9599-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9599-7