Abstract
This article examines the multiple methodologies used in educational research and proposes a model that includes all of them as contributing to understanding educational contexts and research from multiple perspectives. The model, based on integral theory (Wilber in a theory of everything. Shambhala, Boston, 2000) values all forms of research as true, but partial. Consideration of objective (exterior) forms of research and data and subjective (interior) forms of research and data are further divided into individual and collective domains. Taking this categorization system one step further reveals eight indigenous perspectives that form a framework for considering research methodologies. Each perspective has unique questions, data sources, methods and quality criteria designed to reveal what is “true” from that view. As science educators who guide our students’ research, this framework offers a useful guide to explain differences in types of research, the purpose and validity of each. It allows professional science educators to appreciate multiple forms of research while maintaining rigorous quality criteria. Use of this framework can also help avoid problems of imposing quality criteria of one methodology on research data and questions gathered using another methodology. This model is explored using the second author’s dissertation research. Finally a decision chart is provided to use with those who are starting inquiries to guide their thinking and choice of appropriate methodologies to use when conducting research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, F. (1984). The nature of science. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational.
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39, 243–253.
Braud, W., & Anderson, R. (Eds.). (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Callihan, L. P. (2011). A qualitative inquiry into the development and facilitation of a science education learning community through participation in an online graduate program. Dissertation. FSU. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-04102011-123008/.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Creswell, J. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eisner, E. W. (1981). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 10(4), 5.
Esbjorn-Hargens, S., & Zimmerman, M. (2009). Integral ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Boston: Integral Books.
Forman, M. D. (2010). A guide to integral psychotherapy: Complexity, integration, and spirituality in practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
Fuhs, C. (2010). Essential integral. Boulder: Core Integral.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Laughlin, R., & Pines, D. (2000). The theory of everything. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(1), 28.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Taylor, P. C., Taylor, E., & Luitel, B. C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 373–387). Dordrecht: Springer.
Torbert, B. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transformational leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121–140.
Wilber, K. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (1998). Marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House.
Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything. Boston: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: Peter C. Taylor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, N.T., Callihan, L.P. Integral methodological pluralism in science education research: valuing multiple perspectives. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 8, 505–516 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9480-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9480-5