Skip to main content
Log in

Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences

  • Empirical Study
  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed at identifying the effects of mood treatment, personality factors, and metacognitive knowledge of effort–i.e., conceptualization of effort and perceptions of effort regulation–on metacognitive experiences of students, particularly on their reported feeling of difficulty and estimate of effort. The sample comprised 474 students of 5th and 7th grade of both genders. The participants were tested in two phases. In the first phase, they were asked to respond to questionnaires measuring (a) metacognitive knowledge of effort, (b) maths self-concept, (c) goal orientations, and (d) a test of maths ability. In the second phase, participants were subjected to mood treatment–neutral, positive, and negative– and were asked to solve a mathematical problem. They also rated their prospective metacognitive experiences before solving the problem and the retrospective ones after solving it. Mood treatment interacted with gender in the case of performance but it had no effect on metacognitive experiences. A series of regression analyses showed that positive mood, personality factors, and feeling of difficulty predicted the prospective estimate of effort. Only feeling of difficulty and performance predicted the retrospective estimate of effort. No effect of metacognitive knowledge of effort on estimate of effort was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermitzaki, I., & Efklides, A. (2000). Aspects of self-concept and their relationship with language performance and verbal reasoning ability. American Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 621–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research (pp. 297–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2002). Feelings as subjective evaluations of cognitive processing: How reliable are they? Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 9, 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., & Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students' metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., & Tsiora, A. (2002). Metacognitive experiences, self-concept, and self-regulation. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 45, 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1997). The effects of cognitive ability and affect on school mathematics performance and feelings of difficulty. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 225–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Individual differences in feeling of difficulty: The case of school mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., Samara, A., & Petropoulou, M. (1999). Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E. (1998). Effort as assessed by motivational arousal in identity-relevant tasks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E. (1999). Self-relevance of performance, task difficulty, and task engagement assessed as cardiovascular response. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E., & Brinkmann, K. (2005). The role of mood states in self-regulation: Effects on action preferences and resource mobilization. European Psychologist, 10, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E., & Kruesken, J. (2001). The joint impact of mood state and task difficulty on cardiovascular and electrodermal reactivity in active coping. Psychophysiology, 38, 48–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive mood and decision making. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotion (pp. 63–85). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. (II PDM Report No 171). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa, Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making.

  • Kourkoulou, A. (2004). The factors affecting effort expenditure and self-regulation of effort. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

  • McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Lynley, H. A., Anderman, E., & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., Krunglanski, A. W., & Jost, J. T. (1998). Knowing thyself and others: Progress in metacognitive social psychology. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions (pp. 69–89). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “labor-in-vain effect”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perceptions of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experiences, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry Potter and the philosopher's stone. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenpflug, W. (1992). Anxiety and effort. In D. C. Forgas, T. Sosnowski, & K. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Anxiety: Recent Developments in Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Health Research (pp. 51–62). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum, G., Lidor, R., Lavyan, N., Morrow, K., Tonnel, S., & Gershgoren, A. (2005). Dispositional and task-specific social-cognitive determinants of physical effort perseverance. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 509–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S. E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students' goals. Learning and Instruction, 7, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A., & Gregorich, S. (1989). Difficulty and instrumentality of imminent behavior as determinants of cardiovascular response and self-reported energy. Psychophysiology, 26, 586–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A., Killebrew, K., & Pimpalapure, D. (2002). Cardiovascular incentive effects where a challenge is unfixed: Demonstrations involving social evaluation, evaluator status, and momentary reward. Psychophysiology, 39, 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Efklides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Efklides, A., Kourkoulou, A., Mitsiou, F. et al. Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences. Metacognition Learning 1, 33–49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6581-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6581-0

Keywords

Navigation