Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal change of emotions: Identifying academic emotion trajectories and profiles in problem-solving

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic emotions play an important and complex role in self-regulated learning (SRL). However, few studies have examined how academic emotions unfold in different phases of SRL and how the changes in these emotions influence learning performance. The current study examines 98 students’ academic emotion trajectories and profiles across the three phases of SRL (i.e., forethought, performance, and self-reflection) as they solve a clinical problem in BioWorld. Specifically, BioWorld is a simulated learning environment where medical students are tasked with diagnosing virtual patient diseases. We identified the three phases of SRL based on students’ problem-solving behaviors and we asked students to self-report their achievement and epistemic emotions at the end of each phase of SRL. The growth curve model results showed that curiosity and confusion declined across the three phases of SRL, whereas boredom increased in the self-reflection phase of SRL. The initial levels of curiosity and enjoyment positively predicted students’ performance. Latent transition analysis revealed three emotion profiles: curious-positive, confused-negative, and medium–low. Curious-positive students maintained a relatively stable profile through the SRL phases, whereas students in the confused-negative and medium–low groups exhibited specific transition patterns in their emotions. This study makes theoretical contributions by highlighting the temporal and dynamic nature of emotions in problem-solving. Findings from this study have educational implications regarding the role of specific emotions in learning, the development of one’s awareness of their emotions, and emotion regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  • Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., Richardson, N. (2005). Students tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students' reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 433–447.

  • Agarwal, N. K. (2011). Verifying survey items for construct validity: A two-stage sorting procedure for questionnaire design in information behavior research. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Martin, F., Malfaz, M., Sequeira, J., Gorostiza, J. F., & Salichs, M. A. (2013). A multimodal emotion detection system during human–robot interaction. Sensors, 13(11), 15549–15581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Diabetes Association. (2002). Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25(1), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artino, A. R. J., Hemmer, P. A., & Durning, S. J. (2011). Using self-regulated learning theory to understand the beliefs, emotions, and behaviors of struggling medical students. Academic Medicine, 86(10), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a603d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Rethinking the role of positive affect in self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 22(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023080224401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondino, M., Raccanello, D., & Pasini, M. (2014). Achievement goals as antecedents of achievement emotions: The 3 X 2 achievement goal model as a framework for learning environments design. In T. Mascio, R. Gennari, P. Vitorini, R. Vicari, & F. de la Prieta (Eds.), Methodologies and intelligent systems for technology enhanced learning (pp. 53–60). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., Russo, J. E., & Hirsch, I. B. (2003). The relationship of depressive symptoms to symptom reporting, self-care and glucose control in diabetes. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-8343(03)00055-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S. (2012). Monitoring affective trajectories during complex learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2325–2328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_849

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S. (2013). A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. C., Lajoie, S. P., Pekrun, R., & Lachapelle, K. (2018). Emotions in medical education: Examining the validity of the Medical Emotion Scale (MES) across authentic medical learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2017). Affect, epistemic emotions, metacognition, and self-Regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 119(13), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, J. W., Kashima, Y., & Laham, S. M. (2014). Multiple emotions: A person-centered approach to the relationship between intergroup emotion and action orientation. Emotion, 14(4), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. I., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty. Cognitive Psychology, 81, 74–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganotice, F. A., Datu, J. A. D., & King, R. B. (2016). Which emotional profiles exhibit the best learning outcomes? A person-centered analysis of students’ academic emotions. School Psychology International, 37(5), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316660147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Bieg, M., Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., & Hall, N. C. (2015). The glass half empty: How emotional exhaustion affects the state-trait discrepancy in self-reports of teaching emotions. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance. In D. Schunk & J.A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 18–32). Routledge.

  • Hesser, H. (2015). Modeling individual differences in randomized experiments using growth models: Recommendations for design, statistical analysis and reporting of results of internet interventions. Internet Interventions, 2(2), 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(3), 329–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (2004). Some perspectives on positive feelings and emotions: Positive affect facilitates thinking and problem-solving. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 263–281). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Rosenzweig, A. S., & Young, M. J. (1991). The influence of positive affect on cinical problem solving. Medical Decision Making, 11(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9101100313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, A. (2018). The regulation of achievement emotions in higher education: An examination of emotion (Publication No. 10169573). [Doctoral dissertation, McGill University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

  • Jarrell, A., Harley, J. M., & Lajoie, S. P. (2016). The link between achievement emotions, appraisals, and task performance: Pedagogical considerations for emotions in CBLEs. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0064-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, A., Harley, J. M., Lajoie, S., & Naismith, L. (2017). Success, failure and emotions: Examining the relationship between performance feedback and emotions in diagnostic reasoning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9521-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J., Zayac, R., & Correia, C. (2008). Curvilinear relationships between statistics anxiety and performance among undergraduate students: Evidence for optimal anxiety. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 4–15. Scopus.

  • Kim, S., Georgiou, P. G., Lee, S., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Real-time emotion detection system using speech: Multi-modal fusion of different timescale features. In 2007 IEEE 9th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (pp. 48–51). IEEE.

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, R. A. (2013). Integration of innovative clinical reasoning pedagogies into a baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Creative Nursing, 19(3), 128–139.

  • Laffel, L. (1999). Ketone bodies: A review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes. Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews, 15(6), 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P. (2009). Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: Examples from avionics and medicine. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 61–83). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P., Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2018). Examining the role of self-regulation and emotion in clinical reasoning: Implications for developing expertise. Medical Teacher, 40(8), 842–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P., Zheng, J., Li, S., Jarrell, A., & Gube, M. (2019). Examining the interplay of affect and self regulation in the context of clinical reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Zheng, J., & Lajoie, S. P. (2021a). The frequency of emotions and emotion variability in self-regulated learning: What matters to task performance?. Frontline Learning Research, 9(4), 76–91.

  • Li, S., Zheng, J., Lajoie, S. P., & Wiseman, J. (2021b). Examining the relationship between emotion variability, self-regulated learning, and task performance in an intelligent tutoring system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Lester, J. C. (2020). Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinent, G., Gareau, A., Lienhart, N., Nicaise, V., & Guillet-Descas, E. (2018). Emotion profiles and their motivational antecedents among adolescent athletes in intensive training settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 35, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, M. M., Monteiro, S., Pottruff, M. M., Neville, A., Norman, G. R., Eva, K. W., & Kulasegaram, K. (2016). The impact of emotion on learners’ application of basic science principles to novel problems. Academic Medicine, 91(11), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menart-Houtermans, B., Rütter, R., Nowotny, B., Rosenbauer, J., Koliaki, C., Kahl, S., Simon, M.-C., Szendroedi, J., Schloot, N. C., & Roden, M. (2014). Leukocyte profiles differ between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and are associated with metabolic phenotypes: Results from the German Diabetes study (GDS). Diabetes Care, 37(8), 2326–2333. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2015a). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students’ attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015b). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munzar, B., Muis, K. R., Denton, C. A., & Losenno, K. (2020). Elementary students’ cognitive and affective responses to impasses during mathematics problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus: Statistical analysis with latent variables—User’s guide.

  • Naismith, L. M., & Lajoie, S. P. (2018). Motivation and emotion predict medical students’ attention to computer-based feedback. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9806-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerantzaki, K., & Efklides, A. (2019). Epistemic emotions: Interrelationships and changes during task processing. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niculescu, A. C., Tempelaar, D. T., Dailey-Hebert, A., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2016). Extending the change–change model of achievement emotions: The inclusion of negative learning emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnerbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148211.ch7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2 (pp. 3–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-001

  • Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: The Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1268–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Jun, M. C. (2015). Achievement emotions in higher education: A diary study exploring emotions across an assessment event. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American scientist, 89(4), 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time. Learning and Instruction, 54, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. A., Ranellucci, J., Lee, Y., Wormington, S. V., Roseth, C. J., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2017). Affective profiles and academic success in a college science course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raccanello, D., Brondino, M., Crane, M., & Pasini, M. (2016). Antecedents of achievement emotions: Mixed-device assessment with Italian and Australian university students. In M. Caporuscio, F. De la Prieta, T. Di Mascio, R. Gennari, J. Gutierrez Rodriguez, & P. Vittorini (Eds.), Methodologies and intelligent systems for technology enhanced learning (pp. 183–191). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351.

  • Schmitz, B., Klug, J., & Schmidt, M. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 251–266). Routledge New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., Jang, E. E., Azevedo, R., Lau, C., Taub, M., & Mudrick, N. V. (2018). Changes in emotion and their relationship with learning gains in the context of MetaTutor. In R. Nkambou, R. Azevedo, & J. Vassileva (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 202–211). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_20

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Lester, J., & Azevedo, R. (2020). The impact of contextualized emotions on self-regulated learning and scientific reasoning during learning with a game-based learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00191-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, T., Mechelen, I. V., & Kuppens, P. (2010). The relationship between individual differ- ences in intraindividual variability in core affect and interpersonal behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 24(8), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R., & Gellman, M. (2013). Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9

  • Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., & Schubert, S. (2019). Surprise, curiosity, and confusion promote knowledge exploration: Evidence for robust effects of epistemic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Loderer, K. (2020). Surprised–curious–confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration. Emotion, 20(4), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J., Huang, L., Li, S., Lajoie, S. P., Chen, Y., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2021). Self-regulation and emotion matter: A case study of instructor interactions with a learning analytics dashboard. Computers & Education, 161, 104061.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture (FRQSC) awarded to the first author, as well as in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) awarded to the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Juan Zheng: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original Draft.

Susanne P. Lajoie: Writing- Reviewing and Editing, Software, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Shan Li: Investigation, Resources, Formal analysis, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.

Hongbin Wu: Investigation, Resources, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Zheng.

Ethics declarations

The research was conducted in accordance with the journal’s ethical guidelines. The authors declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under considerations for publication elsewhere.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, J., Lajoie, S.P., Li, S. et al. Temporal change of emotions: Identifying academic emotion trajectories and profiles in problem-solving. Metacognition Learning 18, 315–345 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09330-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09330-x

Keywords

Navigation