Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts

  • International Review
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many reform initiatives adopt a reductionist, proceduralized approach to cultural change, assuming that deep changes can be realized by introducing new classroom activities, textbooks, and technological tools. This article elaborates a complex system perspective of learning culture: A learning culture as a complex system involves macro-level properties (e.g., epistemological beliefs, social values, power structures) and micro-level features (e.g., technology, classroom activities). Deep changes in macro-level properties cannot be reduced to any component. This complex system perspective is applied to examining technology-supported educational change in East Asia and analyzing how teachers sustain the knowledge building innovation in different contexts. Working with the macro–micro dynamics in a learning culture requires a principle-based approach to learning innovation that specifies macro-level changes using principle-based instead of procedure-based terms and engages teachers’ deep reflection and creative engagement at both the macro- and the micro-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1999). Complexity and the economy. Science, 284, 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teaching, learning, and computing national survey report #3: Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota.

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodilly, S. J. (1998). Lessons from new American schools’ scale-up phase. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1990). The social psychology of the Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213–266). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences (Or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbic, P. (2006). Chinese learners and online discussions. New opportunities for multicultural classrooms. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, M., & Cavanaugh, S. (2001). Technology as an agent of change in teacher practice. T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 40, 42, 44, 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. M. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. A. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y. F., & Kang, T. K. (1984). Intergenerational comparisons of child-rearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1004–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, & R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335–355). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. S. (2009). An idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2002). What is “Chinese” about Chinese civilization? In M. Mozaffari (Ed.), Globalization and civilizations (pp. 218–241). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., & Chen, D. T. (2003). Online learning and information technology in the Asia–Pacific region. Educational Technology, 43(3), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: Large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, I. (2000). Technology innovations and the development of distance education: Korean experience. Open Learning, 15(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2006). Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese, 151, 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. L. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1999). Knowing teaching from the inside out: Implications of inquiry in practice for teacher education. In G. Griffen (Ed.), The education of teachers: 98th yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 167–184). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Yuen, H. K., Ki, W. W., Li, S. C., & Lee, Y. (1999). Second international information technology in education study: Hong Kong SAR report. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://sites.cite.hku.hk/full_report.htm

  • Lee, D. (2004). Web-based instruction in China. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B., Foley, D., & Holland, D. (Eds.). (1996). The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X.-M. (1996). Good writing in cross-cultural context. Albany, NY: SUNY press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., & Hatano, G. (2003). Technology, culture, and adaptive minds. Mind, Cultures, and Activity, 10(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. (1990). Understanding culture: A pre-condition for effective learning. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizukoshi, T., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2000). Instructional technology in Asia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (1994). Emergent properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the computer-supported collaborative learning 2002 Conference (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Pratt, D. D., & Wong, K. M. (1999). Chinese conceptions of “effective teaching” in Hong Kong: Towards culturally sensitive evaluation of teaching. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18, 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., & Oliver, M. (2007). Technology and change in educational practice (guest editorial). Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Almog, T. (1998). Educational psychology and technology: A matter of reciprocal relations. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 222–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1996). Learning in wonderland. In S. T. Kerr (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling (pp. 111–129). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/knowledge forum®. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 183–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap. New York, NY: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. H., & Twu, H. L. (2002). Educational technology in Taiwan. Education Media International, 39(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2002). Incorporating ICT into K-12 schools. TechTrends, 46(4), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2007). A cultural look at information and communication technologies in Eastern education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Teo, C., Scardamalia, M., & Morley, E. (2008). Constantly going deeper: Knowledge building innovation in an elementary professional community. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2007). Sustaining principle-based knowledge building innovation at an elementary school. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Wu, G., & Li, F. (2003). The current status of online learning under implementation: A survey of distance learners. Open Education Research, 9(4), 5–12 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Gu, X., & Wang, Q. (2003). A panorama of online education in China. Educational Technology, 43(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2001). Educational technology in transnational higher education in South East Asia. Educational Technology and Society, 4(4), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Theory and Practice, University at Albany, SUNY, 1400 Washington Ave, ED 115B, Albany, NY, 12222, USA

    Jianwei Zhang

Authors
  1. Jianwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianwei Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, J. Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Education Tech Research Dev 58, 229–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation