Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and Morphologic Factors Associated with Suture Anchor Refixation of Labral Tears in the Hip

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

The acetabular labrum is critical to hip function. Surgical options for treatment of a damaged labrum include removal, debridement, and refixation using suture anchors.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study is to determine if certain patient demographic and osseous morphological factors result in increased labral damage requiring refixation.

Methods

Data was collected prospectively from a consecutive series of 334 procedures performed from August 2010 to June 2011 for femoroacetabular impingement. Demographic data, including age, sex, and race, was collected from patient charts. Three-dimensional (3D) CT scans were reviewed to retrieve alpha angles, acetabular version, femoral version, and lateral center edge angle on the symptomatic hip.

Results

In 238 (71.3%) of the procedures, the labrum required refixation using suture anchors with a mean of 2.74 anchors being used. Of males, 78.8% required suture anchors and 62.3% of females required suture anchors. Among procedures requiring suture anchors, significantly more suture anchors were used in males (2.92) than females (2.47). Regression analysis showed a positive association between alpha angle, acetabular retroversion at 1 and 2 o’clock, and the number of suture anchors used. The mean alpha angle in the cohort that required suture anchors (63.1°) was significantly greater than the cohort that did not (59.4°).

Conclusion

This study found femoral deformities to contribute more to labral damage than acetabular deformities and highlighted the importance of preoperative 3D CT scans. This study provides demographic and morphologic factors to review preoperatively to evaluate if extensive labral damage is present and if suture anchor refixation will be required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2011; 469(2): 464-469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2005; 23(6): 1286-1292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British. 2005; 87(7): 1012-1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, Kelly BT. Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2010; 27(2): 235-251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT. The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(10): 1135-1145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clohisy JC, St John LC, Schutz AL. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(2): 555-564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ejnisman L, Philippon MJ, Lertwanich P. Acetabular labral tears: diagnosis, repair, and a method for labral reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2011; 30(2): 317-329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis AR, Noble PC, Schroder SJ, Thompson MT, Stocks GW. The cam impinging femur has multiple morphologic abnormalities. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(6 Suppl): 59-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Espinosa N, Beck M, Rothenfluh DA, Ganz R, Leunig M (2007) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 2 Pt.1):36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freehill MT, Safran MR. The labrum of the hip: diagnosis and rationale for surgical correction. Clin Sports Med. 2011; 30(2): 293-315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2003; 417(417): 112-120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu GS, Zhu D, Wang G, Wang CX. Roles of radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, three-dimensional computed tomography in early diagnosis of femoro-acetabular impingement in 17 cases. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2009; 12(6): 375-378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henak CR, Ellis BJ, Harris MD, Anderson AE, Peters CL, Weiss JA. Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint. J Biomech. 2011; 44(12): 2201-2206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heyworth BE, Dolan MM, Nguyen JT, Chen NC, Kelly BT. Preoperative three-dimensional CT predicts intraoperative findings in hip arthroscopy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2012; 470(7): 1950-1957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson JK, Renner JB, Dahners LE. Anteroposterior thickening of the femoral neck with aging decreases the “offset” in men. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012; 40(10): 2213-2217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2008; 466(3): 677-683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kappe T, Kocak T, Bieger R, Reichel H, Fraitzl CR. Radiographic risk factors for labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 3241-3247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klingenstein GG, Zbeda RM, Bedi A, Magennis E, Kelly BT. Prevalence and preoperative demographic and radiographic predictors of bilateral femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(4): 762-768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Konan S, Rayan F, Haddad FS. Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British. 2010; 92(1): 47-50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(4): 369-376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Larson CM, Kelly BT, Stone RM. Making a case for anterior inferior iliac spine/subspine hip impingement: three representative case reports and proposed concept. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(12): 1732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lertwanich P, Ejnisman L, Torry MR, Giphart JE, Philippon MJ (2011) Defining a safety margin for labral suture anchor insertion using the acetabular rim angle. Am J Sports Med. 39 Suppl(39):111S-6S.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leunig M, Ganz R. [FAI—concept and etiology]. Orthopade. 2009; 38(5): 394-401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Milone MT, Bedi A, Poultsides L, et al. Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(8): 2484-2491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mintz DN, Hooper T, Connell D, Buly R, Padgett DE, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(4): 385-393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006; 240(3): 778-785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Philippon MJ, Arnoczky SP, Torrie A. Arthroscopic repair of the acetabular labrum: a histologic assessment of healing in an ovine model. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(4): 376-380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Potter HG, Schachar J. High resolution noncontrast MRI of the hip. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010; 31(2): 268-278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi LP, Li Y, Tang L, et al. Evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with the same group of patients. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1018): e906-e911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rakhra KS. Magnetic resonance imaging of acetabular labral tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(Suppl 2): 28-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schilders E, Dimitrakopoulou A, Bismil Q, Marchant P, Cooke C. Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative study of refixation and resection with a minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(8): 1027-1032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Seldes RM, Tan V, Hunt J, Katz M, Winiarsky R, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2001; 382(382): 232-240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2007; 25(1): 122-131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tokish JM, McBratney CM, Solomon DJ, Leclere L, Dewing CB, Provencher MT. Arthroscopic repair of circumferential lesions of the glenoid labrum: surgical technique. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2010; 92(Suppl 1 Pt 2): 130-144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Turker M, Kilicoglu O, Goksan B, Bilgic B. Vascularity and histology of fetal labrum and chondrolabral junction: its relevance to chondrolabral detachment tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(2): 381-386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zaltz I, Kelly BT, Hetsroni I, Bedi A. The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(8): 2463-2470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was partially funded by a research grant from Mitek Sports Medicine.

Disclosures

Conflict of Interest:

John A. Ruder, BS and Erin Magennis, BA have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Bryan T. Kelly, MD received grant funding from Mitek Sports Medicine for the study.

Human/Animal Rights:

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent:

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Ruder BS.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Level II evidence; Development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1225 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1225 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1225 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 1225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruder, J.A., Magennis, E., Ranawat, A.S. et al. Clinical and Morphologic Factors Associated with Suture Anchor Refixation of Labral Tears in the Hip. HSS Jrnl 10, 18–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9372-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9372-6

Keywords

Navigation