Skip to main content
Log in

Formative assessment as a vehicle for changing classroom practice in a specific cultural context

  • Forum
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this commentary, I interpret Xinying Yin and Gayle Ann Buck’s collaborative action research from a social–cultural perspective. Classroom implementation of formative assessment is viewed as interaction between this assessment method and the local learning culture. I first identify Yin and Buck’s definition of the formative assessment, and then analyze the role of formative assessment in the change of local learning culture. Based on the practice of Yin and Buck I emphasize the significance of their “bottom up” strategy to the teachers’ epistemological change. I believe that this strategy may provide practicable solutions to current Chinese educational problems as well as a means for science educators to shift toward systematic professional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade, H. L. (2010). Summing up and moving forward: Key challenges and future directions for research and development in formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 344–351). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7–44. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–17). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, B. (2008). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: The new development of classroom assessment theory and practice. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 28(9), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Rinehard & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 61–79. doi:10.1080/09500690110066926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. (1893). Confucian analects and James Legge’s descriptions. Retrieved from http://www.cnculture.net/ebook/jing/sishu/lunyu_en/14.html.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., & Wang, Y. (2010). Guest editors’ introduction: the College Entrance Examination in China: An overview of its social–cultural foundations, existing problems, and consequences. Chinese Education and Society, 43(4), 3–11. doi:10.2753/CED1061-1932430400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. E. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios in Knowledge Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 175–220. doi:10.1080/10508400701193697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., 汪琪 & Liu, Z. 刘忠博 (2008). 什么“集体”?从华人文化看“个人主义”、“集体主义”与“关系主义” [What is collectivism? Understand individualism, collectivism and interactionism from Chinese cultural perspective]. Proceeding of the 华人传播想像会议 [Conference of Journalism & Communication], Hong Kong, China.

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2004). Toward massification: Higher education development in the People’s Republic of China since 1949. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 311–374). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z. (2002). Confucian education: A moral approach. Religion East and West, 2, 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 229–243. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. 张媛 (2012). 对个人主义的反思:爱默生VS孔子[The reflection to individualism: Emerson V.S. Confucians].南京师大学报[Journal of Nanjing Normal University], 5(3), 145–156.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingping Chen.

Additional information

This review essay addresses issues raised in Xinying Yin and Gayle Ann Buck’s paper entitled: There is another choiceAn exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5.

Lead editor: A. Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J. Formative assessment as a vehicle for changing classroom practice in a specific cultural context. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 10, 753–762 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9599-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9599-7

Keywords

Navigation