Abstract
This study aims to examine the affect of the degree of religiosity of student teachers, and their nationalism and scientific background on their perception of the nature of science (NOS). First year Arab and Jewish religiously observant, traditional and secular students in Israel (101 in number) with different scientific backgrounds participated in the study. The students completed a closed questionnaire with 35 statements that explored diverse aspects of the perception of the NOS. The findings show that previous scientific knowledge or belonging to the Jewish or Arab nation barely impacts the perceptions of the NOS. In contrast, religious belief, whether Jewish or Muslim, had significant impact. The more religious the students the greater weight they afforded culture and society versus science, and their support of the freedom of inquiry and of the tentativeness of science declined. The educational implications of the findings are discussed in view of the social increase in dogmatic religious belief alongside the unreserved exacerbated skepticism of every truth. Emphasis is placed on reinforcing the liberal dialogue approach that does not fear criticizing tradition, according to which it is possible to educate to critical thought without negating religious belief.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049.
Aziza, A., & Bar, V. (2000). Cultural influences on ways of teaching and learning natural sciences amidst high school Arab students in two different educational systems. Iyunim Ba’Chinuch, 4(2), 109–136.
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655–682.
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003a). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352. Retrieved May 03 2012, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=669178901&Fmt=7&clientId=47683&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003b). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352. Retrieved May 03 2012, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=669178901&Fmt=7&clientId=47683&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Bickmore, B. R., Thompson, K. R., Grandy, D. A., & Tomlin, T. (2009). Commentary: On teaching the nature of science and the science-religion interface. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(3), 168–177. Retrieved May 03 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/202781184?accountid=41238.
Bistrov, I., & Sofer, A. (2010). Israel, 2010–2030 on the path to a religious state. Haifa: The Reuven Chaikin Chair of Geostrategy.
Buaraphan, K. (2010). Pre-service and in-service science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Science Educator, 19(2), 35–47.
Campbell, R. A. (2005). Students’ views on the relationship between religion and science: Analyses of results from a comparative survey. The Canadian Review of Sociology, 42(3), 249–265.
Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235–251.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Social survey 2010. Israel: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Cohen, Y. (1997). Education in the test of time. In E. Peldi (Ed.), (pp (pp. 286–289). Tel-Aviv: Ramot, Tel-Aviv University.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. P. (2007). Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics. Social Problems, 54(2), 289–307.
Ernest, P. (1991). Mathematics, teacher education, and quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 16(1), 56–65.
Farber, P. (2003). Teaching evolution & the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 65(5), 347. Retrieved May 01 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219003186?accountid=41238.
Feynman, R. P. (1969). What is science? Retrieved May 21 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/64438098?accountid=41238.
Fleener, M. J. (1996). Scientific world building on the edge of chaos: High school students’ beliefs about mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics [H.W.Wilson - EDUC], 96, 312. Retrieved April, 03, 2012, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=10290933&Fmt=7&clientId=47683&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Gauchat, G. W. (2008). A test of three theories of anti-science attitudes. Sociological Focus, 41(4), 337-357. Retrieved April 03 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218159144?accountid=41238.
Golabek, C., & Amrane-Cooper, I. (2011). Trainee teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science and implications for pre-service teacher training in England. Research in Secondary Teacher Education, 1(2), 9–13.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Hatano, G., Siegler, R. S., Richards, P. D., Inagaki, K., Stavy, R., & Wax, N. (1993). The development of biological knowledge: A multi-national study. Retrieved April 7 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62802484?accountid=41238.
Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143–166.
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 1–8.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Liu, S., & Lederman, N. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldview and conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281–1307.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5(2), 101–123.
Mansour, N. (2008). Religious beliefs: A hidden variable in the performance of science teachers in the classroom. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 557–576.
McKinley, E., Waiti, P. M., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 579–595.
Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6(4), 397–416.
Moore, J. A. (1993). Science as a way of knowing: The foundation of modern biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nickels, M. (1998). The nature of modern science and scientific knowledge Retrieved April 13 2012, from http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/mart.nos.pdf.
Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: A philosophical perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530–540.
Peleg, R., & Raslan, S. (2002). Multiculturalism in the training of Arab teachers in oranim college: Political, social and professional dilemmas and their implications of the college, on the curricula and on the trainees. Oranim College, Haifa: The Fourth Scientific Conference of the Research and Evaluation Unit.
Perla, R. J., & Carifio, J. (2008). Can our conception of the nature of science be tentative without qualification? The Journal of Educational Thought, 42(2), 127–150.
Reiss, M. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236.
Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R., Oliver, J. S., & Crawley, F. E. (1994). Research on the affective diminution of science learning. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211–233). New York: Macmillan.
Taber, K., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000. Retrieved April 13 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/902841512?accountid=41238.
The Marker. (2012). Scientists warn-cooperatives reinforce the anti-science inclination in the USA. Retrieved April 03 2012, from http://www.themarker.com/wallstreet/1.645327.
Yarchi, R. (1999). Educational stances of religiosity versus secularity and science in state-religious colleges of education that received academic authorization. Mayim Midalav Academic Journal of Jewish and Educational Studies, 181–201.
Zar’our, G. (1976). Interpretation of natural phenomena by Lebanese school children. Science Education, 60(2), 227–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: L. Carter
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aflalo, E. Religious belief: the main impact on the perception of the nature of science on student teachers. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 623–641 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9504-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9504-9