Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism

  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study outlines the perceptions of four Muslim graduate students regarding Islam and its influence on their approach to the teaching and learning of science. All of the four interviewees were enrolled in science related programmes at a Midwestern US university. The interview responses were evaluated both within the frame of the Islamization of science and Ian Barbour’s (When science meets religion: enemies, strangers, or partners?, Harper, San Francisco, 2000) classification, which is based on four categories; conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. Interviews were semi-structured and the data analyzed using a framework of typological and interpretive approaches (Hatch in Doing qualitative research in education settings, State University of New York Press, New York, 2002). The interview findings show that Barbour’s classification is a useful tool for categorizing perceptions. However, these perceptions may fall into more than one category. A surprising side effect was the misinterpretation and misuse of constructivism as well as the notion of a scientific theory as ways to negate the theory of evolution, and promote the teaching of intelligent design. These misinterpretations and misuses occur because there is the belief that the interaction between science and religion in daily life is considered part of the cultural setting in Islamic countries, which is what students bring to the table, as well as the notion that reality can only be found in the Qur’an.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El- Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representation of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855. doi:10.1002/tea.20226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alat, Z. (2005). Politics of gender and sexuality in teachers’ lives. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

  • Al-Hayani, F. A. (2005). Islam and science: Contradiction or concordance. Journal of Religion and Science, 40, 565–576. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00688.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashgar, A., Wiles, J. R., & Alters, B. (2010). The origin and evolution of life in Pakistani high school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 65–71. doi:10.1080/00219266.2010.9656196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atay, H., & Cubukcu, I. A. (1961). El-iktisad fi el-itikad [Mainstream in the faith]. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, B. L. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, H. (2005). İslam Düşünce Geleneğinde Din, Felsefe ve Bilim. [Religious, philosophy, and science in Islamic thought]. Ankara: Naturel Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, H. (2009). Postmodern Çağda İslam ve Bilim [Islam and science in postmodern age]. İstanbul: Bilim ve Gelecek Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (2000). When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers, or partners? San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAV (Scientific Research Foundation). (2006). Retrieved June 22, 2006, from http://www.bilimarastirmavakfi.org/bav_dunyada_darwinizm.html.

  • Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education,. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S., Wiles, J. R., Ashgar, A., & Alters, B. (2011). Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese students’ conceptions of biological evolution. Science & Education, 20, 895–915. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9345-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarifying Christianity. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml.

  • Colburn, A., & Henriques, L. (2006). Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 419–442. doi:10.1002/tea.20109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2007, June 8). The dangers of creationism in education. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc07/EDOC11297.htm#P221_39314.

  • Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (2002). Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/w/c0609.html.

  • Dangor, S. (2005). Islamization of disciplines: Towards an indigenous educational system. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 519–531. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00138.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillabough, J. (1999). Gender politics and conceptions of the modern teacher: Women, identity, and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 373–394. doi:10.1080/01425699995326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, R. A. (2003). Christianity, Islam, and political culture: Lessons from Sub-Saharan African in comparative perspective. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.

  • Dudoignon, S. A., & Hisao, K. (2001). Islam in politics in Russia and Central Asia: Early eighteenth to late twentieth centuries. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1973). What makes school ethnography ethnographic? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 4(2), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2003). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1174). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidar, H. A. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers’ views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 807–822. doi:10.1080/095006999290309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 395–419. doi:10.1002/tea.20233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoodbhoy, P. (1985). Ideological problems for science in Pakistan. In A. Khan (Ed.), Islam, politics and the state (pp. 178–191). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, C. (2006). The never ending dance: Islamism, Kemalism, and the power of self-institution in Turkey. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 17, 161–178. doi:10.1111/j.1835-9310.2006.tb00055.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 75, 28–34. doi:10.2307/20047828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. F., Doster, E. C., Meadows, L., & Wood, T. (1995). Hearts and minds in science classroom: The education of a confirmed evolutionist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 585–611. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan, T. (2003). Mawdudi’s critique of the secular mind. The Muslim World, 93, 503–519. doi:10.1111/1478-1913.00034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (2001). Constructivism in school science education: Powerful model or the most dangerous intellectual tendency? In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto & M. R. Matthews (Eds.), Science education and culture: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (pp. 153–164). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0730-6_10.

  • Lacey, H. (1996). On relations between science and religion. Science & Education, 5, 143–153. doi:10.1007/BF00428614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liederman, L. M. (2000). Religious diversity in schools: The Muslim headscarf controversy and beyond. Social Compass, 47, 367–381. doi:10.1177/003776800047003006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciak, M. (2006). Minority schooling and intercultural education: A comparison of recent developments in the old and new EU member states. Intercultural Education, 17, 73–80. doi:10.1080/14675980500502370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5, 102–123. doi:10.1007/BF00428612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ interpretations of Islamic culture related to science education versus the Islamic epistemology and ontology of science. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 5, 127–140. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9214-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 9(2), 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed., p. 39). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A., & Browitt, J. (2002). Contemporary cultural theory (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peker, D., Comert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates’ acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 739–755. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9199-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F. (1970). Islamic modernism: Its scope, method and alternatives. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 1, 317–333. doi:10.1017/S0020743800000714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayin, U., & Kence, A. (1999). Islamic scientific creationism: A new challenge in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, T. (1996). Applying scientific openmindedness to religion and science education. Science & Education, 5, 125–141. doi:10.1007/BF00428613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M. (1999). Fundamentalist bedfellows: Political creationism in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, L. (1996). The Islamization of science: Four Muslim positions developing an Islamic modernity. New York: Coronet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, T. (2007). The religio-scientific frameworks of pre-service primary teachers: An analysis of their influence of their teaching of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 909–930. doi:10.1080/09500690600924934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskin, O., Çobanoğlu, E. O., Apaydın, Z., Çobanoğlu, H., Yılmaz, B., & Şahin, B. (2008). Lisans öğrencilerin kuram kavramını algılayışları [Undergraduate students’ perceptions of theory concept]. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 25(2), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, M. (2004). One nation, under the designer. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 264–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turam, B. (2004). The politics of engagement between Islam and the secular state: Ambivalences of civil society. The British Journal of Sociology, 55, 259–281. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00018.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Geel, T. (2006). Science, intelligent design, and the constitution. American Journal of Education, 112, 589–604. doi:10.1086/505061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensinck, A. J. (1965). The Muslim creed: Its genesis and historical development. Western Germany: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. R. (2011). Challenges to teaching evolution: What’s a head? Futures, 43, 787–796. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Alejandro Gallard, Dr. Hasan Aydin, and reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Taşkın.

Additional information

Lead Editor: A. Gallard Martinez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taşkın, Ö. An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 9, 855–875 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9553-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9553-0

Keywords

Navigation