Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185
Boechat, M., & Venturini, T. (2016). From analysis to presentation. Les Cahiers Du Numérique, 12(4), 185–196.
Cekaite, A. (2009). Collaborative corrections with spelling control: Digital resources and peer assistance. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9067-7.
Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107(Supplement C), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.002.
Chung, J. S., & Neuman, D. (2007). High school students’ information seeking and use for class projects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1503–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20637.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2014). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://books.google.se/books?id=nHW3AwAAQBAJ.
Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting students’ learning and Socioscientific reasoning about climate change—The effect of computer-based concept mapping scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7.
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. (2016). Filter bubbles, Echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 298.
Forte, A. (2015). The new information literate: Open collaboration and information production in schools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9210-6.
Furberg, A. (2016). Teacher support in computer-supported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9229-3.
Furberg, A., Kluge, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2013). Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9165-4.
Granka, L. A. (2010). The politics of search: A decade retrospective. The Information Society, 26(5), 364–374.
Hillman, T. (2014). Tracing the construction of mathematical activity with an advanced graphing calculator to understand the roles of technology developers, teachers and students. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 37–47.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401.
Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and behavioral patterns while exploring Socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9477-1.
Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133634.
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS One, 9(6), e98679.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z.
Knight, S., & Mercer, N. (2014). The role of exploratory talk in classroom search engine tasks. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.931884.
Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9110-3.
Krange, I., & Arnseth, H. C. (2012). Students’ meaning making in science: Solving energy resource problems in virtual worlds combined with spreadsheets to develop graphs. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(3), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9361-3.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2002). Complexities. Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham: Duke University Press.
Lin, C.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Participatory learning through behavioral and cognitive engagements in an online collective information searching activity. An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, 7(4), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9160-1.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science Technology & Human Values, 40(5), 655–686.
Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95, 601–626.
Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. London: Routledge.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning: The performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x.
Schwendimann, B. A., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Comparing two forms of concept map critique activities to facilitate knowledge integration processes in evolution education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21244.
Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical analysis. London: Routledge.
Solli, A., Hillman, T., & Mäkitalo, Å. (2017). Navigating the complexity of socio-scientific controversies—How students make multiple voices present in discourse. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9668-5.
Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. D., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. na.
Venturini, T. (2010a). Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796–812.
Venturini, T. (2010b). How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796–812.
Venturini, T., & Latour, B. (2010). The social fabric: Digital traces and qual-quantatitive methods. Retrieved from (www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publications/Venturini_LatourThe_Social_Fabric.pdf).
Venturini, T., Ricci, D., Mauri, M., Kimbell, L., & Meunier, A. (2015). Designing controversies and their publics. Design Issues, 31(3), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00340.
Walsh, E., & Tsurusaki, B. (2017). “Thank you for being republican”: Negotiating science and political identities in climate change learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1362563.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9267-5.
Wu, Y.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). The effects of different on-line searching activities on high school students’ cognitive structures and informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9189-y.
Yoon, S. A. (2011). Using social network graphs as visualization tools to influence peer selection decision-making strategies to access information about complex Socioscientific issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 549–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.563655.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. Theory, research and practice. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on research in science education (Vol. 1–II, pp. 697–726). New York: Routledge.